05.06.2013 Views

local agenda 21 local plan for sustainable development of bistriþa ...

local agenda 21 local plan for sustainable development of bistriþa ...

local agenda 21 local plan for sustainable development of bistriþa ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In conclusion, water supplied by the distribution<br />

network <strong>of</strong> Bistrita municipality appears to be safe. No<br />

hydric epidemics were recorded during the period<br />

mentioned.<br />

The Bistrita River<br />

Water quality in the last three years<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

2001 2002 2003<br />

- Monthly water sampling <strong>for</strong> the “Bistrita intake”<br />

section was organised in 2003 in order to determine<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> the fresh surface waters used in drinking<br />

water in Bistrita municipality. Laboratory<br />

measurements include physical, chemical and<br />

microbiological analysis. Data processing was<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med according to the “Quality standards<br />

obligatory <strong>for</strong> surface waters used in drinking water<br />

production” and the “Standards related to the<br />

measurement methods and sampling frequency and<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> water samples used in producing drinking<br />

water”, approved by H.G. 100/07.02.2002.<br />

The following resulted from the interpretation <strong>of</strong> data<br />

from monthly sampling campaigns in the section<br />

where drinking water is produced:<br />

- the water quality in this section is <strong>of</strong> category A2<br />

from a physical and chemical point <strong>of</strong> view due to<br />

values recorded under the ammonium indicator. The<br />

following indicators also recorded values higher than<br />

category A1: suspensions (January, March – 2<br />

samples), CCO-Cr (March – 3 samples, April, July and<br />

October), CBO5 (October) and Mn (January).<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> microbiological indicators, the following<br />

was observed:<br />

Bacteriological<br />

excesses<br />

Chemical excesses<br />

Total samples<br />

20<br />

MUNICIPALITY<br />

- For colibacilus, the sampling done in March,<br />

April, October and November place the water quality<br />

in category A2 (542÷4,900 coli/100ml). In May, June,<br />

July, August, September and December the water<br />

quality was category A3 (5,420÷16,090 coli/100ml).<br />

- For all samples, values <strong>for</strong> faecal coli, faecal<br />

streptococcus and salmonella place the water quality<br />

in category A1.<br />

• The slow flux and the fast daily and weekly<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation flow, part <strong>of</strong> the fast in<strong>for</strong>mation flow <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Water Quality Monitoring, which measures<br />

surface running water quality and the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

pollution, was per<strong>for</strong>med at the Sarata section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

river Bistrita.<br />

The data provided shows there were situations when<br />

discharged water was insufficiently cleaned by<br />

industrial firms and public administration services.<br />

The following situations were recorded and compared<br />

with the ‘Standard <strong>for</strong> reference objectives in<br />

classifying the quality <strong>of</strong> surface waters’:<br />

Sarata section: the minimum value recorded <strong>for</strong> the<br />

indicator CCO-Mn was 2.8mg/l, while the maximum<br />

value was 11mg/l. In April and July, the recorded<br />

value <strong>of</strong> CCO-Mn <strong>of</strong> 11 mg/l was higher than M.A.C.<br />

compared to the 2nd quality category (reference<br />

objective, 10mg/l) due to the hydrological and weather<br />

conditions in that period.<br />

+<br />

As <strong>for</strong> N-NH4 indicator, the minimum value recorded<br />

was 0.54 mg N/l, while the maximum value was<br />

10.66mg N/l. The continuous exceeding <strong>of</strong> this<br />

indicator compared with the 2nd quality category

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!