Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ... Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

official.documents.gov.uk
from official.documents.gov.uk More from this publisher
06.06.2013 Views

hearing conscientiously but my conclusions about the investigation of the charge are based on what I consider to be acceptable standards of justice, not on practice in the Prison Service at the time. The de novo principle and bias 21.8 It is arguable that Governor McColm did not come to adjudication without prior knowledge. Governor Munns had passed on to him the information that Sonny Lodge was likely to make a counter-allegation that Officer Bowcock had attempted to assault him as payback for some old grievance. I do not think that this knowledge disqualified Governor McColm from considering the charge against Sonny Lodge with an open mind. Sonny’s allegation against Officer Bowcock 21.9 Adjudicators were advised to consider whether an allegation against a member of staff could be fully investigated within the adjudication hearing. Governor McColm concluded that Sonny Lodge’s allegation that the Officer lunged at him could be. 21.10 Having made that decision, he was required to ensure that the allegation was fully explored. Sonny Lodge had not had the benefit of any advice about what constitutes attempted assault. He was at a disadvantage as the defendant facing a charge, compared with his position if he had been interviewed as a complainant. 21.11 Governor McColm assumed that it was a case of Sonny Lodge’s word against that of the officers but, from the record, it appears that the officers’ evidence was less than detailed. According to the governor’s notes, it was largely confirmation of leading questions by the adjudicator. 21.12 From his own evidence, it was questionable whether Officer Downs was in a position to see what happened as he was occupied with the lock. The governor did not probe the context of the search to see whether there might be any anomaly about it that might cast doubt on the officers’ good faith. Officer Downs and Officer Bowcock gave different reasons for it, one referring to entries in Sonny Lodge’s record and the other saying there were entries in the observation book. The governor did not ask for use of force statements. It is said that they were formulaic and uninformative at the time but have now been improved. He did not contemplate the possibility of there being other witnesses to what happened in the cell. Beyond reasonable doubt 159

21.13 In order to find the charge against Sonny Lodge proved, the adjudicator had to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt. For the same reasons that the inquiry considers that Governor McColm made insufficient investigation to dispose of the allegation against the officer, the inquiry concludes that he did not probe the evidence sufficiently to justify a finding that the charge against Sonny Lodge was proved. Fitness for adjudication and cellular confinement 21.14 The prison medical officer saw Sonny Lodge before the adjudication and, on the basis of a conversation, but without reference to his medical history, found him fit for adjudication and cellular confinement. When he decided to impose cellular confinement, Governor McColm had no knowledge of Sonny Lodge’s previous self-harm or the concerns his girlfriend expressed that week. Dr Wright has commented on the system for assessing prisoners’ fitness and the issue has been considered in Chapter 13. Suffice it to say here, that an assessment for cellular confinement without access to any history seems manifestly inadequate. That has been recognised in the system now in operation. 21.15 Policy at the time of Sonny Lodge’s death required prisoners in segregation to be observed at least once an hour. Mr Johnson left Sonny Lodge sometime between three and four o’clock. Sonny Lodge was seen during roll check at about 4.40 pm. No one came to his cell again until 6.20 pm. Findings and recommendation 21.16 Findings: 160 Governor McColm acted in good faith. He had no knowledge of Sonny Lodge’s history of self-harm or the concerns expressed by his girlfriend that week. Governor McColm’s decision to segregate Sonny Lodge was based on an evaluation of where he would receive the best care, but cellular confinement is punishment and isolation may increase vulnerability. Governor McColm did not explore the circumstances of the incident sufficiently to dispose of Sonny Lodge’s counter-allegation against Officer Bowcock. Governor McColm did not explore the circumstances of the incident sufficiently to find that the charge against Sonny Lodge was proved beyond reasonable doubt. The assessment of Sonny Lodge’s fitness for adjudication and cellular confinement before the hearing complied with Prison Service policy at the time

hearing conscientiously but my conclusions about <strong>the</strong> investigation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charge are<br />

based on what I consider to be acceptable standards <strong>of</strong> justice, not on practice in <strong>the</strong><br />

Prison Service at <strong>the</strong> time.<br />

The de novo principle and bias<br />

21.8 It is arguable that Governor McColm did not come to adjudication without prior<br />

knowledge. Governor Munns had passed on to him <strong>the</strong> information that Sonny Lodge<br />

was likely to make a counter-allegation that Officer Bowcock had attempted to assault<br />

him as payback for some old grievance. I do not think that this knowledge disqualified<br />

Governor McColm from considering <strong>the</strong> charge against Sonny Lodge with an open mind.<br />

Sonny’s allegation against Officer Bowcock<br />

21.9 Adjudicators were advised to consider whe<strong>the</strong>r an allegation against a member <strong>of</strong><br />

staff could be fully investigated within <strong>the</strong> adjudication hearing. Governor McColm<br />

concluded that Sonny Lodge’s allegation that <strong>the</strong> Officer lunged at him could be.<br />

21.10 Having made that decision, he was required to ensure that <strong>the</strong> allegation was<br />

fully explored. Sonny Lodge had not had <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> any advice about what constitutes<br />

attempted assault. He was at a disadvantage as <strong>the</strong> defendant facing a charge,<br />

compared with his position if he had been interviewed as a complainant.<br />

21.11 Governor McColm assumed that it was a case <strong>of</strong> Sonny Lodge’s word against<br />

that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers but, from <strong>the</strong> record, it appears that <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers’ evidence was less<br />

than detailed. According to <strong>the</strong> governor’s notes, it was largely confirmation <strong>of</strong> leading<br />

questions by <strong>the</strong> adjudicator.<br />

21.12 From his own evidence, it was questionable whe<strong>the</strong>r Officer Downs was in a<br />

position to see what happened as he was occupied with <strong>the</strong> lock. The governor did not<br />

probe <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> search to see whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re might be any anomaly about it that<br />

might cast doubt on <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers’ good faith. Officer Downs and Officer Bowcock gave<br />

different reasons for it, one referring to entries in Sonny Lodge’s record and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

saying <strong>the</strong>re were entries in <strong>the</strong> observation book. The governor did not ask for use <strong>of</strong><br />

force statements. It is said that <strong>the</strong>y were formulaic and uninformative at <strong>the</strong> time but<br />

have now been improved. He did not contemplate <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>re being o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

witnesses to what happened in <strong>the</strong> cell.<br />

Beyond reasonable doubt<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!