the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
05.06.2013 Views

ancient Near East. What is more, although m. Kelim 12.7 is presented as evidence to support a headdress, this would presume that the coin had already lost its value as a coin. In other words, coins pierced for use as an ornament would have little value as a coin. 61 The woman’s diligent search presents a threefold question: “Does not one light a lamp and sweep the house and seek diligently until she finds it?” She lights a lamp and sweeps the house, expecting to hear the coin tinkle, since the house would have had little natural light, 62 because, if it had windows, the windows would be small. The Greek word and the phrase represent her diligent and exhaustive efforts. When she has found it, she calls together her friends and neighbours to rejoice with her. It is preferable to view the gender of her friends and neighbours in this verse as feminine, in contrast to those of the Lost Sheep. Once again, as in the parable of the Lost Sheep, communal joy over the found is experienced, again with the analogy to the joy experienced in 63 heaven. Even though ‘the angels of God’ in v. 10 replaces ‘in heaven’ in v. 7, it carries the same meaning, with the parallel between the rejoicing of the shepherd/the woman, with his/her friends and neighbours, and that of God with the angels in heaven. 6-3-2. The Interpretation of the Parable With regard to a female reading of this parable, Durber argues that these parables in Luke 15 are sexist, on the basis of a patriarchal culture, revealing a lack of images of women, in particular in the parable of the Prodigal Son, or presenting images which are in themselves sexist. In addition to that, she assumes that these parables are addressed to men, not to women. Even though the Lost Sheep and the Lost Coin are parallels, for Durber there are significant differences, in that the readers less closely identify themselves with the female domestic than with the male owner of sheep. She assumes from both introductions, of v. 4 (“If one of you”) and v. 8 (“Or again if a woman”), and that the woman’s comparison with God is less obvious in the parable of the Lost Coin, than the shepherd in the parable of the Lost Sheep, for, while the shepherd is referred to as God inthe greater joy in heaven’, the 61. Derrett, “Fresh Light on the Lost Sheep and the Lost Coin,” 40-41; Susan Marie Praeder, The Word in Women’s Worlds: Four Parables (Wilmington: Michael Glazier, 1988), 39; Hultgren, Parables, 66; Snodgrass, Stories with Intent, 114. 62. Beaten earth or stone was commonly used to make floors of houses. Near Capernaum in particular basalt was plentiful, which were used for floors. Peter Richardson, Building Jewish in the Roman East (Waco, Tex: Baylor University Press, 2004), 76-81. 63. A.F. Walls, “‘In the Presence of the Angels’ Luke 15:10,” NovT 3 (1959), 314-16. 73

woman is simply compared to the angels in the phrase ‘the joy among the angels of God’. 64 However, her arguments are well countered by Batten, who contends that the parable of the Lost Son subverts the patriarchal values by the father focusing on the unity of the family rather than on the matter of honour and dishonour. 65 What is more, the phrase ‘the angels of God’, is simply a circumlocution as reverential expression, and not reference to the woman. On the other hand, Barbara Reid contends that in the parable, Jesus aligns himself with ‘Woman Wisdom’ as ‘Sophia’ incarnate, who searches for the simple among human beings (Prov 1:20-23; 8:1-5), and asks all to her banquet (Prov 9:1-11), comforting those who feel 66 lost, and challenging those who are leaders of the community. Although her observations give insight into the applications of the parable, yet I cannot find any connection between these verses of Proverbs and the parable. Beavis claims that the stories about women in the Bible have been misidentified in traditional patriarchal interpretation through Santor’s quilt which betrays the fact that these 67 women in the five stories have been misrepresented as sexual sinners in spite of all the innocent women. She concludes that Luke 15:10 is also the distorted epigrammatic formulation of the general principle by malestream or patriarchal interpretation, and suggests a corrected epigrammatic formulation of the general principle as follows: “Likewise, I tell you, the angels of God rejoice more over one innocent person who is vindicated than over the repentance of the sinners who have abused them.” 68 Despite the fact that v. 10 (or v. 7) plainly focuses on the repentance of one sinner, it is incorrect to place the emphasis of v. 10 (or v. 7) upon one innocent person. In addition, it is overspeculation that women listeners, as opposed to a male audience, get a different message, since they identify themselves with biblical women whose virtues have been distorted into vices in the patriarchal interpretation. 69 On the contrary, it depends rather on how the audience feel themselves, that is, as the righteous person or sinful person, as opposed to identifying with men or women. What we can say at the very least is that it is not only something new and surprising for 64. Susan Durber, “The Female Reader of the Parables of the Lost,” JSNT 45 (1992), 59-79, here 70-72. 65. A. Batten, “Dishonour, Gender and the Parable of the Prodigal Son,” TJT 13 (1997), 187-200. 66. Barbara E. Reid, “Beyond Petty Pursuits and Wearisome Widows: Three Lukan Parables,” Int 56 (2002), 284-94, here 288-89. 67. Eve (Gen. 1-3), Huldah (2Kgs 22; 2 Chron. 34), Mary Magdalene (Mt. 27:56, 61; 28:1; Mk. 15:40, 47; Lk. 8:2; 24:10; Jn 19:25; 20:1, 18), the Samaritan woman (Jn 4:7-30) and Martha (Lk. 10:38-42; Jn 11:1-44). 68. Mary Ann Beavis, (ed.), “Joy in Heaven, Sorrow on Earth: Luke 15:10,” in The Lost Coin: Parables of Women, Work and Wisdom (Sheffield Academic Press, 2002), 39-45, here 44-45. 69. Even Beavis says that v. 10 controls the reader’s interpretation of the three parables in Luke 15. Beavis, “Joy in Heaven, Sorrow on Earth: Luke 15:10,” 39-40. 74

ancient Near East. What is more, although m. Kelim 12.7 is presented as evidence to support<br />

a headdress, this would presume that <strong>the</strong> co<strong>in</strong> had already lost its value as a co<strong>in</strong>. In o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, co<strong>in</strong>s pierced for use as an ornament would have little value as a co<strong>in</strong>. 61<br />

The woman’s diligent search presents a threefold question: “Does not one light a lamp<br />

and sweep <strong>the</strong> house and seek diligently until she f<strong>in</strong>ds it?” She lights a lamp and sweeps <strong>the</strong><br />

house, expect<strong>in</strong>g to hear <strong>the</strong> co<strong>in</strong> t<strong>in</strong>kle, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> house would have had little natural light,<br />

62<br />

because, if it had w<strong>in</strong>dows, <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dows would be small. The Greek word and<br />

<strong>the</strong> phrase represent her diligent and exhaustive efforts.<br />

When she has found it, she calls toge<strong>the</strong>r her friends and neighbours to rejoice with her. It<br />

is preferable to view <strong>the</strong> gender <strong>of</strong> her friends and neighbours <strong>in</strong> this verse as fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong><br />

contrast to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lost Sheep. Once aga<strong>in</strong>, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lost Sheep,<br />

communal joy over <strong>the</strong> found is experienced, aga<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong> analogy to <strong>the</strong> joy experienced <strong>in</strong><br />

63<br />

heaven. Even though ‘<strong>the</strong> angels <strong>of</strong> God’ <strong>in</strong> v. 10 replaces ‘<strong>in</strong> heaven’ <strong>in</strong> v. 7, it carries <strong>the</strong><br />

same mean<strong>in</strong>g, with <strong>the</strong> parallel between <strong>the</strong> rejoic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shepherd/<strong>the</strong> woman, with<br />

his/her friends and neighbours, and that <strong>of</strong> God with <strong>the</strong> angels <strong>in</strong> heaven.<br />

6-3-2. The Interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parable<br />

With regard to a female read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this parable, Durber argues that <strong>the</strong>se <strong>parables</strong> <strong>in</strong> Luke 15<br />

are sexist, on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> a patriarchal culture, reveal<strong>in</strong>g a lack <strong>of</strong> images <strong>of</strong> women, <strong>in</strong><br />

particular <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prodigal Son, or present<strong>in</strong>g images which are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

sexist. In addition to that, she assumes that <strong>the</strong>se <strong>parables</strong> are addressed to men, not to<br />

women. Even though <strong>the</strong> Lost Sheep and <strong>the</strong> Lost Co<strong>in</strong> are parallels, for Durber <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

significant differences, <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> readers less closely identify <strong>the</strong>mselves with <strong>the</strong> female<br />

domestic than with <strong>the</strong> male owner <strong>of</strong> sheep. She assumes from both <strong>in</strong>troductions, <strong>of</strong> v. 4<br />

(“If one <strong>of</strong> you”) and v. 8 (“Or aga<strong>in</strong> if a woman”), and that <strong>the</strong> woman’s comparison with<br />

God is less obvious <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lost Co<strong>in</strong>, than <strong>the</strong> shepherd <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Lost Sheep, for, while <strong>the</strong> shepherd is referred to as God <strong>in</strong> ‘<strong>the</strong> greater joy <strong>in</strong> heaven’, <strong>the</strong><br />

61. Derrett, “Fresh Light on <strong>the</strong> Lost Sheep and <strong>the</strong> Lost Co<strong>in</strong>,” 40-41; Susan Marie Praeder, The Word <strong>in</strong><br />

Women’s Worlds: Four Parables (Wilm<strong>in</strong>gton: Michael Glazier, 1988), 39; Hultgren, Parables, 66; Snodgrass,<br />

Stories with Intent, 114.<br />

62. Beaten earth or stone was commonly used to make floors <strong>of</strong> houses. Near Capernaum <strong>in</strong> particular basalt<br />

was plentiful, which were used for floors. Peter Richardson, Build<strong>in</strong>g Jewish <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Roman East (Waco, Tex:<br />

Baylor University Press, 2004), 76-81.<br />

63. A.F. Walls, “‘In <strong>the</strong> Presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Angels’ Luke 15:10,” NovT 3 (1959), 314-16.<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!