the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

——, Cliffs of Fall: Paradox and Polyvalence in the Parables of Jesus. New York: Seabury, 1980.
——, In Parables: The Challenge of the Historical Jesus. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge Press, 1973.
Crossley, James G. “The Semitic Background to Repentance in the Teaching of John the Baptist and
Jesus,” JSHJ 2.2 (2004), 138-57.
Crown, A.D. The Samaritans. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck], 1989.
Crump, D.M. Jesus the Intercessor: Prayer and Christology in Luke-Acts. WUNT 2/49. Tübingen:
Mohr-Siebeck, 1992.
Culpepper, R. Alan, Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design. Philadelphia: Fortress
Press, 1983.
Curkpatrick, Stephen, “A Parable Frame-up and Its Audacious Reframing,” NTS 48 (2003), 22-38.
——, “Dissonance in Luke 18:1-8,” JBL 121 (2002), 107-121.
——, “Parable Metonymy and Luke’s Kerygmatic Framing,” JSNT 25 (2003), 289-307.
D’Sa, T. “The Salvation of the Rich in the Gospel of Luke,” Vidyajyoti 52 (1988), 170-180.
Dahl, Nils A. “The purpose of Luke-Acts,” in Jesus in the Memory of the Early Church. Minneapolis,
Minn.: Augsburg Pub. House, 1976, 87-98.
——, “The Story of Abraham in Luke-Acts,” in Studies in Luke-Acts, L.E. Keck and J.L. Martyn
(eds.). Nashville: Abingdon, 1966, 139-159.
Danby, H. The Mishnah. London: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Danker, F.W. Benefactor. Epigraphic Study of a Graeco-Roman and New Testament Semantic Field.
St Louis, Clayton Publishing House, 1982.
——, Jesus and the New Age: A Commentary on St. Luke’s Gospel. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988.
Daube, D. “Inheritance in Two Lukan Pericopes,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für
Rechtsgeschichgte 72 (1995), 326-34.
David Wenham and Steve Walton, Exploring the NT: A Guide to The Gospel and Acts, Vol. I.
Downers Grove, Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 2001.
Davids, P.H. “Poverty and Wealth,” in Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels, J.B. Green and S.
McKnight (eds.). Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity, 1992, 701-10.
Davies, J.H. “The Purpose of the Central Section of St. Luke’s Gospel,” in Studia Evangelica II. F.L.
Cross (ed.), TU, 87, Berlin, 1964, 164-69.
Davis, Patricia M., and Rambo, Lewis R. “Converting: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Religious
Change,” in Soul, Psyche, Brain: New Directions in the Study of Religion and Brain-Mind
Science, Kelly Bulkeley (ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 159-73.
Dawsey, J. “The Literary Unity of Luke-Acts: Questions of Style-A Task for Literary Critics,” NTS 35
(1989), 48-66.
Dean R. Wickes, The Sources of Luke’s Perean Section. Chicago: UCP, 1912.
DeBoer, M.C. “God Fearers in Luke-Acts,” in Luke’s Literary Achievement: Collected Essays, C.M.
Tuckett (ed.). JSNTSup, 116; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995, 50-71.
Degenhardt, H.J. Lukas Evangelist der Armen: Besitz und Besitzverzicht in den lukanischen Schriften.
Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1965.
Delling, G. “Das Gleichnis vom gottlosen Richter,” ZNW 53 (1962), 1-25.
——, “,” TDNT, VIII, 32-33.
Den Boer, W. “Some Remarks on the Beginnings of Christian Historiography,” Studia Patristica 4
(1961), 348-362.
Denaux, A. “Het lucaanse reisverhaal (Lc. 9:51-19:44),” CBG 14 (1968), 214-242; 15 (1969), 464-
501.
——, “Old Testament Models for the Lukan Travel Narrative. A Critical Survey,” in The Scriptures in
the Gospels, C.M. Tuckett (ed.). Louvain: Leuven University Press, 1997, 271-305.
321