the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
therefore, must associate with sinners, who from a shepherding point of view, are lost so as to seek out and save the lost. Jesus demonstrated that the kingdom is present through his reception and eating with sinners. In this respect, the story is to be indirectly a kingdom parable. On the other hand, in relation to the imagery of a shepherd as the religious leaders of Israel, Bailey’s argument is right in that Jesus is here saying that the Pharisees and scribes, as the current religious leaders, have failed to tend the flock of Israel. It is not correct, however, that the responsibility for being lost attributes to the shepherd in the parable on the grounds that in Middle Eastern culture one is reluctant to ascribe blame to oneself, 51 for any portrayal of a bad shepherd is not found in the parable. In any event, it is at least clear, from an audience perspective, that the actions of the shepherd in the parable immediately draw a comparison between the imagery of a shepherd in terms of success and failure. On this level, the parable may charge the religious leaders at that time with not doing their task in searching for the lost. The parable above all centers around seeking and joy. Audiences should not only see the love of the searcher, that is to say, how much value the shepherd places on the lost by taking the risk of leaving the ninety-nine in the wilderness and laying it on his shoulders, but also the immense joy of heaven in finding the lost on earth: “he calls together his friends and his neighbours, saying to them, Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost,” and “there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who have no need of repentance” in vv. 6-7. While the love of the searcher is, in particular, concerned with sinners and tax collectors, the great joy of finding the lost has to do more intimately with Pharisees and scribes, implicitly conveying cessation of animosity 52 towards Jesus’ actions with sinners. In addition, there is a premium on a soteriological theme that includes even the outcast with limitless grace, thereby showing the concern of God for the marginalized. 53 This is also one of the dominant themes of the Gospel of Luke. 6-3. The Parable of the Lost Coin (8-10) 51. Bailey contends that instead of a saying that ‘I’ lost the sheep, in Middle Eastern culture they are used to expressing that ‘the sheep’ went astray. Bailey, Finding the Lost, 66-67. 52. Kilgallen, The Twenty Parables of Jesus in the Gospel of Luke, 102. 53. Bailey finds a redemptive motif in the sense that the shepherd pays a physical cost to restore the sheep by placing it on his shoulders, whereas Derrett seeks a redemptive motif in that the bringing of the lamb is necessary preparation for the Passover. The latter however seems, to excessively stretch the point of soteriological themes. Bailey, Finding the Lost, 75-76; Derrett, Fresh Light on the Lost Sheep and the Lost Coin,” 44-45; Forbes, The God of Old: The Role of the Lukan Parables in the Purpose of Luke’s Gospel, 124. 71
6-3-1. The Analysis of the Parable The parable is generally called the twin of the parable of the Lost Sheep, just as 13:18-21 (Mustard Seed and Leaven) and 14:28-32 (Building a Tower and King Going to War), since they share the same meaning. In addition, for Luke, it is a frequent occurrence to find pairs of accounts with men and women. 54 Although there are negative feelings towards women among Jesus’ contemporaries, there is, as I have already pointed out in the Lost Sheep, not the least intention to stimulate resentment toward the Pharisees and scribes with the mention of a woman as the protagonist in the parable. 55 Unlike the previous parable, Jesus here does not begin with the phrase ‘what woman from you’, to compare his audience to a woman, but rather the parable takes up ‘Or what woman’. Nevertheless, the story, as in the parable of the Lost Sheep, does follow the logic of ‘How much more!’, i.e. logic that progresses from the lesser to the greater. If a woman will look industriously for a lost coin and rejoice at finding it, how much more will God search for a 56 lost one and rejoice at finding that one? One drachma was offered as one day’s wage for a day worker, and was usually equal to a 57 denarius in the first century. Although the value of ten drachmas is not small, she could be reckoned as rather poor, for that would explain well her diligent search. 58 With respect to the coin, Jeremias suggests that the woman in the parable may have worn a headdress on which the ten coins would have been strung together, 59 whereas Bailey suggests that the coin may have been the woman’s necklace. 60 However, coins pierced were not customary in the 54. Cf. 1:6-7; 2:36-38; 4:25, 38; 7:11-15, 36-50; 8:1-3, 19-21, 43-56; 10:38-42; 11:27; 13:10-17. It may be a Lukan strategy to highlight the role of women. There is a similar rabbinic parable to that of the ten coins in which the lost one symbolizes the words of the Torah. The phrase used in the parable to search for the lost one (a sela or an obol) is striking: “he lights ‘lamp after lamp’, ‘wick after wick’ until he finds it.” Cant. Rab. 1.9. 55. Against this argument, see Bailey, Poet and Peasant, 158; idem, Finding the Lost, 93, and Hultgren, Parables, 64. 56. Snodgrass, Stories with Intent, 113. 57. See Tob. 5:14. The word ‘drachma’ is mentioned only here in vv. 8-9 and seven times in the LXX (Gen. 24:22; Exod 39:2; Tob. 5:14; 2 Macc. 4:19; 10:20; 12:43; 3 Macc. 3:28). Marshall thinks that Luke would have translated the amount into coinage familiar to his readers, saying the fact that in 300 B.C. a drachma represents the value of a sheep, but during the first century had been considerably devalued. Marshall, Luke, 603. 58. Fitzmyer, The Gospel According to Luke, 1081; Hultgren, Parables, 66. Jülicher, as opposed to this extrapolation, imagines that she is not poor but belongs to the middle class. Jülicher , Die Gleichnisreden Jesu, 316-17. Schottroff even claims that a woman would have received half a drachma for a day’s wage. Schottroff, The Parables of Jesus, 154. 59. Jeremias, Parables, 134-35. 60. Bailey, Poet and Peasant, 157. He suggests later that the woman in the parable may be the one entrusted with the financial management of the home, and therefore the ten coins represent the woman’s life savings. Bailey, Finding the Lost,102-103. 72
- Page 29 and 30: estore their power and sense of dra
- Page 31 and 32: Secondly, irrespective of how the p
- Page 33 and 34: of the framing structure and in the
- Page 35 and 36: Part II An Analysis of the Lukan Pa
- Page 37 and 38: sever relations with the preceding
- Page 39 and 40: of neighbour, the lawyer would beli
- Page 41 and 42: the Samaritans clearly appears not
- Page 43 and 44: the kingdom breaks abruptly into on
- Page 45 and 46: 2. The Friend at Midnight (11:5-8)
- Page 47 and 48: With respect to v. 8 there are thre
- Page 49 and 50: (the petitioner) The noun , there
- Page 51 and 52: although he knows that it is second
- Page 53 and 54: The rich man in the parable intends
- Page 55 and 56: the parable. V. 21 is a repetition
- Page 57 and 58: either pointing to the meaning of t
- Page 59 and 60: ear fruit (Lev 19:23), 14 whereas B
- Page 61 and 62: parable, namely the three years and
- Page 63 and 64: 5. The Great Banquet (14: 15-24) 5-
- Page 65 and 66: symposia give the background for un
- Page 67 and 68: through Jesus’ ministry. Furtherm
- Page 69 and 70: ecause it is ready.’ People shoul
- Page 71 and 72: In addition to Kilgallen’s view,
- Page 73 and 74: and maintaining sociability and the
- Page 75 and 76: version in the Gospel of Truth may
- Page 77 and 78: shoulders may be commonplace from a
- Page 79: imagination and are unconvincing. I
- Page 83 and 84: woman is simply compared to the ang
- Page 85 and 86: With respect to the authenticity of
- Page 87 and 88: and Scott contend that the practice
- Page 89 and 90: distance from them is not merely ge
- Page 91 and 92: 20:12), as I have pointed out, the
- Page 93 and 94: iniquity, rather than seeking to fi
- Page 95 and 96: . 127 The father leaves the decisio
- Page 97 and 98: the younger son here represents the
- Page 99 and 100: giving too much to his children. 14
- Page 101 and 102: 7. The Parable of the Unjust Stewar
- Page 103 and 104: simply the house. Moreover, it is m
- Page 105 and 106: kingdom of God, a new epoch has ope
- Page 107 and 108: might be an exception to the rule o
- Page 109 and 110: means to give the steward time for
- Page 111 and 112: contends Derrect, is that it is an
- Page 113 and 114: econsider and re-evaluate their und
- Page 115 and 116: prohibition of usury might have had
- Page 117 and 118: followers are strongly encouraged t
- Page 119 and 120: wealth faithfully, it is to express
- Page 121 and 122: here and now, not a revolutionary a
- Page 123 and 124: ministry. In addition, the correct
- Page 125 and 126: similarities between the Gallus and
- Page 127 and 128: Jewish story on the grounds of Deut
- Page 129 and 130: wealth. 27 At that time, this impor
<strong>the</strong>refore, must associate with s<strong>in</strong>ners, who from a shepherd<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view, are lost so as to<br />
seek out and save <strong>the</strong> lost. Jesus demonstrated that <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom is present through his<br />
reception and eat<strong>in</strong>g with s<strong>in</strong>ners. In this respect, <strong>the</strong> story is to be <strong>in</strong>directly a k<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />
parable. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> imagery <strong>of</strong> a shepherd as <strong>the</strong> religious leaders <strong>of</strong><br />
Israel, Bailey’s argument is right <strong>in</strong> that Jesus is here say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> Pharisees and scribes, as<br />
<strong>the</strong> current religious leaders, have failed to tend <strong>the</strong> flock <strong>of</strong> Israel. It is not correct, however,<br />
that <strong>the</strong> responsibility for be<strong>in</strong>g lost attributes to <strong>the</strong> shepherd <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable on <strong>the</strong> grounds<br />
that <strong>in</strong> Middle Eastern culture one is reluctant to ascribe blame to oneself, 51<br />
for any portrayal<br />
<strong>of</strong> a bad shepherd is not found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable. In any event, it is at least clear, from an<br />
audience perspective, that <strong>the</strong> actions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shepherd <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable immediately draw a<br />
comparison between <strong>the</strong> imagery <strong>of</strong> a shepherd <strong>in</strong> <strong>terms</strong> <strong>of</strong> success and failure. On this level,<br />
<strong>the</strong> parable may charge <strong>the</strong> religious leaders at that time with not do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir task <strong>in</strong> search<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for <strong>the</strong> lost.<br />
The parable above all centers around seek<strong>in</strong>g and joy. Audiences should not only see <strong>the</strong><br />
love <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> searcher, that is to say, how much value <strong>the</strong> shepherd places on <strong>the</strong> lost by tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>ety-n<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> wilderness and lay<strong>in</strong>g it on his shoulders, but also<br />
<strong>the</strong> immense joy <strong>of</strong> heaven <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> lost on earth: “he calls toge<strong>the</strong>r his friends and his<br />
neighbours, say<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>m, Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep which was lost,” and<br />
“<strong>the</strong>re will be more joy <strong>in</strong> heaven over one s<strong>in</strong>ner who repents than over n<strong>in</strong>ety-n<strong>in</strong>e<br />
righteous people who have no need <strong>of</strong> repentance” <strong>in</strong> vv. 6-7. While <strong>the</strong> love <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> searcher<br />
is, <strong>in</strong> particular, concerned with s<strong>in</strong>ners and tax collectors, <strong>the</strong> great joy <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> lost has<br />
to do more <strong>in</strong>timately with Pharisees and scribes, implicitly convey<strong>in</strong>g cessation <strong>of</strong> animosity<br />
52<br />
towards Jesus’ actions with s<strong>in</strong>ners. In addition, <strong>the</strong>re is a premium on a soteriological<br />
<strong>the</strong>me that <strong>in</strong>cludes even <strong>the</strong> outcast with limitless grace, <strong>the</strong>reby show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> concern <strong>of</strong><br />
God for <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alized. 53<br />
This is also one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>the</strong>mes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke.<br />
6-3. The Parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lost Co<strong>in</strong> (8-10)<br />
51. Bailey contends that <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> a say<strong>in</strong>g that ‘I’ lost <strong>the</strong> sheep, <strong>in</strong> Middle Eastern culture <strong>the</strong>y are used to<br />
express<strong>in</strong>g that ‘<strong>the</strong> sheep’ went astray. Bailey, F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Lost, 66-67.<br />
52. Kilgallen, The Twenty Parables <strong>of</strong> Jesus <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke, 102.<br />
53. Bailey f<strong>in</strong>ds a redemptive motif <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that <strong>the</strong> shepherd pays a physical cost to restore <strong>the</strong> sheep by<br />
plac<strong>in</strong>g it on his shoulders, whereas Derrett seeks a redemptive motif <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lamb is<br />
necessary preparation for <strong>the</strong> Passover. The latter however seems, to excessively stretch <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong><br />
soteriological <strong>the</strong>mes. Bailey, F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Lost, 75-76; Derrett, Fresh Light on <strong>the</strong> Lost Sheep and <strong>the</strong> Lost Co<strong>in</strong>,”<br />
44-45; Forbes, The God <strong>of</strong> Old: The Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Purpose <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Gospel, 124.<br />
71