the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

More documents

Recommendations

Info

on Luke and Acts, Earl Richard (ed.). Collegeville: MN: Liturgical Press, 1990, 78-85. ——, “The Departure for Jerusalem (Luke 9:51-56) as a Rhetorical Imitation of Elijah’s Departure for the Jordan (2 Kgs 1:1-2:6),” Bib 70 (1989), 96-109. Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. Garden City: Doubleday, 1976. Brown, S. Apostasy and Perseverance in the Theology of Luke. Rome: Pontifical Bible Institute, 1969. Bruce, A.B. The Parabolic Teaching of Christ: A Systematic and Critical Study of the Parables of Our Lord. New York: A. C. Armstrong & Son, 1886. Bruce, F.F. “Justification by Faith in the Non-Pauline Writings of the New Testament,” EvQ 24 (1952), 66-77. ——, The Acts of the Apostles: The Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary. London: The Tyndale Press, 1952. ——, The Apostolic Defence of the Gospel: Christian Apologetics in the New Testament. Lodon: Inter-Varsity Fellowship, 1959. Büchsel, F. “,” TDNT, I, 378. Buckwalter, H. Douglas, The Character and Purpose of Luke’s Christology. SNTSMS 89; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Bultmann, R. The History of the Synoptic Tradition. Oxford: Blackwell; New York: Harper & Row, 1963. Burridge, Richard A. (ed.), “About People, by People, for People: Gospel Genre and Audiences,” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audience. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998, 113-145. ——, Imitating Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007. Bussby, F. “Did a Shepherd Leave Sheep upon the Mountains or in the Desert? A Note on Matthew 18:12 and Luke 15:4,” ATR 44 (1963), 93-94. Buttrick, David, Speaking Parables: A Homiletic Guide. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2000. Byrne, B. “Forceful Stewardship and Neglected Wealth: A Contemporary Reading of Luke 16,” Pacifica 1 (1988), 1-14. Cadbury, H.J. “‘We’ and ‘I’ Passages in Luke-Acts,” NTS 3 (1956-57), 128-132. ——, “Commentary on the Preface of Luke,” The Beginnings of Christianity, Part 1. The Acts of Apostles, F.J.F. Jackson and K. Lake (eds.). Vol. II. London: MacMillan, 1922, 489-510. ——, “The Knowledge Claimed in Luke’s Preface,” ExpTim 24 (1922), 401-422. ——, “The Purpose Expressed in Luke’s Preface,” Exp 8/21 (1921), 431-441. ——, The Making of Luke-Acts. London: SPCK, 1968. ——, The Style and Literary Method of Luke. New York: Kraus Reprint, 1969. Cadoux, A.T. The Parables of Jesus: Their Art and Use. London: J. Clarke, 1930. Cadoux, C.I. “The Visits of Jesus to Jerusalem,” Exp 9/3 (1925), 175-192. Caird, G.B. The Gospel of St. Luke. London: A & C. Black, 1968. Callan, T. “The Preface of Luke-Acts and Historiography,” NTS 31 (1985), 576-581. Carey, Greg “Luke and the Rhetorics of Discipleship: The L Parables as Case Study,” in Rhetorics and Hermeneutics: Wilhelm Wuellner and His Influence, James D. Hester and J. David Hester (eds.). New York: T&T Clark International, 2004, 145-174. Carlston, C.E. “Parable and Allegory Revisited: An Interpretive Review,” CBQ 43 (1981), 228-242. ——, “Reminiscence and Redaction in Luke 15:11-32,” JBL 94 (1975), 368-390. Carroll, John T. “Luke’s Portrayal of the Pharisees,” CBQ 50 (1988), 604-621. Carter, Warren and Heil, John Paul, Matthew’s Parables, CBQMS 30. Washington, DC: The Catholic 319
Biblical Association of America, 1998. Cassidy, R.J. Jesus, Politics, and Society: A Study of Luke’s Gospel. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books, 1978. Catchpole, D.R. “Q and ‘the Friend at Midnight’ (Luke 11:5-8/9),” JTS 34 (1983), 407-424. ——, “The Son of Man’s Search for Faith (Lk 18:8b),” NovT 19 (1977), 81-104. Cave, C.H. “Lazarus and the Lukan Deuteronomy,” NTS 15 (1968-69), 319-325. Charles, R.H. The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English, with introductions and critical and explanatory notes to the several book. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1963. Charlesworth, J.H. (ed.), The Old Testament Pseudepighrapha, Vol 2, London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1985. ——, The Pseudegrapha and Modern Research with a Supplement. SCSS 7; Chico: Scholars Press, 1981. Chester, S. Conversion at Corinth. London: T & T Clark, 2003. Chilton, B.D. “Jesus and the Repentance of E.P. Sanders,” TynBul 39 (1988), 1-18. ——, “The Gospel according to Thomas as a Source of Jesus’ Teaching,” in The Jesus Tradition outside the Gospels, David Wenham (ed.). Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1985, 155-176. Cohen, H. “Bet Din and Judges,” Encyclopedia Judaica 2, 721-23. Cohen, S.J.D. “Respect for Gentiles in the Writings of Josephus,” HTR 80 (1987), 409-30. Coleridge, Mark, The Birth of the Lukan Narrative: Narratives as Christology in Luke 1-2. Sheffield: JSOT, 1993. Colson, F.H. “Notes on St. Luke’s Preface,” JTS 24 (1923), 300-309. Combrink, H.J.B. “A Social-Scientific Perspective on the parable of the ‘unjust’ steward (Lk 16:1-8a),” Neotestamentica 30 (1996), 281-306. ——, “Multiple meaning and/or multiple interpretation of a text,” Neotestamentica 18 (1984), 26-37. Conn, Walter E. “Conversion: A Developmental Perspective,” Cross Currents 32 (1982), 323-328. Conzelmann, H. The Theology of St Luke. New York: Harper & Row, 1960. Cook, E.J. “The Synoptic Indications of the Visits of Jesus to Jerusalem,” ExpTim 41 (1929/30), 121- 123. Corlett, T. “This Brother of Yours,” ExpTim 100 (1988), 216. Cortés Juan B. and Gatti, Florence M. “On the Meaning of Luke 16:16,” JBL 106 (1987), 247-259. Cortés, Juan B. “The Greek Text of Luke 18:14a: A Contribution to the Method of Reasoned Eclecticism,” CBQ 46 (1984), 255-273. Cosgrove, C.H. “The Divine ΔEI in Luke-Acts: Investigations into the Lukan Understanding of God’s Providence,” NovT 26 (1984), 168-90. Cotter, Wendy “The Parable of the Feisty Widow and the Threatened Judge (Luke 18:1-8),” NTS 51 (2005), 328-43. Cranfield, C.E.B. “The Parable of the Unjust Judge and the Eschatology of Luke-Acts,” SJT 16 (1963), 297-301. Creed, J.M. The Gospel according to St. Luke: The Greek Test with Introduction, Notes, and Indices. London: Macmillan, 1930. Crossan, J.D. ‘Structuralist Analysis and the Parables of Jesus: A Reply to D.O. Via, “Parable and Example Story: A Literary-Structuralist Approach,’” Semeia 1 (1974), 50-54. ——, “Parable and Example in the Teaching of Jesus,” NTS 18 (1972), 285-307. ——, “Parable, Allegory, and Paradox,” in Semiology and Parables: An Exploration of the Possibilities Offered by Structuralism for Exegesis, Daniel Patte (ed.). Pittsburgh: Pickwick Press, 1976, 264-277. 320
Page 1 and 2:
THE ROLE OF THE LUKAN PARABLES IN T
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgements Even though writin
Page 5 and 6:
6-3. The Parables of The Lost Coin
Page 7 and 8:
Abbreviations AB Anchor Bible ABD D
Page 9 and 10:
SVTQ Saint Vladimir’s Theological
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 Introduction 1. Research
Page 13 and 14:
the Lukan parables, examining the t
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2 A History of Research of
Page 17 and 18:
parables, the soliloquies function
Page 19 and 20:
links between the parables and thei
Page 21 and 22:
Peasant and The Oriental Versions.
Page 23 and 24:
Greg W. Forbes 59 sets out not only
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 3 A Methodological basis fo
Page 27 and 28:
those of the evangelists. “There
Page 29 and 30:
estore their power and sense of dra
Page 31 and 32:
Secondly, irrespective of how the p
Page 33 and 34:
of the framing structure and in the
Page 35 and 36:
Part II An Analysis of the Lukan Pa
Page 37 and 38:
sever relations with the preceding
Page 39 and 40:
of neighbour, the lawyer would beli
Page 41 and 42:
the Samaritans clearly appears not
Page 43 and 44:
the kingdom breaks abruptly into on
Page 45 and 46:
2. The Friend at Midnight (11:5-8)
Page 47 and 48:
With respect to v. 8 there are thre
Page 49 and 50:
(the petitioner) The noun , there
Page 51 and 52:
although he knows that it is second
Page 53 and 54:
The rich man in the parable intends
Page 55 and 56:
the parable. V. 21 is a repetition
Page 57 and 58:
either pointing to the meaning of t
Page 59 and 60:
ear fruit (Lev 19:23), 14 whereas B
Page 61 and 62:
parable, namely the three years and
Page 63 and 64:
5. The Great Banquet (14: 15-24) 5-
Page 65 and 66:
symposia give the background for un
Page 67 and 68:
through Jesus’ ministry. Furtherm
Page 69 and 70:
ecause it is ready.’ People shoul
Page 71 and 72:
In addition to Kilgallen’s view,
Page 73 and 74:
and maintaining sociability and the
Page 75 and 76:
version in the Gospel of Truth may
Page 77 and 78:
shoulders may be commonplace from a
Page 79 and 80:
imagination and are unconvincing. I
Page 81 and 82:
6-3-1. The Analysis of the Parable
Page 83 and 84:
woman is simply compared to the ang
Page 85 and 86:
With respect to the authenticity of
Page 87 and 88:
and Scott contend that the practice
Page 89 and 90:
distance from them is not merely ge
Page 91 and 92:
20:12), as I have pointed out, the
Page 93 and 94:
iniquity, rather than seeking to fi
Page 95 and 96:
. 127 The father leaves the decisio
Page 97 and 98:
the younger son here represents the
Page 99 and 100:
giving too much to his children. 14
Page 101 and 102:
7. The Parable of the Unjust Stewar
Page 103 and 104:
simply the house. Moreover, it is m
Page 105 and 106:
kingdom of God, a new epoch has ope
Page 107 and 108:
might be an exception to the rule o
Page 109 and 110:
means to give the steward time for
Page 111 and 112:
contends Derrect, is that it is an
Page 113 and 114:
econsider and re-evaluate their und
Page 115 and 116:
prohibition of usury might have had
Page 117 and 118:
followers are strongly encouraged t
Page 119 and 120:
wealth faithfully, it is to express
Page 121 and 122:
here and now, not a revolutionary a
Page 123 and 124:
ministry. In addition, the correct
Page 125 and 126:
similarities between the Gallus and
Page 127 and 128:
Jewish story on the grounds of Deut
Page 129 and 130:
wealth. 27 At that time, this impor
Page 131 and 132:
imply that he remained unburied, 41
Page 133 and 134:
netherworld for his bad deeds which
Page 135 and 136:
of the preaching of the resurrectio
Page 137 and 138:
about religion or theology.” 74 E
Page 139 and 140:
9. The Judge and the Widow (18: 1-8
Page 141 and 142:
addition, such a formula also appea
Page 143 and 144:
The Old Testament taught the Israel
Page 145 and 146:
two court systems, for religious m
Page 147 and 148:
authoritative teacher. The adjectiv
Page 149 and 150:
however, no evidence to support his
Page 151 and 152:
interweaves the two points in the a
Page 153 and 154:
floating saying of Jesus, it comes
Page 155 and 156:
Josephus, the NT and rabbinic liter
Page 157 and 158:
they are portrayed as robbers, murd
Page 159 and 160:
collector on a par with swindlers,
Page 161 and 162:
eyes to heaven,” 59 “beating hi
Page 163 and 164:
humbles himself will be exalted”
Page 165 and 166:
subverts the expectation of the aud
Page 167 and 168:
Chapter 5 The Theological Themes of
Page 169 and 170:
Joachim Jeremais, New Testament The
Page 171 and 172:
the captives and recovering of sigh
Page 173 and 174:
preferentially opts for the poor li
Page 175 and 176:
marginalized, it is natural that he
Page 177 and 178:
Others link complete renunciation o
Page 179 and 180:
a symbolic function for possessions
Page 181 and 182:
possessions and give alms to the po
Page 183 and 184:
lessing prayer of the disciples bef
Page 185 and 186:
the Canticles, proclaims the fulfil
Page 187 and 188:
the Lord Jesus. Jesus’ prayer in
Page 189 and 190:
tells stories and composes prayers
Page 191 and 192:
4. Conversion Of the parables that
Page 193 and 194:
sources regarding conversion texts,
Page 195 and 196:
and behaviour required of people to
Page 197 and 198:
gives a promise to do fourfold rest
Page 199 and 200:
the crowd in Jerusalem and Agrippa.
Page 201 and 202:
formation. 28 Secondly, conversion
Page 203 and 204:
eligion. 37 However, Bailey fails t
Page 205 and 206:
comes to a conclusion that conversi
Page 207 and 208:
1-1. Lk 19:44 2 E.E. Ellis feels th
Page 209 and 210:
Linking 19:38a with the prefiguring
Page 211 and 212:
1-4. Lk 19:28 16 17 J. Székely agr
Page 213 and 214:
this context. It seems intended so
Page 215 and 216:
2. The Interpretational Approaches
Page 217 and 218:
main focus seems to be on reconcili
Page 219 and 220:
doing, he notes that Luke in partic
Page 221 and 222:
Luke made use of material available
Page 223 and 224:
which prevail in Hellenistic and bi
Page 225 and 226:
Jesus’ words and deeds have a fun
Page 227 and 228:
e) 11:14-36 e’) 17:11-37 Healing
Page 229 and 230:
arrangement that offer the Journey
Page 231 and 232:
truth.” 40 Rather than simply on
Page 233 and 234:
in the travel narrative Luke’s pu
Page 235 and 236:
number of cycles of the Writings (t
Page 237 and 238:
travel narrative, Luke integrates t
Page 239 and 240:
Promised Land. The Lukan exodus mot
Page 241 and 242:
3. Christological and Ecclesiologic
Page 243 and 244:
the Journey also requires total aba
Page 245 and 246:
ut also teaches that it is our task
Page 247 and 248:
eschatological crisis has arisen fr
Page 249 and 250:
the judge saying, “vindicate me a
Page 251 and 252:
presented as love and forgiveness.
Page 253 and 254:
officials would have had the compet
Page 255 and 256:
Luke’s readers would have been ab
Page 257 and 258:
the church through the activity of
Page 259 and 260:
Gentile believers who are heirs to
Page 261 and 262:
proclaiming its universal message,
Page 263 and 264:
Sterling mentions, to understand Ch
Page 265 and 266:
the new context of the Hellenistic
Page 267 and 268:
was modeled on that of Israel, and
Page 269 and 270:
defend him against the charges and
Page 271 and 272:
Stein, unlike Conzelmann’s conten
Page 273 and 274:
follows, I will explore the purpose
Page 275 and 276:
c) just as they were delivered to u
Page 277 and 278: of Greek historiography, both in ge
Page 279 and 280: as a neutral force for various reas
Page 281 and 282: separate groups, since according to
Page 283 and 284: desired impact of his works on read
Page 285 and 286: traditional arrangement of the mate
Page 287 and 288: doctrinal correctness. 73 In any ev
Page 289 and 290: accepted because of their response
Page 291 and 292: Christians by means of this ethos o
Page 293 and 294: early Christians were divided, howe
Page 295 and 296: 2-2-2-1. Gentile Christians Many sc
Page 297 and 298: offer plausible causes concerning t
Page 299 and 300: understanding Luke’s view of the
Page 301 and 302: P. Esler feels that the primary con
Page 303 and 304: Luke seeks to reassure his readers
Page 305 and 306: Luke looks backwards on the Scriptu
Page 307 and 308: superficial and fickle in their res
Page 309 and 310: Paul’s sermons, God has raised Je
Page 311 and 312: 3. The Role of the Lukan Parables i
Page 313 and 314: instruction for the Christian life,
Page 315 and 316: oppressed, to proclaim the acceptab
Page 317 and 318: prayer, Christians must seek to kno
Page 319 and 320: Jerusalem. Jesus’ goal in Luke is
Page 321 and 322: problems, and that it is fairly har
Page 323 and 324: likely challenge the faith-life of
Page 325 and 326: Nations,” in Jesus and the Herita
Page 327: Bockmuehl, Markus, “Why not Let A
Page 331 and 332: ——, “The Delineation of the L
Page 333 and 334: ——, “The Pharisee and the Pub
Page 335 and 336: University Press, 1980. Gerhardsson
Page 337 and 338: ——, “An Unfinished Story abou
Page 339 and 340: Johnson, L.T. “On Finding the Luk
Page 341 and 342: Lake, K. “Proselytes and God-Fear
Page 343 and 344: Matera, Frank J. “Jesus’ Journe
Page 345 and 346: Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press
Page 347 and 348: Phillips, T.E. “Reading Recent Re
Page 349 and 350: Robert H. Stein, “The Genre of th
Page 351 and 352: Sherwin-White, A. N. Rome Society a
Page 353 and 354: of the Fig-Tree Pericope in Mark’
Page 355 and 356: Warden, Duane, “The Rich Man and
Page 357 and 358: Abstract For the most part, Lukan p
Page 359 and 360: Abstrak Die Lukas-gelykenisse is al
show all

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?