05.06.2013 Views

Your Daily Poison - Pesticide Action Network UK

Your Daily Poison - Pesticide Action Network UK

Your Daily Poison - Pesticide Action Network UK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 Food residues<br />

PAN <strong>UK</strong> has conducted an analysis of residues<br />

both from the <strong>UK</strong> government’s testing<br />

programme (2004 results) and from the<br />

European Union testing programme (2003,<br />

latest results), identifying the occurrence of<br />

pesticides of particular concern for human<br />

health. There are serious issues about<br />

potential health effects, particularly on the<br />

unborn, babies, and toddlers. For example,<br />

recent research suggests that exposure to<br />

carcinogens in the uterus or early childhood<br />

can damage DNA and heighten susceptibility<br />

to disease later in life 15 . Children can consume<br />

a disproportionate level of pesticide residues<br />

because of their high consumption relative to<br />

their bodyweight.<br />

Europe<br />

Levels of residues in food across Europe have<br />

remained high. The latest figures from the<br />

European Commission’s monitoring<br />

programme indicate that conventionally<br />

produced food is as contaminated with<br />

pesticides as in 2002 (Appendix 5a). In a new<br />

report 16 the EC acknowledges that toxic<br />

chemicals in food are a risk to the health of<br />

children and vulnerable adults, reporting<br />

breaches of safety limits which are a significant<br />

risk to health. According to PAN Europe,<br />

‘These results show a complete failure of the<br />

EU in controlling the level of pesticides in our<br />

food 17 .’ Countries which test a relatively high<br />

number of samples, such as Germany, detect<br />

a higher number of residues. The number of<br />

samples tested per head of the population in<br />

the <strong>UK</strong> is the lowest in Europe with the<br />

exception of Portugal 18 .<br />

According to the data from the European<br />

survey, babies and toddlers are at risk from<br />

residues of some of the most acutely toxic<br />

pesticides detected in tests. At the residue<br />

levels found, a toddler could consume well over<br />

the health-based safety limit, the amount that<br />

can be safely consumed in one meal or one<br />

day, see Acute Reference Dose, ARfD, page<br />

22. This would equate to 147% of chlorpyrifos<br />

in table grapes, 164% of methamidophos in<br />

sweet peppers, over twice the limit of<br />

endosulfan, over five times the limit of<br />

triazophos in sweet peppers and a staggering<br />

ten times the limit of methomyl – 1035% – in<br />

table grapes.<br />

<strong>UK</strong><br />

The government’s <strong>Pesticide</strong> Residues<br />

Committee (PRC) runs a programme of<br />

residue testing jointly paid for by a levy on<br />

agrochemical companies and by government<br />

funding. The official source of data on<br />

pesticides used in the <strong>UK</strong> is the Central<br />

Science Laboratory’s <strong>Pesticide</strong> Usage Survey<br />

Group data 19 . This is a sample of approximately<br />

2,000 <strong>UK</strong> farms. The PRC acknowledges that<br />

‘the range of pesticides that may be used in<br />

agriculture and food production, either in this<br />

country or abroad, is very wide. About 350<br />

active substances are currently approved for<br />

use as agricultural pesticides in the <strong>UK</strong> and<br />

over 850 are approved in one or more EU<br />

states. Potentially around 1,000 different<br />

chemicals might be sought 20 .’ Yet the PRC only<br />

tested for 123 pesticides in 2004 21 .<br />

Results from the <strong>UK</strong> government’s testing<br />

programme (Appendix 5b) indicate rising levels<br />

of residues – 25 per cent of foods sampled in<br />

2003 contained pesticide residues, and the<br />

figure rose to 31 per cent in 2004. Residues<br />

below or at the legal limit (the Maximum<br />

Residue Level, see page 22) contaminated 30<br />

per cent of samples (24 per cent in 2003), and<br />

above the legal limit 1 per cent of samples<br />

(less than 1 per cent in 2003).<br />

One sample of round lettuce was found to<br />

contain inorganic bromide at between 2.9 and<br />

5.4 times the ARfD for children and adults.<br />

One sample of lettuce imported was found to<br />

contain two residues above the legal limit (the<br />

MRL, page 22) of endosulfan and<br />

methamidophos. A risk assessment for<br />

methamidophos estimated exposure at 9.3<br />

times the ARfD for children. According to the<br />

PRC, ‘Short-term negative effects on people’s<br />

health are unlikely, but sensitive children might<br />

briefly have symptoms such as sweating,<br />

producing too much saliva or stomachs’ [sic,<br />

presumably stomach ache]. One sample of<br />

imported speciality beans (yard-long beans)<br />

contained two residues above the legal limit. A<br />

risk assessment for triazophos showed that<br />

intakes for adults and infants were 1.7 and 3<br />

times the ARfD 22 .<br />

PAN <strong>UK</strong> has collated the <strong>UK</strong> data and<br />

established the known hazards to health of the<br />

residues found in it. This indicates that<br />

consumers are being exposed to pesticides<br />

the second <strong>UK</strong> pesticide exposure report 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!