06.06.2013 Views

Posterske teme Poster topics - Biochemia Medica

Posterske teme Poster topics - Biochemia Medica

Posterske teme Poster topics - Biochemia Medica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P22-3 Procjena analitičkih sustava<br />

jednost grupe, pričem se prihvatljivima smatraju oni koji<br />

se nalaze unutar dozvoljenog odstupanja od ±2 relativne<br />

standardne devijacije (SDI). U Zavodu za kliničku kemiju<br />

koncentracija mioglobina se određuje imunoturbidimetrijskom<br />

metodom na analizatoru Olympus AU 400,<br />

a rezultati se procjenjuju prema grupi ostalih metoda (4<br />

laboratorija). Koncentracija cTnI se određuje imunokemijskom<br />

(RPIA) metodom na analizatoru Dade Stratus CS, a<br />

rezultat se procjenjuje prema metodi RPIA (Dade Behring<br />

Stratus CS; 9 laboratorija). Procjena rezultata bez obzira<br />

na metodu je pokazala veliku varijabilnost (KV %): za mioglobin<br />

26,6% i za cTnI 77,7%. Grupiranje rezultata prema<br />

metodama je pokazalo manju varijabilnost: za mioglobin<br />

0,5–31,4% i za cTnI 3,6–20,7%. Varijabilnost rezultata<br />

grupe u kojoj se procjenjuju naši rezultati za mioglobin je<br />

bila 25,9%, što je očekivana vrijednost s obzirom na broj<br />

sudionika i heterogenost grupe. Varijabilnost rezultata za<br />

cTnI u grupi metoda RPIA je iznosila 6,1%, što je očekivana<br />

vrijednost s obzirom na homogenost grupe. S obzirom na<br />

visoku varijabilnost rezultata bez obzira na metodu neophodna<br />

je standardizacija metoda za cTnI primjenom metoda<br />

defi niranih vezanjem protutijela isključivo na epitope<br />

stabilnoga dijela molekule cTnI i KV manjim od 10%. Iako<br />

su rezultati za mioglobin usklađeniji, varijabilnost unutar<br />

pojedinih metoda nameće standardizaciju metoda za mioglobin<br />

prema certifi ciranom referentnom materijalu.<br />

E-mail: mariana.kardum@zg.htnet.hr<br />

P22-4<br />

Prijeanalitičke pogrješke u laboratorijskoj<br />

medicini: vrsta i učestalost<br />

Brkljačić V, Rogić D, Juričević V, Sertić J<br />

Klinički zavod za laboratorijsku dijagnostiku, Klinički bolnički centar<br />

Zagreb, Zagreb, Hrvatska<br />

Kvaliteta analitičkog materijala kritični je čimbenik za<br />

kvalitetu rezultata laboratorijskih pretraga. Kako bi se liječnicima<br />

osigurali kvalitetni nalazi treba poštivati pravila<br />

dobre laboratorijske prakse i uvesti strategiju za prevenciju<br />

pogrješke odgovornim usvajanjem standardiziranog<br />

prijeanalitičkog postupka. Nepoštivanje prijeanalitičkih<br />

standarda uzrok je za oko 93% pogrješaka u dijagnostičkom<br />

laboratorijskom testiranju. Cilj rada bila je obrada<br />

ukupnih podataka o prijeanalitičkim pogrješkama na<br />

uzorcima bolesnika u svrhu dobivanja uvida u njihovu<br />

učestalost i broj te uspostava strategije za njihovo smanjenje.<br />

Istraživanje je obuhvatilo 237 600 uzoraka bolesnika<br />

od kojih je 3307 obilježeno prijeanalitičkim pogrješkama,<br />

<strong>Biochemia</strong> <strong>Medica</strong> 2006;16(Suppl 1):S1–S268<br />

S220<br />

acceptable and satisfactory. Myoglobin concentrations<br />

were determined by immunoturbidimetric method<br />

(Olympus AU 400 analyzer) and results estimated within<br />

the group of other methods (4 participants). cTnI concentrations<br />

were determined by RPIA method (Dade Behring<br />

Stratus CS analyzer) and the results estimated within the<br />

group of RPIA method (9 participants). The results estimated<br />

irrespective of the method used showed high variability<br />

(CV %) for myoglobin and cTnI (26.6% and 77.7%,<br />

respectively). Variability of the results estimated within<br />

the group was lower: 0.5%-31.4% for myoglobin and<br />

3.6%- 20.7% for cTnI. The variability of myoglobin results<br />

within the group of other methods (25.9%) was quite expected<br />

because of the small number of participants and<br />

group heterogeneity. The variability of cTnI results within<br />

the group of RPIA methods (6.1%) was lower as the result<br />

of group homogeneity. Accordingly, harmonization of<br />

cTnI results is necessary due to the high variability of results<br />

estimated regardless of the method. That is why cTnI<br />

methods with antibodies on epitopes on the stable part<br />

of the molecule are recommended. Although the results<br />

for myoglobin showed a higher degree of harmonization,<br />

the variability within the methods imposes the need of<br />

harmonization according to the certifi ed reference material.<br />

E-mail: mariana.kardum@zg.htnet.hr<br />

P22-4<br />

Evaluation of analytical systems<br />

Preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine:<br />

type and frequency<br />

Brkljačić V, Rogić D, Juričević V, Sertić J<br />

Clinical Institute of Laboratory Diagnosis, Zagreb University Hospital<br />

Center, Zagreb, Croatia<br />

The quality of analytical material is a factor critical for the<br />

quality of test results. To provide physicians with quality<br />

laboratory results, it is necessary to comply with the rules<br />

of good laboratory practice and to introduce strategy for<br />

error prevention by responsible adoption of standardized<br />

preanalytical procedure. Failure to comply with this<br />

standard is the cause of approximately 93% of errors in<br />

diagnostic laboratory testing. The aim of the study was to<br />

process all data on preanalytical errors in patient samples<br />

in order to get an insight in their frequency and number,<br />

and to establish a strategy for their reduction. The study<br />

included 237 600 patient samples; 3307 of them involved<br />

preanalytical errors, with 0.06%-2.4% relative frequency

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!