the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Holmgren, Fred C. “The Pharisee and the Tax Collector: Luke 18:9-14 and Deuteronomy 26:1-15,” Int 48 (1994), 252-261. Houlden, J.L. “The Purpose of Luke,” JSNT 21 (1984), 53-65. Hoyt, T. ‘The Poor in Luke-Acts,’ PhD dissertation, Duke University, 1975. Huffard, E.W. “The Parable of the Friend at Midnight: God’s Honour or Man’s Persistence?” ResQ 21 (1978), 154-160. Hughes, Frank W. “The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) and Graeco-Roman Rhetoric,” in Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, Stanley E. Porter and Thomas H. Olbricht (eds.). JSNTSup 90; England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993, 29-41. Hultgren, Arland J. “Interpreting the Gospel of Luke,” Int 30 (1976), 353-65. ——, The Parables of Jesus: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000. Hultgren, Stephen, “The Apostolic Church’s Influence on the Order of Sayings in the Double Tradition. Part II: Luke’s Travel Narrative,” ZNW 100 (2009), 199-222. Hunter, A.M. Interpreting the Parables. London: SCM Press, 1960. ——, The Parables Then and Now. London, 1971. Ireland, D.J. Stewardship and the Kingdom of God: An Historical, Exegetical and Contextual Study of the Parable of the Unjust Steward in Luke 16:1-13. NovTSup, 70; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1992. Jackson, Paul Norman, “Allegiance to Jesus from the Transfiguration to his Death in Luke’s Gospel,” Southwestern Journal of Theology 40 (1997), 48-62. James, W. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Collier MacMillan, 1961. Janoff, Bulman R, Shattered Assumptions: Towards a new Psychology of trauma. New York: The Free Press, 1992. Jeremias, J. Rediscovering the Parables, London: SCM Press, 1966. ——, New Testament Theology: The Proclamation of Jesus, Vol. 1. London: SCM Press Ltd, 1971. ——, “Tradition und Redaktion in Lukas 15,” ZNW 62 (1971), 172-189. ——, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. London: SCM Press, 1969. ——, The Parables of Jesus. London: SCM Press, 1972. Jervell, J, “God’s Faithfulness to the Faithless People: Trends in Interpretation of Luke-Acts,” WW 12 (1992), 29-36. ——, “Paul: The Teacher of Israel: The Apologetic Speeches of Paul in Acts,” in Luke and the People of God: A New Look at Luke-Acts. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1972, 153-83. ——, “Retrospect and Prospect in Luke-Acts Interpretation,” in SBL Seminar Paper 1991, E.H. Lovering (ed.). Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1991, 383-404. ——, “The Church of Jews and Godfearers,” in Luke-Acts and the Jewish People: Eight Critical Perspectives, J.B. Tyson (ed.). Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1988, 11-20. ——, “The Divided People of God: The Restoration of Israel and Salvation for the Gentiles,” in Luke and the People of God: A New Look at Luke-Acts. Minneapolis, Minn.: Augsburg Pub. House, 1979, 41-74. ——, Luke and the People of God: A New Look at Luke-Acts. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1972. ——, The Unknown Paul: Essays on Luke-Acts and Early Christian History. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984. Joel Marcus, Mark 1-8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 27; New York: Doubleday, 2000. Johnson, A.F. “Assurance for Man: The Fallacy of Translating Anaideia by ‘Persistence’ in Luke 11:5- 8,” JETS 22 (1979), 123-131. 329
Johnson, L.T. “On Finding the Lukan Community: A Cautious Cautionary Essay,” SBL 1979 Seminar Papers. Missoula, Mont.: Scholars Press, 1979, 87-100. ——, Sharing Possessions: Mandate and Symbol of Faith. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1981. ——, The Gospel of Luke. Sacra Pagina, 3, Collegeville, MN: Liturgical, 1991. ——, The Literary Function of Possessions in Luke-Acts, SBLDS 39, Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1977. ——, “Literary Criticism of Luke-Acts: Is Reception-History Pertinent?,” JSNT 28 (2005), 159-62. Jones, G.V. The Art and Truth of the Parables. London: SPCK, 1964. Jones, Ivor H. The Matthean Parables: A Literary and Historical Commentary. NovTSup 80, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995. Jones, Peter R. Studying the Parables of Jesus. Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 1999. ——, The Teaching of the Parables. Nashville: Broadman, 1982. Joubert, S.J. “The Jerusalem community as role-model for a cosmopolitan group: A socio-literary analysis of Luke’s symbolic universe,” Neotestamentica 29 (1995), 49-59. Juel, D. Luke-Acts: The Promise of History. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press, 1983. Jülicher, A. Die Gleichnisreden Jesu. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976. Kanagaraj, J. Jeyaseelan, “Good News to the Poor in the New Testament,” Good News to the Poor: The Challenge to the Church, Sebastian C.H. Kim and Krickwin C. Marak (eds.). ISPCK, 1998, 40. Kariamadam, P. “The Composition and Meaning of the Lucan Travel Narrative (Lk 9:51-19:46),” Bible Bhashyam 13 (1987), 179-198. Karris, R.J. “Missionary communities: a new paradigm for the study of Luke-Acts,” CBQ 41 (1979), 80-97. ——, “Poor and Rich: The Lukan Sitz-im-Leben,” Perspectives on Luke-Acts, C.H. Talbert (ed.). Danville, VA/Edinburgh: Association of Baptist Professors of Religion/ T & T Clark, 1978, 112- 25. ——, Jesus and the Marginalized in John’s Gospel. Collegeville: Michael Glazier, 1990. ——, Prayer and the New Testament. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 2000. ——, What Are They Saying About Luke and Acts. New York: Paulist Press, 1979. Käsemann, E. Essays on New Testament Themes. London: SCM Press, Ltd., 1964. ——, Perspectives on Paul. London: SCM Press, 1971. Kazen, Thomas, “Sectarian Gospels for Some Christians? Intention and Mirror Reading in the Light of Extra-Canonical Texts,” NTS 51 (2005), 561-78. Keesmaat, Sylvia C. “Strange Neighbors and Risky Care,” in The Challenge of Jesus’ Parables, R.N. Longenecker (ed.). Grand Rapids: Michigan, 2000, 263-285. Kern, Philip H. “Paul’s Conversion and Luke’s Portrayal of Character in Acts 8-10,” TynBul 54 (2003), 63-80. Kilbourne, Brock and Richardson, James T. “Paradigm Conflict, Types of Conversion, and Conversion Theories,” Sociological Analysis 50 (1989), 1-21. Kilgallen, J.J. “Forgiveness of sins (Luke 7:36-50),” NovTest 49 (2007), 105-116. ——, “Luke 15 and 16: A Connection,” Bib 78 (1997), 369-376. ——, “The Importance of the Redactor in Luke 18:9-14,” Bib 79 (1998), 69-75. ——, “The Pharisee and the Publican (Luke 18:9-14): The Point?” ExpTim 114 (2003), 157-159. ——, “The Plan of the ‘NOMIKOΣ’ (Luke 10:25-37),” NTS 42 (1996), 615-19. ——, “The Purpose of Luke’s Divorce Text (16:18),” Bib 76 (1995), 229-38. ——, The Twenty Parables of Jesus in the Gospel of Luke. SubBib 32, Roma, Editrice Pontificio 330
Page 1 and 2:
THE ROLE OF THE LUKAN PARABLES IN T
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgements Even though writin
Page 5 and 6:
6-3. The Parables of The Lost Coin
Page 7 and 8:
Abbreviations AB Anchor Bible ABD D
Page 9 and 10:
SVTQ Saint Vladimir’s Theological
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1. Research
Page 13 and 14:
the Lukan parables, examining the t
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2 A History of Research of
Page 17 and 18:
parables, the soliloquies function
Page 19 and 20:
links between the parables and thei
Page 21 and 22:
Peasant and The Oriental Versions.
Page 23 and 24:
Greg W. Forbes 59 sets out not only
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 3 A Methodological basis fo
Page 27 and 28:
those of the evangelists. “There
Page 29 and 30:
estore their power and sense of dra
Page 31 and 32:
Secondly, irrespective of how the p
Page 33 and 34:
of the framing structure and in the
Page 35 and 36:
Part II An Analysis of the Lukan Pa
Page 37 and 38:
sever relations with the preceding
Page 39 and 40:
of neighbour, the lawyer would beli
Page 41 and 42:
the Samaritans clearly appears not
Page 43 and 44:
the kingdom breaks abruptly into on
Page 45 and 46:
2. The Friend at Midnight (11:5-8)
Page 47 and 48:
With respect to v. 8 there are thre
Page 49 and 50:
(the petitioner) The noun , there
Page 51 and 52:
although he knows that it is second
Page 53 and 54:
The rich man in the parable intends
Page 55 and 56:
the parable. V. 21 is a repetition
Page 57 and 58:
either pointing to the meaning of t
Page 59 and 60:
ear fruit (Lev 19:23), 14 whereas B
Page 61 and 62:
parable, namely the three years and
Page 63 and 64:
5. The Great Banquet (14: 15-24) 5-
Page 65 and 66:
symposia give the background for un
Page 67 and 68:
through Jesus’ ministry. Furtherm
Page 69 and 70:
ecause it is ready.’ People shoul
Page 71 and 72:
In addition to Kilgallen’s view,
Page 73 and 74:
and maintaining sociability and the
Page 75 and 76:
version in the Gospel of Truth may
Page 77 and 78:
shoulders may be commonplace from a
Page 79 and 80:
imagination and are unconvincing. I
Page 81 and 82:
6-3-1. The Analysis of the Parable
Page 83 and 84:
woman is simply compared to the ang
Page 85 and 86:
With respect to the authenticity of
Page 87 and 88:
and Scott contend that the practice
Page 89 and 90:
distance from them is not merely ge
Page 91 and 92:
20:12), as I have pointed out, the
Page 93 and 94:
iniquity, rather than seeking to fi
Page 95 and 96:
. 127 The father leaves the decisio
Page 97 and 98:
the younger son here represents the
Page 99 and 100:
giving too much to his children. 14
Page 101 and 102:
7. The Parable of the Unjust Stewar
Page 103 and 104:
simply the house. Moreover, it is m
Page 105 and 106:
kingdom of God, a new epoch has ope
Page 107 and 108:
might be an exception to the rule o
Page 109 and 110:
means to give the steward time for
Page 111 and 112:
contends Derrect, is that it is an
Page 113 and 114:
econsider and re-evaluate their und
Page 115 and 116:
prohibition of usury might have had
Page 117 and 118:
followers are strongly encouraged t
Page 119 and 120:
wealth faithfully, it is to express
Page 121 and 122:
here and now, not a revolutionary a
Page 123 and 124:
ministry. In addition, the correct
Page 125 and 126:
similarities between the Gallus and
Page 127 and 128:
Jewish story on the grounds of Deut
Page 129 and 130:
wealth. 27 At that time, this impor
Page 131 and 132:
imply that he remained unburied, 41
Page 133 and 134:
netherworld for his bad deeds which
Page 135 and 136:
of the preaching of the resurrectio
Page 137 and 138:
about religion or theology.” 74 E
Page 139 and 140:
9. The Judge and the Widow (18: 1-8
Page 141 and 142:
addition, such a formula also appea
Page 143 and 144:
The Old Testament taught the Israel
Page 145 and 146:
two court systems, for religious m
Page 147 and 148:
authoritative teacher. The adjectiv
Page 149 and 150:
however, no evidence to support his
Page 151 and 152:
interweaves the two points in the a
Page 153 and 154:
floating saying of Jesus, it comes
Page 155 and 156:
Josephus, the NT and rabbinic liter
Page 157 and 158:
they are portrayed as robbers, murd
Page 159 and 160:
collector on a par with swindlers,
Page 161 and 162:
eyes to heaven,” 59 “beating hi
Page 163 and 164:
humbles himself will be exalted”
Page 165 and 166:
subverts the expectation of the aud
Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 5 The Theological Themes of
Page 169 and 170:
Joachim Jeremais, New Testament The
Page 171 and 172:
the captives and recovering of sigh
Page 173 and 174:
preferentially opts for the poor li
Page 175 and 176:
marginalized, it is natural that he
Page 177 and 178:
Others link complete renunciation o
Page 179 and 180:
a symbolic function for possessions
Page 181 and 182:
possessions and give alms to the po
Page 183 and 184:
lessing prayer of the disciples bef
Page 185 and 186:
the Canticles, proclaims the fulfil
Page 187 and 188:
the Lord Jesus. Jesus’ prayer in
Page 189 and 190:
tells stories and composes prayers
Page 191 and 192:
4. Conversion Of the parables that
Page 193 and 194:
sources regarding conversion texts,
Page 195 and 196:
and behaviour required of people to
Page 197 and 198:
gives a promise to do fourfold rest
Page 199 and 200:
the crowd in Jerusalem and Agrippa.
Page 201 and 202:
formation. 28 Secondly, conversion
Page 203 and 204:
eligion. 37 However, Bailey fails t
Page 205 and 206:
comes to a conclusion that conversi
Page 207 and 208:
1-1. Lk 19:44 2 E.E. Ellis feels th
Page 209 and 210:
Linking 19:38a with the prefiguring
Page 211 and 212:
1-4. Lk 19:28 16 17 J. Székely agr
Page 213 and 214:
this context. It seems intended so
Page 215 and 216:
2. The Interpretational Approaches
Page 217 and 218:
main focus seems to be on reconcili
Page 219 and 220:
doing, he notes that Luke in partic
Page 221 and 222:
Luke made use of material available
Page 223 and 224:
which prevail in Hellenistic and bi
Page 225 and 226:
Jesus’ words and deeds have a fun
Page 227 and 228:
e) 11:14-36 e’) 17:11-37 Healing
Page 229 and 230:
arrangement that offer the Journey
Page 231 and 232:
truth.” 40 Rather than simply on
Page 233 and 234:
in the travel narrative Luke’s pu
Page 235 and 236:
number of cycles of the Writings (t
Page 237 and 238:
travel narrative, Luke integrates t
Page 239 and 240:
Promised Land. The Lukan exodus mot
Page 241 and 242:
3. Christological and Ecclesiologic
Page 243 and 244:
the Journey also requires total aba
Page 245 and 246:
ut also teaches that it is our task
Page 247 and 248:
eschatological crisis has arisen fr
Page 249 and 250:
the judge saying, “vindicate me a
Page 251 and 252:
presented as love and forgiveness.
Page 253 and 254:
officials would have had the compet
Page 255 and 256:
Luke’s readers would have been ab
Page 257 and 258:
the church through the activity of
Page 259 and 260:
Gentile believers who are heirs to
Page 261 and 262:
proclaiming its universal message,
Page 263 and 264:
Sterling mentions, to understand Ch
Page 265 and 266:
the new context of the Hellenistic
Page 267 and 268:
was modeled on that of Israel, and
Page 269 and 270:
defend him against the charges and
Page 271 and 272:
Stein, unlike Conzelmann’s conten
Page 273 and 274:
follows, I will explore the purpose
Page 275 and 276:
c) just as they were delivered to u
Page 277 and 278:
of Greek historiography, both in ge
Page 279 and 280:
as a neutral force for various reas
Page 281 and 282:
separate groups, since according to
Page 283 and 284:
desired impact of his works on read
Page 285 and 286:
traditional arrangement of the mate
Page 287 and 288: doctrinal correctness. 73 In any ev
Page 289 and 290: accepted because of their response
Page 291 and 292: Christians by means of this ethos o
Page 293 and 294: early Christians were divided, howe
Page 295 and 296: 2-2-2-1. Gentile Christians Many sc
Page 297 and 298: offer plausible causes concerning t
Page 299 and 300: understanding Luke’s view of the
Page 301 and 302: P. Esler feels that the primary con
Page 303 and 304: Luke seeks to reassure his readers
Page 305 and 306: Luke looks backwards on the Scriptu
Page 307 and 308: superficial and fickle in their res
Page 309 and 310: Paul’s sermons, God has raised Je
Page 311 and 312: 3. The Role of the Lukan Parables i
Page 313 and 314: instruction for the Christian life,
Page 315 and 316: oppressed, to proclaim the acceptab
Page 317 and 318: prayer, Christians must seek to kno
Page 319 and 320: Jerusalem. Jesus’ goal in Luke is
Page 321 and 322: problems, and that it is fairly har
Page 323 and 324: likely challenge the faith-life of
Page 325 and 326: Nations,” in Jesus and the Herita
Page 327 and 328: Bockmuehl, Markus, “Why not Let A
Page 329 and 330: Biblical Association of America, 19
Page 331 and 332: ——, “The Delineation of the L
Page 333 and 334: ——, “The Pharisee and the Pub
Page 335 and 336: University Press, 1980. Gerhardsson
Page 337: ——, “An Unfinished Story abou
Page 341 and 342: Lake, K. “Proselytes and God-Fear
Page 343 and 344: Matera, Frank J. “Jesus’ Journe
Page 345 and 346: Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press
Page 347 and 348: Phillips, T.E. “Reading Recent Re
Page 349 and 350: Robert H. Stein, “The Genre of th
Page 351 and 352: Sherwin-White, A. N. Rome Society a
Page 353 and 354: of the Fig-Tree Pericope in Mark’
Page 355 and 356: Warden, Duane, “The Rich Man and
Page 357 and 358: Abstract For the most part, Lukan p
Page 359 and 360: Abstrak Die Lukas-gelykenisse is al
show all

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?