the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Istituto Biblico, 2008. Kim, K.-J. Stewardship and Almsgiving in Luke’s Theology . JSNTSup, 155; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998. Kim, S. The Origin of Paul’s Gospel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1982. Kimball, C.A. Jesus’ Exposition of the Old Testament in Luke’s Gospel. JSNTSup, 94; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1994. Kingsbury, J.D. “The Pharisees in Luke-Acts,” in The Four Gospels 1992: Restschrift Frans Neirynck, F. Van Segbroeck (ed.). vol. 2. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1992, 1497-1512. ——, Conflict in Luke: Jesus, Authorities, Disciples. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991. ——, Jesus Christ in Matthew, Mark and Luke. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1981. ——, Matthew as Story. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986. Kinman, Brent, Jesus’ Entry into Jerusalem: In the Context of Lukan Theology and the Politics of His Day. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1995. Kissinger, W.S. The Parables of Jesus: A History of Interpretation and Bibliography. New Jersey: Scarecrow, 1979. Kistemaker, S.J. “The Structure of Luke’s Gospel,” JETS 25 (1982), 33-39. ——, The Parables of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1980. Klauck, H-J. Allegorie und Allegorese in Synoptischen Gleichnistexten. NTAbh, 13; Münster: Aschendorff, 1978. Kloppenborg, J.S. “The Dishonoured Master,” Bib 70 (1989), 474-495. ——, “The Parable of the Prodigal Son and Deeds of Gift,” NovT 130 (2008), 169-194. Klutz, Todd, The Exorcism Stories in Luke-Acts: A Sociostylistic Reading. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2004. Knight, George W. “Luke 16:19-31: The Rich Man and Lazarus,” RevExp 94 (1997), 277-283. Koch, D.A. “The God-Fearers between Facts and Fiction: Two Theosebeis-Inscriptions from Aphrodisias and Their Bearing for the New Testament,” Studia Theologica, 60 (2006), 62-90. Kodell, Jerome “Luke and the Children: The Beginning and End of the Great Interpolation (Luke 9:46-56; 18:9-23),” CBQ 49 (1987), 415-430. Koenig, J. New Testament Hospitality: Partnership with Strangers as Promise and Mission. OBT, 17; Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985. Kosmala, Hans, “The Parable of the Unjust Steward in the Light of Qumran,” ASTI 3 (1964), 114-121. Köster, H. “,” TDNT, VII, 553-555. Kraabel, A.T. “The Disappearance of the ‘God-Fearers,’” Numen 28 (1981), 113-26. ——, “The God-Fearers Meet the Beloved Disciple,” The Future of Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Helmut Koester, B.A. Pearson (ed.). Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991, 276-284. Krämer, M. Das Rätsel der Parabel vom ungerechten Verwalter, Lk 16:1-13. Zürich: PAS, 1972. Kraybill, D.B. and Sweetland, D.M. “Possessions in Luke-Acts: A Sociological Perspective,” Perspectives in Religious Studies, 10 (1983), 215-39. Kuhn, K.G. “,” TDNT, VI, 727-744. Kümmel, W.G. Promise and Fulfilment: The Eschatological Message of Jesus. London: SCM Press, 1957. Kurz, W.S. ‘The Function of Christological Proof from Prophecy for Luke and Justin,’ PhD dissertation, Yale University, 1976. ——, “Luke-Acts and Historiography in the Greek Bible,” SBLSP 19 (1980) 283-300. LaHurd, C.S. “Re-viewing Luke 15 with Arab Christian women” in A feminist companion to Luke, Amy-Jill Levine with Marianne Blickenstaff (ed.). London: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002, 246-68. 331
Lake, K. “Proselytes and God-Fearers,” The Beginnings of Christianity. V. in The Acts of the Apostles, F.J. Foakes Jackson and K. Lake (eds.). 5 vols.; London: Macmillan, 1933, 74-96. Lambrecht, J. “Reading and Rereading Lk 18:31-22:6,” À cause de ι’Évangile, (1985), 585-612. ——, “The Message of the Good Samaritan (Lk 10:25-27),” LouvStud 5 (1974), 121-135. ——, Once More Astonished: The Parables of Jesus. New York: Crossroad, 1981. Landry, David & May, Ben, “Honor Restored: New Light on The Parable of The Prudent Steward (Luke 16:1-8a),” JBL 119 (2000), 287-309. Laverdiere, Eugene A. and Thompson,William G. “New Testament Communities in Transition: A Study of Matthew and Luke,” TS 37 (1976), 567-97. Leaney, A.C.R. A Commentary on the Gospel according to St. Luke. BNTC; London: A. & C. Black, 1958. Lehtipuu, Outi, “Characterization and Persuasion: The Rich Man and The Poor Man in Luke 16:19- 31,” in Characterization in the Gospel: Reconceiving Narrative Criticism. David Rhoads and Kari Syreeni (eds.). Sheffield; Sheffield Academic Press, 1990, 73-105. ——, The Afterlife Imagery in Luke’s Story of the Rich Man and Lazarus. NovTSup 123. Leiden: Brill, 2007. Lenski, R.C.H. The Interpretation of St. Luke’s Gospel. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1946. Levine, Amy-Jill, “Luke’s Pharisees,” in In Quest of the Historical Pharisees, Jacob Neusner and Bruce D. Chilton (eds.). Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press, 2007, 113-130. Liddell, H.G., Scott, R., and Jones, H.S. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford, 1977. Liebenberg, Jacobus, The Language o f the Kingdom and Jesus: Parable, Aphorism, and Metaphor in the Sayings Material Common to the Synoptic Tradition and the Gospel of Thomas. BZNW 102; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2001. Lieber, Andrea, “I set a Table before You: The Jewish Eschatological Character of Aseneth’s Conversion Meal,” JSP 14.1 (2004), 63-77. Lieberman, S. “On Sins and Their Punishment,” in Tests and Studies. New York: Ktav, 1974, 33-48. Liefeld, W.L. “Parables on Prayer (Luke 11:5-10; 18:1-8; 18:9-14),” in The Challenge of Jesus’ Parables, R. N. Longenecker (ed.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans Publishing, 2000, 240- 262. ——, Luke, The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984. Lieu, J.M. “Circumcision, Women and Salvation,” NTS 40 (1994), 358-70. ——, “The Race of the God-Fearers,” JTS 46 (1995), 483-501. ——, The Gospel of Luke. Peterborough: Epworth, 1997. Linnemann, E. The Parables of Jesus: Introduction and Interpretation. London: SPCK, 1966. Litwak, K.D. Echoes of Scripture in Luke-Acts: Telling the History of God’s People Intertextually. JSNTSup, London: T & T Clark International, 2005. Liu, P. “Did the Lucan Jesus Desire Voluntary Poverty of His Followers?” EvQ 64 (1992), 291-317. Loader, W. “Jesus and the Rogue in Luke 16:1-8a: The Parable of the Unjust Steward,” RB 96 (1989), 518-32. Lockwood, G.J. “The Reference to Order in Luke’s Preface,” Concordia Theological Quarterly 59 (1995), 101-104. Longenecker, B.W. “A Humorous Jesus? Orality, Structure and Characterisation in Luke 14:15-24, and Beyond,” BibInt 16 (2008), 179-204. Longenecker, Richard N. (ed.), “Taking up the Cross Daily: Discipleship in Luke-Acts,” in Patterns of Discipleship in the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans Publishing, 1996, 50- 76. ——, “The Acts of the Apostles,” in Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Frank E. Gaebelein (ed.). Grand 332
Page 1 and 2:
THE ROLE OF THE LUKAN PARABLES IN T
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgements Even though writin
Page 5 and 6:
6-3. The Parables of The Lost Coin
Page 7 and 8:
Abbreviations AB Anchor Bible ABD D
Page 9 and 10:
SVTQ Saint Vladimir’s Theological
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1. Research
Page 13 and 14:
the Lukan parables, examining the t
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2 A History of Research of
Page 17 and 18:
parables, the soliloquies function
Page 19 and 20:
links between the parables and thei
Page 21 and 22:
Peasant and The Oriental Versions.
Page 23 and 24:
Greg W. Forbes 59 sets out not only
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 3 A Methodological basis fo
Page 27 and 28:
those of the evangelists. “There
Page 29 and 30:
estore their power and sense of dra
Page 31 and 32:
Secondly, irrespective of how the p
Page 33 and 34:
of the framing structure and in the
Page 35 and 36:
Part II An Analysis of the Lukan Pa
Page 37 and 38:
sever relations with the preceding
Page 39 and 40:
of neighbour, the lawyer would beli
Page 41 and 42:
the Samaritans clearly appears not
Page 43 and 44:
the kingdom breaks abruptly into on
Page 45 and 46:
2. The Friend at Midnight (11:5-8)
Page 47 and 48:
With respect to v. 8 there are thre
Page 49 and 50:
(the petitioner) The noun , there
Page 51 and 52:
although he knows that it is second
Page 53 and 54:
The rich man in the parable intends
Page 55 and 56:
the parable. V. 21 is a repetition
Page 57 and 58:
either pointing to the meaning of t
Page 59 and 60:
ear fruit (Lev 19:23), 14 whereas B
Page 61 and 62:
parable, namely the three years and
Page 63 and 64:
5. The Great Banquet (14: 15-24) 5-
Page 65 and 66:
symposia give the background for un
Page 67 and 68:
through Jesus’ ministry. Furtherm
Page 69 and 70:
ecause it is ready.’ People shoul
Page 71 and 72:
In addition to Kilgallen’s view,
Page 73 and 74:
and maintaining sociability and the
Page 75 and 76:
version in the Gospel of Truth may
Page 77 and 78:
shoulders may be commonplace from a
Page 79 and 80:
imagination and are unconvincing. I
Page 81 and 82:
6-3-1. The Analysis of the Parable
Page 83 and 84:
woman is simply compared to the ang
Page 85 and 86:
With respect to the authenticity of
Page 87 and 88:
and Scott contend that the practice
Page 89 and 90:
distance from them is not merely ge
Page 91 and 92:
20:12), as I have pointed out, the
Page 93 and 94:
iniquity, rather than seeking to fi
Page 95 and 96:
. 127 The father leaves the decisio
Page 97 and 98:
the younger son here represents the
Page 99 and 100:
giving too much to his children. 14
Page 101 and 102:
7. The Parable of the Unjust Stewar
Page 103 and 104:
simply the house. Moreover, it is m
Page 105 and 106:
kingdom of God, a new epoch has ope
Page 107 and 108:
might be an exception to the rule o
Page 109 and 110:
means to give the steward time for
Page 111 and 112:
contends Derrect, is that it is an
Page 113 and 114:
econsider and re-evaluate their und
Page 115 and 116:
prohibition of usury might have had
Page 117 and 118:
followers are strongly encouraged t
Page 119 and 120:
wealth faithfully, it is to express
Page 121 and 122:
here and now, not a revolutionary a
Page 123 and 124:
ministry. In addition, the correct
Page 125 and 126:
similarities between the Gallus and
Page 127 and 128:
Jewish story on the grounds of Deut
Page 129 and 130:
wealth. 27 At that time, this impor
Page 131 and 132:
imply that he remained unburied, 41
Page 133 and 134:
netherworld for his bad deeds which
Page 135 and 136:
of the preaching of the resurrectio
Page 137 and 138:
about religion or theology.” 74 E
Page 139 and 140:
9. The Judge and the Widow (18: 1-8
Page 141 and 142:
addition, such a formula also appea
Page 143 and 144:
The Old Testament taught the Israel
Page 145 and 146:
two court systems, for religious m
Page 147 and 148:
authoritative teacher. The adjectiv
Page 149 and 150:
however, no evidence to support his
Page 151 and 152:
interweaves the two points in the a
Page 153 and 154:
floating saying of Jesus, it comes
Page 155 and 156:
Josephus, the NT and rabbinic liter
Page 157 and 158:
they are portrayed as robbers, murd
Page 159 and 160:
collector on a par with swindlers,
Page 161 and 162:
eyes to heaven,” 59 “beating hi
Page 163 and 164:
humbles himself will be exalted”
Page 165 and 166:
subverts the expectation of the aud
Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 5 The Theological Themes of
Page 169 and 170:
Joachim Jeremais, New Testament The
Page 171 and 172:
the captives and recovering of sigh
Page 173 and 174:
preferentially opts for the poor li
Page 175 and 176:
marginalized, it is natural that he
Page 177 and 178:
Others link complete renunciation o
Page 179 and 180:
a symbolic function for possessions
Page 181 and 182:
possessions and give alms to the po
Page 183 and 184:
lessing prayer of the disciples bef
Page 185 and 186:
the Canticles, proclaims the fulfil
Page 187 and 188:
the Lord Jesus. Jesus’ prayer in
Page 189 and 190:
tells stories and composes prayers
Page 191 and 192:
4. Conversion Of the parables that
Page 193 and 194:
sources regarding conversion texts,
Page 195 and 196:
and behaviour required of people to
Page 197 and 198:
gives a promise to do fourfold rest
Page 199 and 200:
the crowd in Jerusalem and Agrippa.
Page 201 and 202:
formation. 28 Secondly, conversion
Page 203 and 204:
eligion. 37 However, Bailey fails t
Page 205 and 206:
comes to a conclusion that conversi
Page 207 and 208:
1-1. Lk 19:44 2 E.E. Ellis feels th
Page 209 and 210:
Linking 19:38a with the prefiguring
Page 211 and 212:
1-4. Lk 19:28 16 17 J. Székely agr
Page 213 and 214:
this context. It seems intended so
Page 215 and 216:
2. The Interpretational Approaches
Page 217 and 218:
main focus seems to be on reconcili
Page 219 and 220:
doing, he notes that Luke in partic
Page 221 and 222:
Luke made use of material available
Page 223 and 224:
which prevail in Hellenistic and bi
Page 225 and 226:
Jesus’ words and deeds have a fun
Page 227 and 228:
e) 11:14-36 e’) 17:11-37 Healing
Page 229 and 230:
arrangement that offer the Journey
Page 231 and 232:
truth.” 40 Rather than simply on
Page 233 and 234:
in the travel narrative Luke’s pu
Page 235 and 236:
number of cycles of the Writings (t
Page 237 and 238:
travel narrative, Luke integrates t
Page 239 and 240:
Promised Land. The Lukan exodus mot
Page 241 and 242:
3. Christological and Ecclesiologic
Page 243 and 244:
the Journey also requires total aba
Page 245 and 246:
ut also teaches that it is our task
Page 247 and 248:
eschatological crisis has arisen fr
Page 249 and 250:
the judge saying, “vindicate me a
Page 251 and 252:
presented as love and forgiveness.
Page 253 and 254:
officials would have had the compet
Page 255 and 256:
Luke’s readers would have been ab
Page 257 and 258:
the church through the activity of
Page 259 and 260:
Gentile believers who are heirs to
Page 261 and 262:
proclaiming its universal message,
Page 263 and 264:
Sterling mentions, to understand Ch
Page 265 and 266:
the new context of the Hellenistic
Page 267 and 268:
was modeled on that of Israel, and
Page 269 and 270:
defend him against the charges and
Page 271 and 272:
Stein, unlike Conzelmann’s conten
Page 273 and 274:
follows, I will explore the purpose
Page 275 and 276:
c) just as they were delivered to u
Page 277 and 278:
of Greek historiography, both in ge
Page 279 and 280:
as a neutral force for various reas
Page 281 and 282:
separate groups, since according to
Page 283 and 284:
desired impact of his works on read
Page 285 and 286:
traditional arrangement of the mate
Page 287 and 288:
doctrinal correctness. 73 In any ev
Page 289 and 290: accepted because of their response
Page 291 and 292: Christians by means of this ethos o
Page 293 and 294: early Christians were divided, howe
Page 295 and 296: 2-2-2-1. Gentile Christians Many sc
Page 297 and 298: offer plausible causes concerning t
Page 299 and 300: understanding Luke’s view of the
Page 301 and 302: P. Esler feels that the primary con
Page 303 and 304: Luke seeks to reassure his readers
Page 305 and 306: Luke looks backwards on the Scriptu
Page 307 and 308: superficial and fickle in their res
Page 309 and 310: Paul’s sermons, God has raised Je
Page 311 and 312: 3. The Role of the Lukan Parables i
Page 313 and 314: instruction for the Christian life,
Page 315 and 316: oppressed, to proclaim the acceptab
Page 317 and 318: prayer, Christians must seek to kno
Page 319 and 320: Jerusalem. Jesus’ goal in Luke is
Page 321 and 322: problems, and that it is fairly har
Page 323 and 324: likely challenge the faith-life of
Page 325 and 326: Nations,” in Jesus and the Herita
Page 327 and 328: Bockmuehl, Markus, “Why not Let A
Page 329 and 330: Biblical Association of America, 19
Page 331 and 332: ——, “The Delineation of the L
Page 333 and 334: ——, “The Pharisee and the Pub
Page 335 and 336: University Press, 1980. Gerhardsson
Page 337 and 338: ——, “An Unfinished Story abou
Page 339: Johnson, L.T. “On Finding the Luk
Page 343 and 344: Matera, Frank J. “Jesus’ Journe
Page 345 and 346: Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press
Page 347 and 348: Phillips, T.E. “Reading Recent Re
Page 349 and 350: Robert H. Stein, “The Genre of th
Page 351 and 352: Sherwin-White, A. N. Rome Society a
Page 353 and 354: of the Fig-Tree Pericope in Mark’
Page 355 and 356: Warden, Duane, “The Rich Man and
Page 357 and 358: Abstract For the most part, Lukan p
Page 359 and 360: Abstrak Die Lukas-gelykenisse is al
show all

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?