When the Shoe Fits - Oshorajneesh.com
When the Shoe Fits - Oshorajneesh.com When the Shoe Fits - Oshorajneesh.com
CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN eat, never otherwise. Man kills not only to eat, he enjoys killing. Hunting is a game for him. He will simply kill to kill – and no animal in the world kills his own brothers and sisters, no! A lion will not kill another lion, a monkey will not kill another monkey. Man is the only animal which kills other men. There is an in-built protection in every animal; zoologists say that every animal carries an in-built mechanism not to kill the same species. But it seems that something has gone wrong with man, he kills his own species. There is nothing like war in the animal world, although individuals fight. Animals have more understanding. If two dogs fight, sooner or later, within minutes, they come to an understanding. Man never comes to an understanding; unless he kills, there seems to he no solution. Even dogs are more intelligent. If two dogs bark, show their teeth, jump at each other, that is just a show, they are trying to feel the pulse, who is the stronger. It is a mock-fight. They have not yet started and when one feels that he is not so strong then he knows it is futile to fight. He simply shows with his tail – stop! And then the thing is finished, they have come to an understanding. A hierarchy is established – the stronger will of course win, so why go through a fight unnecessarily? Only man is foolish, the most foolish animal, because he will never believe’ that the weaker will be defeated and that the stronger will be victorious. It is ordinary arithmetic that the stronger will win, so why fight? There is no need. Hitler can bark at Stalin, Stalin can bark at Hitler and they can both call their mathematician and count who has the most airplanes, the most bombs. Within minutes the thing can be settled – then you just show by your tail. No need to go to war, because a war will only prove what can already be done on a table – that is, who the strongest is. Why such a wastage, such a wastage of human beings? But no, it is impossible. Human beings are such egoists that even the weaker thinks that somehow he is going to win. No animal deceives himself so much. Mock fights are there just to judge who is stronger, then it is finished. You will say of a dog who puts down his tail, that he is a coward. No, he is not, he is simply intelligent. He is weak, so what is the need to get into a fight? It is proved, and it is proved innocently without any bloodshed. The same thing is going to be proved even through a fight. Why go to war unnecessarily?’ This is more economical. AT THIS THE PRINCE ORDERED HIS ATTENDANTS TO MAKE A CONCERTED ATTACK. Look at the foolishness! Just to kill a monkey a concerted attack is needed, many men attacking the monkey from all sides. IN AN INSTANT THE MONKEY WAS SHOT FULL OF ARROWS AND FELL DEAD. And the Prince must have felt very good, he had done something. But look at the foolishness – a concerted attack by so many people, and with the Prince there must have been at least a hundred attendants. A hundred men killing a monkey and then feeling good, victorious. The monkeys must be laughing at what you have done. THE MONKEY WAS SHOT FULL OF ARROWS AND FELL DEAD. THEN THE PRINCE TURNED TO HIS COMPANION YEN PU’I.... And look how even in our foolishness we prove that we are wise! This Prince had killed unnecessarily and in no way could this be called a victory. Just to kill one monkey took a concerted attack of a hundred persons with arrows; and the monkey was without any weapon, naked, with no protection. Is it a victory? It is not a victory at all, it is not even diplomacy. Even ordinarily, if we fight a warrior, we give a weapon to the other. He must have a sword, he must have the same protection. They were all protected. But an unprotected innocent animal had been killed. The Prince is foolish, but look at his advice even from our foolishness we go on feeling that we are When the Shoe Fits 70 Osho
CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN wise. What did he say? He said to his companion, Yen Pu’i: ’YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENED? THIS ANIMAL ADVERTISED HIS CLEVERNESS, HE TRUSTED IN HIS OWN SKILL. HE THOUGHT NO ONE COULD TOUCH HIM. REMEMBER THAT! DO NOT RELY ON DISTINCTION AND TALENT WHEN YOU DEAL WITH MEN!’ This is one of the subtle things to be understood. We are always wise if we have to advise others but when we are in the same trap, with the same problem, the same crisis, we are not so wise. If somebody else comes to you with a problem, you will give him good advice and the advice may be right. But if you have the same problem you will not be able to give yourself the same advice. Why? Because when it is somebody else’s problem you are detached. This Prince told his companion: ’YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENED? THIS ANIMAL ADVERTISED HIS CLEVERNESS, HE TRUSTED IN HIS OWN SKILL. HE THOUGHT NO-ONE COULD TOUCH HIM. REMEMBER THAT! DO NOT RELY ON DISTINCTION AND TALENT WHEN YOU DEAL WITH MEN!’ He could see the foolishness of the monkey but he could not see the foolishness of what he had done. And, as I feel, he had done a more foolish thing than the monkey. He had also advertised his skill, he had also shown his talent, and not only with men but with monkeys too. He displayed who he was: hc was not an ordinary man, he was an extraordinary Prince. He was no ordinary mortal. And then he gave this advice to his friend: DO NOT RELY ON DISTINCTION AND TALENT WHEN YOU DEAL WITH MEN. But the advice is right. And it happened, as it happens many times, that the friend took the advice and it transformed his whole being. The Prince remained the same. So if you can learn, you can learn from fools also. If you cannot learn, even a Buddha is useless, you will not learn. And sometimes it happens that the people who advise you remain the same. If you can learn you can transform yourself. Sometimes teachers are left behind and disciples move fast and reach the goal. Because you can give good advice to others it doesn’t mean that you have attained that truth. This is good. The advice is beautiful and Tao says the same thing. Tao has the same teaching but not with the same mind as the Prince. Chuang Tzu has put the teaching in the Prince’s mouth but the Prince is just like a scholar, a pundit, who shows the words but who has not lived it through. It is not a live experience; it is just a doctrine. The Prince must have heard it from somewhere, from some Taoist source, because this is one of their keys. YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENED? THIS ANIMAL ADVERTISED HIS CLEVERNESS, HE TRUSTED IN HIS OWN SKILL. HE THOUGHT NO-ONE COULD TOUCH HIM. REMEMBER THAT! Don’t display, don’t exhibit, otherwise you will cause unnecessary troubles, you will invite unnecessary problems. You may even get so involved in it that it may prove your death. DO NOT RELY ON DISTINCTION AND TALENT WHEN YOU DEAL WITH MEN. This advice came from the mouth of the Prince. The friend was really a wise man because he wasn’t concerned whether the Prince himself followed what he was saying. And it SHOULD happen in life When the Shoe Fits 71 Osho
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER 1. WHEN THE SHOE FITS out f
- Page 21 and 22: 12 October 1974 am in Buddha Hall C
- Page 23 and 24: CHAPTER 2. THE TOWER OF THE SPIRIT
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 2. THE TOWER OF THE SPIRIT
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 2. THE TOWER OF THE SPIRIT
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 2. THE TOWER OF THE SPIRIT
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 2. THE TOWER OF THE SPIRIT
- Page 33 and 34: CHAPTER 2. THE TOWER OF THE SPIRIT
- Page 35 and 36: CHAPTER 3. FLIGHT FROM THE SHADOW A
- Page 37 and 38: CHAPTER 3. FLIGHT FROM THE SHADOW T
- Page 39 and 40: CHAPTER 3. FLIGHT FROM THE SHADOW n
- Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER 3. FLIGHT FROM THE SHADOW W
- Page 43 and 44: CHAPTER 3. FLIGHT FROM THE SHADOW W
- Page 45 and 46: CHAPTER 3. FLIGHT FROM THE SHADOW T
- Page 47 and 48: 14 October 1974 am in Buddha Hall C
- Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 4. FIGHTING COCK How does i
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 4. FIGHTING COCK And the eg
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER 4. FIGHTING COCK And now en
- Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER 4. FIGHTING COCK meaningles
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 4. FIGHTING COCK still gets
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 4. FIGHTING COCK The Sufi c
- Page 61 and 62: 15 October 1974 am in Buddha Hall C
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN talk abo
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN Chuang T
- Page 67 and 68: CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN repetiti
- Page 69: CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN point of
- Page 73 and 74: CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN But they
- Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN He didn
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN be a wif
- Page 79 and 80: CHAPTER 6. SYMPHONY FOR A SEABIRD v
- Page 81 and 82: CHAPTER 6. SYMPHONY FOR A SEABIRD d
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 6. SYMPHONY FOR A SEABIRD j
- Page 85 and 86: CHAPTER 6. SYMPHONY FOR A SEABIRD T
- Page 87 and 88: CHAPTER 6. SYMPHONY FOR A SEABIRD L
- Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER 6. SYMPHONY FOR A SEABIRD a
- Page 91 and 92: CHAPTER 6. SYMPHONY FOR A SEABIRD m
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS difference
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS Philosophy
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS All interp
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS no more an
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS child neve
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS window bec
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS real. Don
- Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER 8. THE TURTLE where your mi
- Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 8. THE TURTLE Ego leaves tr
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 8. THE TURTLE Eternal does
- Page 113 and 114: CHAPTER 8. THE TURTLE In the old da
- Page 115 and 116: CHAPTER 8. THE TURTLE precious ston
- Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER 8. THE TURTLE There is a pa
- Page 119 and 120: CHAPTER 8. THE TURTLE nearer the do
CHAPTER 5. MONKEY MOUNTAIN<br />
eat, never o<strong>the</strong>rwise. Man kills not only to eat, he enjoys killing. Hunting is a game for him. He will<br />
simply kill to kill – and no animal in <strong>the</strong> world kills his own bro<strong>the</strong>rs and sisters, no! A lion will not kill<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r lion, a monkey will not kill ano<strong>the</strong>r monkey. Man is <strong>the</strong> only animal which kills o<strong>the</strong>r men.<br />
There is an in-built protection in every animal; zoologists say that every animal carries an in-built<br />
mechanism not to kill <strong>the</strong> same species. But it seems that something has gone wrong with man,<br />
he kills his own species. There is nothing like war in <strong>the</strong> animal world, although individuals fight.<br />
Animals have more understanding. If two dogs fight, sooner or later, within minutes, <strong>the</strong>y <strong>com</strong>e to<br />
an understanding. Man never <strong>com</strong>es to an understanding; unless he kills, <strong>the</strong>re seems to he no<br />
solution. Even dogs are more intelligent. If two dogs bark, show <strong>the</strong>ir teeth, jump at each o<strong>the</strong>r, that<br />
is just a show, <strong>the</strong>y are trying to feel <strong>the</strong> pulse, who is <strong>the</strong> stronger. It is a mock-fight. They have not<br />
yet started and when one feels that he is not so strong <strong>the</strong>n he knows it is futile to fight. He simply<br />
shows with his tail – stop! And <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> thing is finished, <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>com</strong>e to an understanding. A<br />
hierarchy is established – <strong>the</strong> stronger will of course win, so why go through a fight unnecessarily?<br />
Only man is foolish, <strong>the</strong> most foolish animal, because he will never believe’ that <strong>the</strong> weaker will be<br />
defeated and that <strong>the</strong> stronger will be victorious. It is ordinary arithmetic that <strong>the</strong> stronger will win,<br />
so why fight? There is no need. Hitler can bark at Stalin, Stalin can bark at Hitler and <strong>the</strong>y can both<br />
call <strong>the</strong>ir ma<strong>the</strong>matician and count who has <strong>the</strong> most airplanes, <strong>the</strong> most bombs. Within minutes<br />
<strong>the</strong> thing can be settled – <strong>the</strong>n you just show by your tail. No need to go to war, because a war will<br />
only prove what can already be done on a table – that is, who <strong>the</strong> strongest is. Why such a wastage,<br />
such a wastage of human beings?<br />
But no, it is impossible. Human beings are such egoists that even <strong>the</strong> weaker thinks that somehow<br />
he is going to win. No animal deceives himself so much. Mock fights are <strong>the</strong>re just to judge who is<br />
stronger, <strong>the</strong>n it is finished. You will say of a dog who puts down his tail, that he is a coward. No, he<br />
is not, he is simply intelligent. He is weak, so what is <strong>the</strong> need to get into a fight? It is proved, and<br />
it is proved innocently without any bloodshed. The same thing is going to be proved even through a<br />
fight. Why go to war unnecessarily?’ This is more economical.<br />
AT THIS THE PRINCE ORDERED HIS ATTENDANTS TO MAKE A CONCERTED ATTACK. Look at<br />
<strong>the</strong> foolishness! Just to kill a monkey a concerted attack is needed, many men attacking <strong>the</strong> monkey<br />
from all sides. IN AN INSTANT THE MONKEY WAS SHOT FULL OF ARROWS AND FELL DEAD.<br />
And <strong>the</strong> Prince must have felt very good, he had done something. But look at <strong>the</strong> foolishness – a<br />
concerted attack by so many people, and with <strong>the</strong> Prince <strong>the</strong>re must have been at least a hundred<br />
attendants. A hundred men killing a monkey and <strong>the</strong>n feeling good, victorious. The monkeys must<br />
be laughing at what you have done.<br />
THE MONKEY WAS SHOT FULL OF ARROWS AND FELL DEAD. THEN THE PRINCE TURNED<br />
TO HIS COMPANION YEN PU’I.... And look how even in our foolishness we prove that we are wise!<br />
This Prince had killed unnecessarily and in no way could this be called a victory. Just to kill one<br />
monkey took a concerted attack of a hundred persons with arrows; and <strong>the</strong> monkey was without any<br />
weapon, naked, with no protection.<br />
Is it a victory? It is not a victory at all, it is not even diplomacy. Even ordinarily, if we fight a warrior,<br />
we give a weapon to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. He must have a sword, he must have <strong>the</strong> same protection. They<br />
were all protected. But an unprotected innocent animal had been killed.<br />
The Prince is foolish, but look at his advice even from our foolishness we go on feeling that we are<br />
<strong>When</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shoe</strong> <strong>Fits</strong> 70 Osho