Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ... Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

official.documents.gov.uk
from official.documents.gov.uk More from this publisher
06.06.2013 Views

There is insufficient evidence to conclude whether the gestures of Officer Bowcock or Sonny Lodge were the more threatening. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether the use of force on Sonny Lodge was justified and lawful. An adjudication about a related charge against a prisoner is not a sufficient investigation of the use of force. Prison managers should have ensured that use of force records were completed and, as a matter of routine, that an incident involving use of force was investigated. 155

Chapter 21: THE ADJUDICATION AND PUNISHMENT Introduction 21.1 The inquiry undertook to examine whether the conduct and conclusion of the adjudication was in accordance with Prison Service guidance. This chapter considers the conduct of the adjudication and the supervision of Sonny Lodge in the segregation unit. It also refers to the assessment of fitness for adjudication and cellular confinement but that has been considered more extensively in Chapter 13. Administrative background The Prison Discipline Manual 21.2 The Prison Discipline Manual contains instructions and guidance on the discipline system. The 1995 edition of the manual (PDM 1995) was in use in 1998. Among other things, the manual said that: 156 The adjudicator must come to the adjudication afresh with an uncluttered mind (this is called the de novo principle) and without bias which might arise from prior knowledge or personal interest. The manual says that a general good knowledge of the prisoner’s history would not be sufficient to amount to bias. The adjudicator must determine the case solely on the evidence presented at the hearing and the proceedings should be started without access to the prison record of the prisoner accused or record of any previous disciplinary offences in prison (PDM 1995, paragraphs 3.12-3.13, 9.10-9.11, 10.1, 10.2 and Appendix 4 paragraph 5 and 20). If an allegation is made by the accused against staff that is relevant to the charge, the adjudicator should consider what steps need to be taken to allow a full investigation. The manual says that it will often be the case that the adjudicator can thoroughly investigate the allegation at the adjudication by calling witnesses and questioning the prisoner making the allegation. In these cases, the adjudication may be concluded without a separate investigation (PDM 1995, paragraphs 5.18-5.19). On the day of an adjudication hearing and before the hearing starts the accused will be examined by a medical officer who will note on form F256 (the record of

Chapter 21:<br />

THE ADJUDICATION AND PUNISHMENT<br />

Introduction<br />

21.1 The inquiry undertook to examine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> conduct and conclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

adjudication was in accordance with Prison Service guidance. This chapter considers <strong>the</strong><br />

conduct <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adjudication and <strong>the</strong> supervision <strong>of</strong> Sonny Lodge in <strong>the</strong> segregation unit.<br />

It also refers to <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> fitness for adjudication and cellular confinement but<br />

that has been considered more extensively in Chapter 13.<br />

Administrative background<br />

The Prison Discipline Manual<br />

21.2 The Prison Discipline Manual contains instructions and guidance on <strong>the</strong> discipline<br />

system. The 1995 edition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> manual (PDM 1995) was in use in 1998. Among o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

things, <strong>the</strong> manual said that:<br />

156<br />

The adjudicator must come to <strong>the</strong> adjudication afresh with an uncluttered mind<br />

(this is called <strong>the</strong> de novo principle) and without bias which might arise from prior<br />

knowledge or personal interest. The manual says that a general good knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prisoner’s history would not be sufficient to amount to bias. The adjudicator<br />

must determine <strong>the</strong> case solely on <strong>the</strong> evidence presented at <strong>the</strong> hearing and <strong>the</strong><br />

proceedings should be started without access to <strong>the</strong> prison record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prisoner<br />

accused or record <strong>of</strong> any previous disciplinary <strong>of</strong>fences in prison (PDM 1995,<br />

paragraphs 3.12-3.13, 9.10-9.11, 10.1, 10.2 and Appendix 4 paragraph 5 and<br />

20).<br />

If an allegation is made by <strong>the</strong> accused against staff that is relevant to <strong>the</strong><br />

charge, <strong>the</strong> adjudicator should consider what steps need to be taken to allow a<br />

full investigation. The manual says that it will <strong>of</strong>ten be <strong>the</strong> case that <strong>the</strong><br />

adjudicator can thoroughly investigate <strong>the</strong> allegation at <strong>the</strong> adjudication by calling<br />

witnesses and questioning <strong>the</strong> prisoner making <strong>the</strong> allegation. In <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>the</strong><br />

adjudication may be concluded without a separate investigation (PDM 1995,<br />

paragraphs 5.18-5.19).<br />

On <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> an adjudication hearing and before <strong>the</strong> hearing starts <strong>the</strong> accused<br />

will be examined by a medical <strong>of</strong>ficer who will note on form F256 (<strong>the</strong> record <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!