Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ... Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
hearing conscientiously but my conclusions about the investigation of the charge are based on what I consider to be acceptable standards of justice, not on practice in the Prison Service at the time. The de novo principle and bias 21.8 It is arguable that Governor McColm did not come to adjudication without prior knowledge. Governor Munns had passed on to him the information that Sonny Lodge was likely to make a counter-allegation that Officer Bowcock had attempted to assault him as payback for some old grievance. I do not think that this knowledge disqualified Governor McColm from considering the charge against Sonny Lodge with an open mind. Sonny’s allegation against Officer Bowcock 21.9 Adjudicators were advised to consider whether an allegation against a member of staff could be fully investigated within the adjudication hearing. Governor McColm concluded that Sonny Lodge’s allegation that the Officer lunged at him could be. 21.10 Having made that decision, he was required to ensure that the allegation was fully explored. Sonny Lodge had not had the benefit of any advice about what constitutes attempted assault. He was at a disadvantage as the defendant facing a charge, compared with his position if he had been interviewed as a complainant. 21.11 Governor McColm assumed that it was a case of Sonny Lodge’s word against that of the officers but, from the record, it appears that the officers’ evidence was less than detailed. According to the governor’s notes, it was largely confirmation of leading questions by the adjudicator. 21.12 From his own evidence, it was questionable whether Officer Downs was in a position to see what happened as he was occupied with the lock. The governor did not probe the context of the search to see whether there might be any anomaly about it that might cast doubt on the officers’ good faith. Officer Downs and Officer Bowcock gave different reasons for it, one referring to entries in Sonny Lodge’s record and the other saying there were entries in the observation book. The governor did not ask for use of force statements. It is said that they were formulaic and uninformative at the time but have now been improved. He did not contemplate the possibility of there being other witnesses to what happened in the cell. Beyond reasonable doubt 159
21.13 In order to find the charge against Sonny Lodge proved, the adjudicator had to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt. For the same reasons that the inquiry considers that Governor McColm made insufficient investigation to dispose of the allegation against the officer, the inquiry concludes that he did not probe the evidence sufficiently to justify a finding that the charge against Sonny Lodge was proved. Fitness for adjudication and cellular confinement 21.14 The prison medical officer saw Sonny Lodge before the adjudication and, on the basis of a conversation, but without reference to his medical history, found him fit for adjudication and cellular confinement. When he decided to impose cellular confinement, Governor McColm had no knowledge of Sonny Lodge’s previous self-harm or the concerns his girlfriend expressed that week. Dr Wright has commented on the system for assessing prisoners’ fitness and the issue has been considered in Chapter 13. Suffice it to say here, that an assessment for cellular confinement without access to any history seems manifestly inadequate. That has been recognised in the system now in operation. 21.15 Policy at the time of Sonny Lodge’s death required prisoners in segregation to be observed at least once an hour. Mr Johnson left Sonny Lodge sometime between three and four o’clock. Sonny Lodge was seen during roll check at about 4.40 pm. No one came to his cell again until 6.20 pm. Findings and recommendation 21.16 Findings: 160 Governor McColm acted in good faith. He had no knowledge of Sonny Lodge’s history of self-harm or the concerns expressed by his girlfriend that week. Governor McColm’s decision to segregate Sonny Lodge was based on an evaluation of where he would receive the best care, but cellular confinement is punishment and isolation may increase vulnerability. Governor McColm did not explore the circumstances of the incident sufficiently to dispose of Sonny Lodge’s counter-allegation against Officer Bowcock. Governor McColm did not explore the circumstances of the incident sufficiently to find that the charge against Sonny Lodge was proved beyond reasonable doubt. The assessment of Sonny Lodge’s fitness for adjudication and cellular confinement before the hearing complied with Prison Service policy at the time
- Page 119 and 120: 13.20 One of the mental health nurs
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 14: SAFEGUARDS AGAINST SUIC
- Page 123 and 124: Meeting the prisoner’s needs. Thi
- Page 125 and 126: 114 Prison culture The policy stat
- Page 127 and 128: 14.16 “Prisoners who are at risk
- Page 129 and 130: Closing a Plan 14.25 The form says
- Page 131 and 132: 14.36 In oral evidence to the inqui
- Page 133 and 134: CHAPTER 15: PREVENTING SUICIDE AND
- Page 135 and 136: mind in the last week of his life i
- Page 137 and 138: colleague to see Sonny Lodge on Thu
- Page 139 and 140: 15.21 ACCT also requires a risk ass
- Page 141 and 142: Chapter 16: THE INQUIRY’S CONSIDE
- Page 143 and 144: Despite these findings, there is in
- Page 145 and 146: 16.17 The inquiry was told that pri
- Page 147 and 148: Chapter 17: TRANSFERS, WING AND CEL
- Page 149 and 150: punishment, there is no evidence th
- Page 151 and 152: held safely; Respect - prisoners ar
- Page 153 and 154: Chapter 18: WAS SONNY LODGE VICTIMI
- Page 155 and 156: surgeon at Whiston Hospital found S
- Page 157 and 158: fact that, as he sees it, injustice
- Page 159 and 160: that it was made at all. However, i
- Page 161 and 162: forcefully, but for prison staff, i
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 20: THE SEARCH AND THE INCI
- Page 165 and 166: However, like the various reports o
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 21: THE ADJUDICATION AND PU
- Page 169: 21.4 PSO 2000, which came into effe
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 22: COMMUNICATIONS AND RECO
- Page 175 and 176: opportunity when the senior officer
- Page 177 and 178: prompted special protection. Conseq
- Page 179 and 180: Manchester prison now 23.4 In evide
- Page 181 and 182: Safety 23.13 I have described in pa
- Page 183 and 184: ehaviour, achievements, interaction
- Page 185 and 186: prison. Many prisoners carry a host
- Page 187 and 188: PART FOUR FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 189 and 190: Information was not always recorded
- Page 191 and 192: opportunities for social interactio
- Page 193 and 194: 41 Governor McColm did not explore
- Page 195 and 196: LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS I have exer
- Page 197 and 198: LIST OF OBSERVATIONS ABOUT INQUIRY
- Page 199 and 200: ANNEX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 1. To
- Page 201 and 202: 9. Communications and record-keepin
- Page 203 and 204: helpful. The chronology will not fo
- Page 205 and 206: Notice of matters requiring explana
- Page 207 and 208: ANNEX 3 LIST OF LEGAL REPRESENTATIV
- Page 209 and 210: PSI Prison Service Instruction PSI
hearing conscientiously but my conclusions about <strong>the</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charge are<br />
based on what I consider to be acceptable standards <strong>of</strong> justice, not on practice in <strong>the</strong><br />
Prison Service at <strong>the</strong> time.<br />
The de novo principle and bias<br />
21.8 It is arguable that Governor McColm did not come to adjudication without prior<br />
knowledge. Governor Munns had passed on to him <strong>the</strong> information that Sonny Lodge<br />
was likely to make a counter-allegation that Officer Bowcock had attempted to assault<br />
him as payback for some old grievance. I do not think that this knowledge disqualified<br />
Governor McColm from considering <strong>the</strong> charge against Sonny Lodge with an open mind.<br />
Sonny’s allegation against Officer Bowcock<br />
21.9 Adjudicators were advised to consider whe<strong>the</strong>r an allegation against a member <strong>of</strong><br />
staff could be fully investigated within <strong>the</strong> adjudication hearing. Governor McColm<br />
concluded that Sonny Lodge’s allegation that <strong>the</strong> Officer lunged at him could be.<br />
21.10 Having made that decision, he was required to ensure that <strong>the</strong> allegation was<br />
fully explored. Sonny Lodge had not had <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> any advice about what constitutes<br />
attempted assault. He was at a disadvantage as <strong>the</strong> defendant facing a charge,<br />
compared with his position if he had been interviewed as a complainant.<br />
21.11 Governor McColm assumed that it was a case <strong>of</strong> Sonny Lodge’s word against<br />
that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers but, from <strong>the</strong> record, it appears that <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers’ evidence was less<br />
than detailed. According to <strong>the</strong> governor’s notes, it was largely confirmation <strong>of</strong> leading<br />
questions by <strong>the</strong> adjudicator.<br />
21.12 From his own evidence, it was questionable whe<strong>the</strong>r Officer Downs was in a<br />
position to see what happened as he was occupied with <strong>the</strong> lock. The governor did not<br />
probe <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> search to see whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re might be any anomaly about it that<br />
might cast doubt on <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers’ good faith. Officer Downs and Officer Bowcock gave<br />
different reasons for it, one referring to entries in Sonny Lodge’s record and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
saying <strong>the</strong>re were entries in <strong>the</strong> observation book. The governor did not ask for use <strong>of</strong><br />
force statements. It is said that <strong>the</strong>y were formulaic and uninformative at <strong>the</strong> time but<br />
have now been improved. He did not contemplate <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>re being o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
witnesses to what happened in <strong>the</strong> cell.<br />
Beyond reasonable doubt<br />
159