Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ... Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...

official.documents.gov.uk
from official.documents.gov.uk More from this publisher
06.06.2013 Views

16.4 The evidence of Officer Clucas, Mr Routledge and Mr Brownley is consistent in saying that Officer Brownley came out of the cubicle, propelled by force, only seconds after Sonny Lodge entered it. That allowed little time for de-escalation or the suggestion of going outside to smoke. Moreover it is not clear why Officer Brownley found it necessary to move forward into the cubicle to give his instruction. 16.5 The inquiry has also received circumstantial evidence. The bruise on Sonny Lodge’s neck might have occurred in the struggle that followed the incident or on another occasion but it is consistent with Sonny’s account in a letter, as reported by Governor Halliwell, and later by the chaplains. There is no record of any visible injury consistent with Sonny’s claim in the letter that the officer hit him in the mouth but that does not show the claim is false. 16.6 Mr Brownley’s previous disciplinary offence, resorting to direct action to enforce the rules, concerns about his performance thereafter, and the rumours circulating in the prison that very week raise uncomfortable questions about his conduct. In her evidence, Governor Williams was clear that she had spoken to Mr Brownley about the rumour that he would engineer an assault to go on sick leave. It is a long time since the incident occurred, but it was surprising that Mr Brownley had no recollection of being informed about the rumour or of his application to transfer to Manchester prison. 16.7 The inquiry has no authority to try Sonny Lodge or Officer Brownley on the charge of assault. The inquiry draws conclusions on the balance of probabilities not the criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. The inquiry has insufficient evidence to speculate about the verdict that a court might have reached on the charge against Sonny Lodge. On behalf of Mr Brownley, Counsel has argued persuasively that the more serious the criticism, the greater the weight of evidence required to support it. I agree. Findings about the incident 16.8 I find that: At the time of the incident at Whiston Hospital, there was in existence a rumour that Officer Brownley would engineer an assault by a prisoner and Governor Williams spoke to Officer Brownley about it. At the time of the incident at Whiston Hospital, Officer Brownley had a pending appeal against refusal of an application for a transfer to Manchester prison. 131

Despite these findings, there is insufficient evidence to conclude, on the balance of probabilities, that the incident in the toilet cubicle was premeditated or contrived. Sonny Lodge’s behaviour in the waiting area at Whiston hospital was truculent and challenging. Officer Brownley’s determination to enforce instant compliance with the hospital ‘no smoking’ policy was overzealous and he sought to enforce his instruction without the skill and sensitivity that could reasonably be expected of a professional officer. The inquiry finds on the balance of probabilities that Mr Lodge pushed Officer Brownley away in reaction to the officer’s unjustified and inappropriate movement towards him. The inquiry is unable to conclude from the evidence available whether or not Officer Brownley laid hands on Mr Lodge before he was pushed. Consideration: the Prison Service’s response to the incident 16.9 Given the information known to Risley prison about the serious incident at Whiston Hospital, it is extraordinary that no action was taken to investigate what happened or even to ensure that the required records were completed. 16.10 There was a failure to complete appropriate paperwork. Policy at the time required Use of Force statements to be completed whenever officers used control and restraint. An F213 Injury to Inmate form should have been completed with reference to the bruise on Sonny Lodge’s neck that is recorded in his medical record. Completion of an F213 would have required a brief report of the circumstances in which the injury was sustained so might have prompted further inquiry about the circumstances of the injury. 16.11 There was no Prison Service investigation of the incident on the grounds that the case was in the hands of the police. It is not clear how the police came to pursue it. Although he was the complainant, Officer Brownley told the inquiry that it was not his initiative. Risley prison apparently already believed on 28 June that the police were to formulate charges. 16.12 The case seems not to have been a high priority for the police. The incident occurred on 27 June. Mr Routledge was interviewed on 8 July and Officer Brownley on 4 132

16.4 The evidence <strong>of</strong> Officer Clucas, Mr Routledge and Mr Brownley is consistent in<br />

saying that Officer Brownley came out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cubicle, propelled by force, only seconds<br />

after Sonny Lodge entered it. That allowed little time for de-escalation or <strong>the</strong> suggestion<br />

<strong>of</strong> going outside to smoke. Moreover it is not clear why Officer Brownley found it<br />

necessary to move forward <strong>into</strong> <strong>the</strong> cubicle to give his instruction.<br />

16.5 The inquiry has also received circumstantial evidence. The bruise on Sonny<br />

Lodge’s neck might have occurred in <strong>the</strong> struggle that followed <strong>the</strong> incident or on<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r occasion but it is consistent with Sonny’s account in a letter, as reported by<br />

Governor Halliwell, and later by <strong>the</strong> chaplains. There is no record <strong>of</strong> any visible injury<br />

consistent with Sonny’s claim in <strong>the</strong> letter that <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficer hit him in <strong>the</strong> mouth but that<br />

does not show <strong>the</strong> claim is false.<br />

16.6 Mr Brownley’s previous disciplinary <strong>of</strong>fence, resorting to direct action to enforce<br />

<strong>the</strong> rules, concerns about his performance <strong>the</strong>reafter, and <strong>the</strong> rumours circulating in <strong>the</strong><br />

prison that very week raise uncomfortable questions about his conduct. In her evidence,<br />

Governor Williams was clear that she had spoken to Mr Brownley about <strong>the</strong> rumour that<br />

he would engineer an assault to go on sick leave. It is a long time since <strong>the</strong> incident<br />

occurred, but it was surprising that Mr Brownley had no recollection <strong>of</strong> being informed<br />

about <strong>the</strong> rumour or <strong>of</strong> his application to transfer to Manchester prison.<br />

16.7 The inquiry has no authority to try Sonny Lodge or Officer Brownley on <strong>the</strong><br />

charge <strong>of</strong> assault. The inquiry draws conclusions on <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> probabilities not <strong>the</strong><br />

criminal standard <strong>of</strong> beyond a reasonable doubt. The inquiry has insufficient evidence to<br />

speculate about <strong>the</strong> verdict that a court might have reached on <strong>the</strong> charge against<br />

Sonny Lodge. On behalf <strong>of</strong> Mr Brownley, Counsel has argued persuasively that <strong>the</strong> more<br />

serious <strong>the</strong> criticism, <strong>the</strong> greater <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> evidence required to support it. I agree.<br />

Findings about <strong>the</strong> incident<br />

16.8 I find that:<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incident at Whiston Hospital, <strong>the</strong>re was in existence a rumour<br />

that Officer Brownley would engineer an assault by a prisoner and Governor<br />

Williams spoke to Officer Brownley about it.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incident at Whiston Hospital, Officer Brownley had a pending<br />

appeal against refusal <strong>of</strong> an application for a transfer to Manchester prison.<br />

131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!