05.06.2013 Views

Your Daily Poison - Pesticide Action Network UK

Your Daily Poison - Pesticide Action Network UK

Your Daily Poison - Pesticide Action Network UK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 <strong>Pesticide</strong>s in water<br />

In this section we compare official data from<br />

the government’s Drinking Water Inspectorate<br />

(DWI) with the results we have obtained from<br />

questionnaire survey of both the water<br />

companies who report to the DWI, summarised<br />

in Table 4 (Appendix 6a and 6b), and local<br />

authorities, summarised in Table 6 (Appendix<br />

6c). Local authorities are responsible for<br />

private water supplies, but conduct only a<br />

small number of tests. Indications of ubiquitous<br />

contamination of drinking water at low levels<br />

are confirmed through the PAN <strong>UK</strong> survey. A<br />

gap in the protection of health from potentially<br />

harmful pesticides in water, due to the limited<br />

number of pesticides tested for, is revealed.<br />

According to the official data from the<br />

government’s Drinking Water Inspectorate,<br />

pesticides in water are a minor and diminishing<br />

cause for concern 26 . The legal limit, set by the<br />

European Commission, is 0.1 micrograms per<br />

litre, or one part in ten billion, for a single<br />

pesticide, 0.5 micrograms per litre for the sum<br />

of detectable concentrations of individual<br />

pesticides, and 0.03 micrograms per litre for<br />

the pesticides aldrin, dieldrin, heptachlor and<br />

heptachlor epoxide 27 (persistent organochlorine<br />

pesticides now banned in the <strong>UK</strong> and globally<br />

under the Stockholm Convention, but still<br />

detected many years after their use). Only 18<br />

‘exceedances’ of the legal limit for pesticides<br />

were detected in 2004. This is a decrease from<br />

31 in 2003 and 72 in 2002. However, data<br />

gathered in the PAN <strong>UK</strong> survey (see Table 4)<br />

indicates that drinking water contains low<br />

levels of pesticides. Looking in detail at both<br />

the public and private water supply, the<br />

presence of pesticides is confirmed in both raw<br />

Table 4. <strong>Pesticide</strong>s in the public water supply.<br />

Summary of PAN <strong>UK</strong> survey – Appendix 6a, page 39<br />

PAN <strong>UK</strong> Questionnaires sent to: All 26 water companies in England and<br />

Wales, Scottish Water, and the<br />

Northern Ireland Drinking Inspectorate<br />

Number of responses received: In 2004 (2002 data) In 2005 (2004<br />

data)<br />

12 12<br />

Number of companies reporting<br />

10 or more pesticides found<br />

above 0.01 micrograms per litre<br />

(below the legal limit) in raw<br />

(untreated) water<br />

4 5<br />

Number of companies reporting<br />

10 or more pesticides found<br />

above 0.01 micrograms per<br />

litre (below the legal limit)<br />

in drinking (treated) water<br />

4 5<br />

12<br />

(untreated), and drinking water at levels which<br />

are below the legal limit, but above the limit of<br />

detection. As the EC legal limit was intended to<br />

achieve zero pesticides in drinking water on a<br />

precautionary basis 28 , our evidence indicates<br />

that, to maintain this objective, the legal limit<br />

needs to be lowered to the levels at which<br />

pesticides can now be detected. Harmful<br />

effects are suspected to risk, in particular, the<br />

foetus. The health effects of a lifetime’s<br />

exposure to a mixture of chemicals at low<br />

levels is unknown.<br />

Of the twelve water companies who received<br />

and responded to our survey, seven companies<br />

completed the section in our questionnaire<br />

which asked them to report the levels of<br />

pesticides found below the legal limit, but<br />

above the limit of detection. In Appendix 6b we<br />

present the highest occurrences: atrazine,<br />

isoproturon, mecoprop, propyzamide and<br />

simazine are all being detected in a high<br />

number of tests. According to Southern Water,<br />

atrazine occurred in 62.6 per cent of drinking<br />

water samples, and simazine in 43.2 per cent<br />

of drinking water samples. Numerous other<br />

pesticides are routinely detected in a lower<br />

percentage of tests. The water companies<br />

varied in their facility to extract data in the<br />

format of our information request.<br />

According to the Drinking Water Inspectorate,<br />

aldin, dieldrin, heptachlor and heptachlor<br />

epoxide are ‘generally are not found in water<br />

sources 29 ’. These are obsolete pesticides,<br />

banned since the 1980s on health grounds,<br />

which have not had approved uses in the <strong>UK</strong><br />

for many years. However, the PAN <strong>UK</strong> survey<br />

showed that these pesticides are present in<br />

water.<br />

Of the respondents to PAN <strong>UK</strong>’s survey who<br />

disclosed details about pesticides tested for,<br />

and detected at levels below the legal limit, but<br />

above the limit of detection, the following water<br />

companies reported in their questionnaire<br />

return the presence of these pesticides in raw<br />

or treated water: Bristol, Dee Valley, Essex &<br />

Suffolk, Mid Kent, Northumbrian, Southern,<br />

South Staffordshire, Sutton & East Surrey,<br />

Wessex. Aldrin, dieldrin and heptachlor are<br />

classified carcinogens and endocrine<br />

disruptors according to international<br />

authorities 30 . Some studies have found banned<br />

pesticides, including these, occurring in<br />

rainwater 31 indicating that they persist in the<br />

<strong>Your</strong> daily poison

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!