Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ... Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
16.4 The evidence of Officer Clucas, Mr Routledge and Mr Brownley is consistent in saying that Officer Brownley came out of the cubicle, propelled by force, only seconds after Sonny Lodge entered it. That allowed little time for de-escalation or the suggestion of going outside to smoke. Moreover it is not clear why Officer Brownley found it necessary to move forward into the cubicle to give his instruction. 16.5 The inquiry has also received circumstantial evidence. The bruise on Sonny Lodge’s neck might have occurred in the struggle that followed the incident or on another occasion but it is consistent with Sonny’s account in a letter, as reported by Governor Halliwell, and later by the chaplains. There is no record of any visible injury consistent with Sonny’s claim in the letter that the officer hit him in the mouth but that does not show the claim is false. 16.6 Mr Brownley’s previous disciplinary offence, resorting to direct action to enforce the rules, concerns about his performance thereafter, and the rumours circulating in the prison that very week raise uncomfortable questions about his conduct. In her evidence, Governor Williams was clear that she had spoken to Mr Brownley about the rumour that he would engineer an assault to go on sick leave. It is a long time since the incident occurred, but it was surprising that Mr Brownley had no recollection of being informed about the rumour or of his application to transfer to Manchester prison. 16.7 The inquiry has no authority to try Sonny Lodge or Officer Brownley on the charge of assault. The inquiry draws conclusions on the balance of probabilities not the criminal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. The inquiry has insufficient evidence to speculate about the verdict that a court might have reached on the charge against Sonny Lodge. On behalf of Mr Brownley, Counsel has argued persuasively that the more serious the criticism, the greater the weight of evidence required to support it. I agree. Findings about the incident 16.8 I find that: At the time of the incident at Whiston Hospital, there was in existence a rumour that Officer Brownley would engineer an assault by a prisoner and Governor Williams spoke to Officer Brownley about it. At the time of the incident at Whiston Hospital, Officer Brownley had a pending appeal against refusal of an application for a transfer to Manchester prison. 131
Despite these findings, there is insufficient evidence to conclude, on the balance of probabilities, that the incident in the toilet cubicle was premeditated or contrived. Sonny Lodge’s behaviour in the waiting area at Whiston hospital was truculent and challenging. Officer Brownley’s determination to enforce instant compliance with the hospital ‘no smoking’ policy was overzealous and he sought to enforce his instruction without the skill and sensitivity that could reasonably be expected of a professional officer. The inquiry finds on the balance of probabilities that Mr Lodge pushed Officer Brownley away in reaction to the officer’s unjustified and inappropriate movement towards him. The inquiry is unable to conclude from the evidence available whether or not Officer Brownley laid hands on Mr Lodge before he was pushed. Consideration: the Prison Service’s response to the incident 16.9 Given the information known to Risley prison about the serious incident at Whiston Hospital, it is extraordinary that no action was taken to investigate what happened or even to ensure that the required records were completed. 16.10 There was a failure to complete appropriate paperwork. Policy at the time required Use of Force statements to be completed whenever officers used control and restraint. An F213 Injury to Inmate form should have been completed with reference to the bruise on Sonny Lodge’s neck that is recorded in his medical record. Completion of an F213 would have required a brief report of the circumstances in which the injury was sustained so might have prompted further inquiry about the circumstances of the injury. 16.11 There was no Prison Service investigation of the incident on the grounds that the case was in the hands of the police. It is not clear how the police came to pursue it. Although he was the complainant, Officer Brownley told the inquiry that it was not his initiative. Risley prison apparently already believed on 28 June that the police were to formulate charges. 16.12 The case seems not to have been a high priority for the police. The incident occurred on 27 June. Mr Routledge was interviewed on 8 July and Officer Brownley on 4 132
- Page 91 and 92: punishment for the altercation in t
- Page 93 and 94: 82 The diagnosis of dissocial pers
- Page 95 and 96: 11.6 Back in the chaplains’ offic
- Page 97 and 98: take his clothes off for a search a
- Page 99 and 100: Subsequent statements to the Prison
- Page 101 and 102: Evidence to the inquiry SO Knight 1
- Page 103 and 104: going to happen to him. She was als
- Page 105 and 106: 11.53 In his final letter to his gi
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 12: ISSUES RAISED IN THE CL
- Page 109 and 110: should not routinely be used. But i
- Page 111 and 112: impulsivity; difficulty forming rel
- Page 113 and 114: any underlying paranoid illness as
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 13: ISSUES RAISED IN THE CL
- Page 117 and 118: Changes to assessing fitness 13.10
- Page 119 and 120: 13.20 One of the mental health nurs
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 14: SAFEGUARDS AGAINST SUIC
- Page 123 and 124: Meeting the prisoner’s needs. Thi
- Page 125 and 126: 114 Prison culture The policy stat
- Page 127 and 128: 14.16 “Prisoners who are at risk
- Page 129 and 130: Closing a Plan 14.25 The form says
- Page 131 and 132: 14.36 In oral evidence to the inqui
- Page 133 and 134: CHAPTER 15: PREVENTING SUICIDE AND
- Page 135 and 136: mind in the last week of his life i
- Page 137 and 138: colleague to see Sonny Lodge on Thu
- Page 139 and 140: 15.21 ACCT also requires a risk ass
- Page 141: Chapter 16: THE INQUIRY’S CONSIDE
- Page 145 and 146: 16.17 The inquiry was told that pri
- Page 147 and 148: Chapter 17: TRANSFERS, WING AND CEL
- Page 149 and 150: punishment, there is no evidence th
- Page 151 and 152: held safely; Respect - prisoners ar
- Page 153 and 154: Chapter 18: WAS SONNY LODGE VICTIMI
- Page 155 and 156: surgeon at Whiston Hospital found S
- Page 157 and 158: fact that, as he sees it, injustice
- Page 159 and 160: that it was made at all. However, i
- Page 161 and 162: forcefully, but for prison staff, i
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 20: THE SEARCH AND THE INCI
- Page 165 and 166: However, like the various reports o
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 21: THE ADJUDICATION AND PU
- Page 169 and 170: 21.4 PSO 2000, which came into effe
- Page 171 and 172: 21.13 In order to find the charge a
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 22: COMMUNICATIONS AND RECO
- Page 175 and 176: opportunity when the senior officer
- Page 177 and 178: prompted special protection. Conseq
- Page 179 and 180: Manchester prison now 23.4 In evide
- Page 181 and 182: Safety 23.13 I have described in pa
- Page 183 and 184: ehaviour, achievements, interaction
- Page 185 and 186: prison. Many prisoners carry a host
- Page 187 and 188: PART FOUR FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 189 and 190: Information was not always recorded
- Page 191 and 192: opportunities for social interactio
16.4 The evidence <strong>of</strong> Officer Clucas, Mr Routledge and Mr Brownley is consistent in<br />
saying that Officer Brownley came out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cubicle, propelled by force, only seconds<br />
after Sonny Lodge entered it. That allowed little time for de-escalation or <strong>the</strong> suggestion<br />
<strong>of</strong> going outside to smoke. Moreover it is not clear why Officer Brownley found it<br />
necessary to move forward <strong>into</strong> <strong>the</strong> cubicle to give his instruction.<br />
16.5 The inquiry has also received circumstantial evidence. The bruise on Sonny<br />
Lodge’s neck might have occurred in <strong>the</strong> struggle that followed <strong>the</strong> incident or on<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r occasion but it is consistent with Sonny’s account in a letter, as reported by<br />
Governor Halliwell, and later by <strong>the</strong> chaplains. There is no record <strong>of</strong> any visible injury<br />
consistent with Sonny’s claim in <strong>the</strong> letter that <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficer hit him in <strong>the</strong> mouth but that<br />
does not show <strong>the</strong> claim is false.<br />
16.6 Mr Brownley’s previous disciplinary <strong>of</strong>fence, resorting to direct action to enforce<br />
<strong>the</strong> rules, concerns about his performance <strong>the</strong>reafter, and <strong>the</strong> rumours circulating in <strong>the</strong><br />
prison that very week raise uncomfortable questions about his conduct. In her evidence,<br />
Governor Williams was clear that she had spoken to Mr Brownley about <strong>the</strong> rumour that<br />
he would engineer an assault to go on sick leave. It is a long time since <strong>the</strong> incident<br />
occurred, but it was surprising that Mr Brownley had no recollection <strong>of</strong> being informed<br />
about <strong>the</strong> rumour or <strong>of</strong> his application to transfer to Manchester prison.<br />
16.7 The inquiry has no authority to try Sonny Lodge or Officer Brownley on <strong>the</strong><br />
charge <strong>of</strong> assault. The inquiry draws conclusions on <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> probabilities not <strong>the</strong><br />
criminal standard <strong>of</strong> beyond a reasonable doubt. The inquiry has insufficient evidence to<br />
speculate about <strong>the</strong> verdict that a court might have reached on <strong>the</strong> charge against<br />
Sonny Lodge. On behalf <strong>of</strong> Mr Brownley, Counsel has argued persuasively that <strong>the</strong> more<br />
serious <strong>the</strong> criticism, <strong>the</strong> greater <strong>the</strong> weight <strong>of</strong> evidence required to support it. I agree.<br />
Findings about <strong>the</strong> incident<br />
16.8 I find that:<br />
At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incident at Whiston Hospital, <strong>the</strong>re was in existence a rumour<br />
that Officer Brownley would engineer an assault by a prisoner and Governor<br />
Williams spoke to Officer Brownley about it.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> incident at Whiston Hospital, Officer Brownley had a pending<br />
appeal against refusal <strong>of</strong> an application for a transfer to Manchester prison.<br />
131