When the Shoe Fits - Oshorajneesh.com

When the Shoe Fits - Oshorajneesh.com When the Shoe Fits - Oshorajneesh.com

oshorajneesh.com
from oshorajneesh.com More from this publisher
06.06.2013 Views

CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS at least the water is part of the ocean. And howsoever opposite the fire may be to the ice, they are degrees of the same phenomenon. Heat and cold are not two things, but the same energy. Energy becomes heat, the same energy becomes cold; the energy is the same, degrees differ. That’s why with one thermometer you can measure both heat and cold, because the energy is the same. Where does cold become heat, can you say exactly where? At which degree does the cold cease to be cold and become heat? You cannot say, it depends. Try a simple experiment. Put one hand, your left hand, on an ice cube and your right hand near a fire. Let the right hand become hot, let the left hand become cool. Then put both the hands together in a bucket of water and tell me whether it is cool or hot. You will be in difficulty, because one hand will say it is hot, and one hand will say it is cool, it is cold. What is it – cold or hot? They are degrees of the same energy. So I say to you, even to a well frog it is possible to communicate something about the sea. And if the messenger is really inventive, he can create devices to communicate. That is what a Buddha is doing, a Jesus is doing – creating devices to communicate something of the sea to well frogs – because there is one thing in common, the water. If there is one thing in common, then communication is possible, a bridge exists. Even to a dragonfly something can be communicated about ice. Even if we say it is not hot like the fire, something has been said about the ice – negative, of course. That is why all great scriptures are negative. They don’t say what truth is. They always say what truth is not, just to make the message meaningful to dragonflies. So we cannot say what the ice is, but we can say that the ice is not fire – this much can be communicated. But even by that method it is impossible to talk to a philosopher about the way of life, or to talk to a philosopher about existence. Even if the philosopher is an existentialist, then too it is impossible to talk about existence, because between a word and the corresponding reality there is no bridge. A rose and the word ’rose’ are not related in any way,’ all relationship is arbitrary. What is the relationship between the word ’rose’ – R,O,S,E – and the rose? If there is some relationship then you cannot call it GULAB. There are three hundred languages in the world and three hundred words for rose; there is no relationship, all relationship is arbitrary. Cold is related to hot, well is related to the ocean. Their relationship, howsoever indistinct, is there – real, not arbitrary. But between a word and reality there is no relationship, they are not related at all. So you can have your own words, a private language, you can call anything by any name. If you like to call it something else the rose will not fight in a court. And nobody can prove that their word is more correct than yours, nobody can prove it because no word is more correct or less correct – words are irrelevant, they are not related. And a philosopher lives in words. A philosopher is the falsest thing in existence, and the more you become philosophic, the less you live. Then you think about love, you never love, then you think about God, you never become divine. Then you go on talking and talking and talking and your whole energy is wasted in words, there is not a single moment to enter into existence. Chuang Tzu says be aware of all philosophies because their base is the same – they depend on words. And reality is not a word. Move into the real – you are real, existence is real – move into the When the Shoe Fits 104 Osho

CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS real. Don’t create a wall of words between you and reality otherwise it is impenetrable, you will be closed in, within your wall. And then it will become almost impossible to come out of it. Don’t be a philosopher – and everybody is a philosopher. It is difficult to find a man who is not a philosopher. Some philosophers are good, some bad, but everyone is a philosopher. Some are more logical, some are less, but everybody is a philosopher. Drop out of the trip – the trip of philosophy. Only then you enter the real, the existential. When the Shoe Fits 105 Osho

CHAPTER 7. AUTUMN FLOODS<br />

at least <strong>the</strong> water is part of <strong>the</strong> ocean. And howsoever opposite <strong>the</strong> fire may be to <strong>the</strong> ice, <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

degrees of <strong>the</strong> same phenomenon.<br />

Heat and cold are not two things, but <strong>the</strong> same energy. Energy be<strong>com</strong>es heat, <strong>the</strong> same energy<br />

be<strong>com</strong>es cold; <strong>the</strong> energy is <strong>the</strong> same, degrees differ. That’s why with one <strong>the</strong>rmometer you can<br />

measure both heat and cold, because <strong>the</strong> energy is <strong>the</strong> same. Where does cold be<strong>com</strong>e heat, can<br />

you say exactly where? At which degree does <strong>the</strong> cold cease to be cold and be<strong>com</strong>e heat? You<br />

cannot say, it depends.<br />

Try a simple experiment. Put one hand, your left hand, on an ice cube and your right hand near a<br />

fire. Let <strong>the</strong> right hand be<strong>com</strong>e hot, let <strong>the</strong> left hand be<strong>com</strong>e cool. Then put both <strong>the</strong> hands toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

in a bucket of water and tell me whe<strong>the</strong>r it is cool or hot. You will be in difficulty, because one hand<br />

will say it is hot, and one hand will say it is cool, it is cold. What is it – cold or hot? They are degrees<br />

of <strong>the</strong> same energy.<br />

So I say to you, even to a well frog it is possible to <strong>com</strong>municate something about <strong>the</strong> sea.<br />

And if <strong>the</strong> messenger is really inventive, he can create devices to <strong>com</strong>municate. That is what a<br />

Buddha is doing, a Jesus is doing – creating devices to <strong>com</strong>municate something of <strong>the</strong> sea to well<br />

frogs – because <strong>the</strong>re is one thing in <strong>com</strong>mon, <strong>the</strong> water. If <strong>the</strong>re is one thing in <strong>com</strong>mon, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>com</strong>munication is possible, a bridge exists.<br />

Even to a dragonfly something can be <strong>com</strong>municated about ice. Even if we say it is not hot like <strong>the</strong><br />

fire, something has been said about <strong>the</strong> ice – negative, of course. That is why all great scriptures are<br />

negative. They don’t say what truth is. They always say what truth is not, just to make <strong>the</strong> message<br />

meaningful to dragonflies. So we cannot say what <strong>the</strong> ice is, but we can say that <strong>the</strong> ice is not fire –<br />

this much can be <strong>com</strong>municated.<br />

But even by that method it is impossible to talk to a philosopher about <strong>the</strong> way of life, or to talk to<br />

a philosopher about existence. Even if <strong>the</strong> philosopher is an existentialist, <strong>the</strong>n too it is impossible<br />

to talk about existence, because between a word and <strong>the</strong> corresponding reality <strong>the</strong>re is no bridge.<br />

A rose and <strong>the</strong> word ’rose’ are not related in any way,’ all relationship is arbitrary. What is <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship between <strong>the</strong> word ’rose’ – R,O,S,E – and <strong>the</strong> rose? If <strong>the</strong>re is some relationship <strong>the</strong>n<br />

you cannot call it GULAB. There are three hundred languages in <strong>the</strong> world and three hundred words<br />

for rose; <strong>the</strong>re is no relationship, all relationship is arbitrary. Cold is related to hot, well is related to<br />

<strong>the</strong> ocean. Their relationship, howsoever indistinct, is <strong>the</strong>re – real, not arbitrary.<br />

But between a word and reality <strong>the</strong>re is no relationship, <strong>the</strong>y are not related at all. So you can<br />

have your own words, a private language, you can call anything by any name. If you like to call<br />

it something else <strong>the</strong> rose will not fight in a court. And nobody can prove that <strong>the</strong>ir word is more<br />

correct than yours, nobody can prove it because no word is more correct or less correct – words are<br />

irrelevant, <strong>the</strong>y are not related. And a philosopher lives in words. A philosopher is <strong>the</strong> falsest thing<br />

in existence, and <strong>the</strong> more you be<strong>com</strong>e philosophic, <strong>the</strong> less you live. Then you think about love,<br />

you never love, <strong>the</strong>n you think about God, you never be<strong>com</strong>e divine. Then you go on talking and<br />

talking and talking and your whole energy is wasted in words, <strong>the</strong>re is not a single moment to enter<br />

into existence.<br />

Chuang Tzu says be aware of all philosophies because <strong>the</strong>ir base is <strong>the</strong> same – <strong>the</strong>y depend on<br />

words. And reality is not a word. Move into <strong>the</strong> real – you are real, existence is real – move into <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>When</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Shoe</strong> <strong>Fits</strong> 104 Osho

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!