05.06.2013 Views

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. The Rich Fool (12:13-21)<br />

3-1. The Literary Context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parable<br />

12:4-7 and 12:13-34 1 deal with issues <strong>of</strong> fear, anxiety, and security under <strong>the</strong> motif <strong>of</strong><br />

confidence, judgment and accountability. The <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> 12:4-7, “not to fear” is repeated and<br />

stressed <strong>in</strong> 12:13-34 once aga<strong>in</strong>. The parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rich Fool belongs to <strong>the</strong> section <strong>of</strong> 12:13-<br />

34 which can be divided <strong>in</strong>to three parts such as <strong>the</strong> Rich Fool (12:13-21), <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong><br />

anxiety regard<strong>in</strong>g daily needs (12:22-31), and <strong>the</strong> say<strong>in</strong>gs concern<strong>in</strong>g wealth (12:32-34). With<br />

reference to <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong> where <strong>the</strong> material <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rich Fool comes from,<br />

though Marshall argues that <strong>the</strong> parable belongs to Q material ow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> similarity<br />

between Mt 6:19 and 12:13-21, 2<br />

also is similar to Mt 6:19.<br />

it is unlikely for <strong>the</strong> parable to be Q material because 12:33<br />

Vv. 13-14 and v. 15 are open to question <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al unity <strong>of</strong> 12:13-21. Many<br />

3<br />

commentators consider that vv. 13-14 is made up <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong>dependent say<strong>in</strong>gs, namely<br />

a separate say<strong>in</strong>g, and that v. 15 is used to make <strong>the</strong> transition to <strong>the</strong> parable by Luke.<br />

Jeremias argues that on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Thomas 63 and 72, 4 vv. 13-15 does not<br />

belong orig<strong>in</strong>ally to <strong>the</strong> parable, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> two (vv. 13-14 and vv. 16-21) were not l<strong>in</strong>ked but<br />

separated <strong>in</strong> Gos. Thom. 5 Yet I th<strong>in</strong>k that Gos. Thom. 63 doesn’t prove anyth<strong>in</strong>g about <strong>the</strong><br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al connection <strong>in</strong> Luke, for ra<strong>the</strong>r, I believe, that <strong>the</strong> Gos. Thom. more likely depends on<br />

<strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke, <strong>in</strong> that it is clearly secondary. 6<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Fitzmyer seeks to<br />

demonstrate that <strong>the</strong>se say<strong>in</strong>gs were orig<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong>dependent by mak<strong>in</strong>g use <strong>of</strong> Gos. Thom.,<br />

1. It is desirable to view 12:13-34 as one section with logical consistency ra<strong>the</strong>r than 12:4-59 or 12:1-13:9.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to observation <strong>of</strong> T.D. Stegman by Hermogenes’s Progymnastic Exercise, 12:13-34 has a steady,<br />

coherent literary unit <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g eight steps <strong>of</strong> Hermogenes. T.D. Stegman, “Read<strong>in</strong>g Luke 12:13-34 as an<br />

Elaboration <strong>of</strong> a Chreia: How Hermogenes <strong>of</strong> Tarsus Sheds Light on Luke’s Gospel,” NovT 49 (2007), 328-352.<br />

See also A.J. Malherbe, “The Christianization <strong>of</strong> a Topos (Luke 12:13-34),” NovT 38 (1996), 123-35.<br />

2. Marshall, Luke, 521-22.<br />

3. Bultmann, The History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptic Tradition, 23, 55; Jeremias, Parables, 165; Fitzmyer, The Gospel<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Luke, 968; C.F. Evans, Sa<strong>in</strong>t Luke, 520; Nolland, Luke, 683-84.<br />

4. Gos. Thom. 63: “Jesus said: There was a rich man who had many possessions. He said, I will use my<br />

possessions that I may sow and reap and plant and fill my storehouses with fruit, so that I may lack noth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

There were his thoughts <strong>in</strong> his heart. And <strong>in</strong> that night he died. He who has ears, let him hear.”<br />

Gos. Thom. 72: “[A man said] to him: Speak to my bro<strong>the</strong>rs that <strong>the</strong>y divide my fa<strong>the</strong>r’s possessions with me.<br />

He said to him: O man, who made me a divider? He turned to his disciples (and) said to <strong>the</strong>m: I am not a divider,<br />

am I?”<br />

5. Jeremias, Parables, 164-65.<br />

6. For a critical standpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Thomas, see H. Montefiore and H. Tierner, Thomas and <strong>the</strong><br />

Evangelists, Studies <strong>in</strong> Biblical Theology, 35 (Naperville: Alec R. Allensen, 1962), 50; Ray Summers, The<br />

Secret Say<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Liv<strong>in</strong>g Jesus (Waio: Word, 1968), 46: H. Schürmann, Traditionsgeschichte Untersuchungen<br />

zu den synoptischen Evangelien (Düsseldorf: Patmos Verlag, 1968), 232.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!