Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ... Report of the Inquiry into the circumstances of the Death of Bernard ...
14.41 The inquiry asked whether there were any problems encountered at Manchester that impact on the Listener service. The organisers spoke positively of the relationship with prison staff generally and the Safer Custody team in particular but said there were some logistical problems. It appears to take a long time for security/probation to clear and check potential Listeners for Samaritan selection. This delays training. It is important to train new Listeners to maintain sufficient numbers as experienced Listeners are transferred or released. Sometimes there will be five Listeners on one wing and no Listeners on another which may mean that a Listener cannot be provided when required as it is difficult to transfer a Listener, especially during the night period. Samaritans telephones are handed out when requested but as most cells have double occupancy prisoners cannot speak to the Samaritans branch confidentially. 14.42 The Safer Prisons Coordinator at Manchester Prison, Mr Dugdale, provided information to the inquiry about the rigorous selection and training procedure for Listeners. Coupled with the transient nature of the prisoner population at Manchester, this presents challenges for maintaining a full complement of Listeners. For example, qualification as a Listener cannot stand in the way of a progressive move to another prison to assist rehabilitation and reduce risk to the public. Another factor was the extensive security vetting required for members of the Samaritans prison team. This currently took between six and 12 weeks. That had reduced the numbers of Samaritans available so they had been able to run only one training course for Listeners in each of the last two years, whereas previously they had been able to run two each year. Mr Dugdale said that the prison and the Samaritans team were working together to try to attract more Samaritans to the prisons team. 121
CHAPTER 15: PREVENTING SUICIDE AND SELF HARM (2): CONSIDERATION AND FINDINGS Consideration 15.1 The Prison Service has a duty to take reasonable care to protect the life and wellbeing of prisoners in its custody. There are reasons why many people in prison are especially vulnerable. They include mental ill-health and other medical problems, drug or alcohol dependence, the experience of withdrawal from dependence, the experience of confinement, things that happen in prison, being cut off from family and friends and other kinds of support, problems prior to imprisonment, being unable to attend to personal problems outside the prison. 15.2 During his time in prison Sonny Lodge was at times identified as being at risk of suicide and self-harm and on one occasion he deliberately lacerated his arms. At the time of his death he was not thought to be at risk and there were no special safeguards to help or protect him. This chapter examines: compliance with the F2052SH system in force at the time the limitations of that system problems in identifying risk the response to Ms A’s warnings the importance of sharing information what would have been different if an F2052SH had been opened how practice would have differed under the current ACCT system. Compliance with the F2052SH procedures at the time 15.3 The inquiry examined whether the F2052SH procedure was operated in accordance with Prison Service guidance and appropriately and whether there are lessons to be drawn. 15.4 So long as Sonny Lodge was subject to an F2052SH staff maintained special observation of him and the plans were operated seemingly conscientiously and broadly, though not entirely, in accordance with guidance and the usual practice at the time. It was to the credit of staff at Risley that a plan was opened when Sonny Lodge was admitted and, at Manchester, that they kept the plan open initially despite Sonny’s 122
- Page 81 and 82: 9.34 Mr Bowcock was asked about the
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 10: AFTER THE SEARCH: THE I
- Page 85 and 86: and now they’re doing three years
- Page 87 and 88: Mr Lodge’s account of the inciden
- Page 89 and 90: HCOs advised staff to loosen their
- Page 91 and 92: punishment for the altercation in t
- Page 93 and 94: 82 The diagnosis of dissocial pers
- Page 95 and 96: 11.6 Back in the chaplains’ offic
- Page 97 and 98: take his clothes off for a search a
- Page 99 and 100: Subsequent statements to the Prison
- Page 101 and 102: Evidence to the inquiry SO Knight 1
- Page 103 and 104: going to happen to him. She was als
- Page 105 and 106: 11.53 In his final letter to his gi
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 12: ISSUES RAISED IN THE CL
- Page 109 and 110: should not routinely be used. But i
- Page 111 and 112: impulsivity; difficulty forming rel
- Page 113 and 114: any underlying paranoid illness as
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 13: ISSUES RAISED IN THE CL
- Page 117 and 118: Changes to assessing fitness 13.10
- Page 119 and 120: 13.20 One of the mental health nurs
- Page 121 and 122: Chapter 14: SAFEGUARDS AGAINST SUIC
- Page 123 and 124: Meeting the prisoner’s needs. Thi
- Page 125 and 126: 114 Prison culture The policy stat
- Page 127 and 128: 14.16 “Prisoners who are at risk
- Page 129 and 130: Closing a Plan 14.25 The form says
- Page 131: 14.36 In oral evidence to the inqui
- Page 135 and 136: mind in the last week of his life i
- Page 137 and 138: colleague to see Sonny Lodge on Thu
- Page 139 and 140: 15.21 ACCT also requires a risk ass
- Page 141 and 142: Chapter 16: THE INQUIRY’S CONSIDE
- Page 143 and 144: Despite these findings, there is in
- Page 145 and 146: 16.17 The inquiry was told that pri
- Page 147 and 148: Chapter 17: TRANSFERS, WING AND CEL
- Page 149 and 150: punishment, there is no evidence th
- Page 151 and 152: held safely; Respect - prisoners ar
- Page 153 and 154: Chapter 18: WAS SONNY LODGE VICTIMI
- Page 155 and 156: surgeon at Whiston Hospital found S
- Page 157 and 158: fact that, as he sees it, injustice
- Page 159 and 160: that it was made at all. However, i
- Page 161 and 162: forcefully, but for prison staff, i
- Page 163 and 164: Chapter 20: THE SEARCH AND THE INCI
- Page 165 and 166: However, like the various reports o
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 21: THE ADJUDICATION AND PU
- Page 169 and 170: 21.4 PSO 2000, which came into effe
- Page 171 and 172: 21.13 In order to find the charge a
- Page 173 and 174: Chapter 22: COMMUNICATIONS AND RECO
- Page 175 and 176: opportunity when the senior officer
- Page 177 and 178: prompted special protection. Conseq
- Page 179 and 180: Manchester prison now 23.4 In evide
- Page 181 and 182: Safety 23.13 I have described in pa
CHAPTER 15:<br />
PREVENTING SUICIDE AND SELF HARM (2): CONSIDERATION AND FINDINGS<br />
Consideration<br />
15.1 The Prison Service has a duty to take reasonable care to protect <strong>the</strong> life and wellbeing<br />
<strong>of</strong> prisoners in its custody. There are reasons why many people in prison are<br />
especially vulnerable. They include mental ill-health and o<strong>the</strong>r medical problems, drug or<br />
alcohol dependence, <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> withdrawal from dependence, <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong><br />
confinement, things that happen in prison, being cut <strong>of</strong>f from family and friends and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> support, problems prior to imprisonment, being unable to attend to personal<br />
problems outside <strong>the</strong> prison.<br />
15.2 During his time in prison Sonny Lodge was at times identified as being at risk <strong>of</strong><br />
suicide and self-harm and on one occasion he deliberately lacerated his arms. At <strong>the</strong><br />
time <strong>of</strong> his death he was not thought to be at risk and <strong>the</strong>re were no special safeguards<br />
to help or protect him. This chapter examines:<br />
compliance with <strong>the</strong> F2052SH system in force at <strong>the</strong> time<br />
<strong>the</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> that system<br />
problems in identifying risk<br />
<strong>the</strong> response to Ms A’s warnings<br />
<strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> sharing information<br />
what would have been different if an F2052SH had been opened<br />
how practice would have differed under <strong>the</strong> current ACCT system.<br />
Compliance with <strong>the</strong> F2052SH procedures at <strong>the</strong> time<br />
15.3 The inquiry examined whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> F2052SH procedure was operated in<br />
accordance with Prison Service guidance and appropriately and whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re are<br />
lessons to be drawn.<br />
15.4 So long as Sonny Lodge was subject to an F2052SH staff maintained special<br />
observation <strong>of</strong> him and <strong>the</strong> plans were operated seemingly conscientiously and broadly,<br />
though not entirely, in accordance with guidance and <strong>the</strong> usual practice at <strong>the</strong> time. It<br />
was to <strong>the</strong> credit <strong>of</strong> staff at Risley that a plan was opened when Sonny Lodge was<br />
admitted and, at Manchester, that <strong>the</strong>y kept <strong>the</strong> plan open initially despite Sonny’s<br />
122