the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
on Luke and Acts, Earl Richard (ed.). Collegeville: MN: Liturgical Press, 1990, 78-85. ——, “The Departure for Jerusalem (Luke 9:51-56) as a Rhetorical Imitation of Elijah’s Departure for the Jordan (2 Kgs 1:1-2:6),” Bib 70 (1989), 96-109. Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. Garden City: Doubleday, 1976. Brown, S. Apostasy and Perseverance in the Theology of Luke. Rome: Pontifical Bible Institute, 1969. Bruce, A.B. The Parabolic Teaching of Christ: A Systematic and Critical Study of the Parables of Our Lord. New York: A. C. Armstrong & Son, 1886. Bruce, F.F. “Justification by Faith in the Non-Pauline Writings of the New Testament,” EvQ 24 (1952), 66-77. ——, The Acts of the Apostles: The Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary. London: The Tyndale Press, 1952. ——, The Apostolic Defence of the Gospel: Christian Apologetics in the New Testament. Lodon: Inter-Varsity Fellowship, 1959. Büchsel, F. “,” TDNT, I, 378. Buckwalter, H. Douglas, The Character and Purpose of Luke’s Christology. SNTSMS 89; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Bultmann, R. The History of the Synoptic Tradition. Oxford: Blackwell; New York: Harper & Row, 1963. Burridge, Richard A. (ed.), “About People, by People, for People: Gospel Genre and Audiences,” in The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking the Gospel Audience. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1998, 113-145. ——, Imitating Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007. Bussby, F. “Did a Shepherd Leave Sheep upon the Mountains or in the Desert? A Note on Matthew 18:12 and Luke 15:4,” ATR 44 (1963), 93-94. Buttrick, David, Speaking Parables: A Homiletic Guide. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2000. Byrne, B. “Forceful Stewardship and Neglected Wealth: A Contemporary Reading of Luke 16,” Pacifica 1 (1988), 1-14. Cadbury, H.J. “‘We’ and ‘I’ Passages in Luke-Acts,” NTS 3 (1956-57), 128-132. ——, “Commentary on the Preface of Luke,” The Beginnings of Christianity, Part 1. The Acts of Apostles, F.J.F. Jackson and K. Lake (eds.). Vol. II. London: MacMillan, 1922, 489-510. ——, “The Knowledge Claimed in Luke’s Preface,” ExpTim 24 (1922), 401-422. ——, “The Purpose Expressed in Luke’s Preface,” Exp 8/21 (1921), 431-441. ——, The Making of Luke-Acts. London: SPCK, 1968. ——, The Style and Literary Method of Luke. New York: Kraus Reprint, 1969. Cadoux, A.T. The Parables of Jesus: Their Art and Use. London: J. Clarke, 1930. Cadoux, C.I. “The Visits of Jesus to Jerusalem,” Exp 9/3 (1925), 175-192. Caird, G.B. The Gospel of St. Luke. London: A & C. Black, 1968. Callan, T. “The Preface of Luke-Acts and Historiography,” NTS 31 (1985), 576-581. Carey, Greg “Luke and the Rhetorics of Discipleship: The L Parables as Case Study,” in Rhetorics and Hermeneutics: Wilhelm Wuellner and His Influence, James D. Hester and J. David Hester (eds.). New York: T&T Clark International, 2004, 145-174. Carlston, C.E. “Parable and Allegory Revisited: An Interpretive Review,” CBQ 43 (1981), 228-242. ——, “Reminiscence and Redaction in Luke 15:11-32,” JBL 94 (1975), 368-390. Carroll, John T. “Luke’s Portrayal of the Pharisees,” CBQ 50 (1988), 604-621. Carter, Warren and Heil, John Paul, Matthew’s Parables, CBQMS 30. Washington, DC: The Catholic 319
Biblical Association of America, 1998. Cassidy, R.J. Jesus, Politics, and Society: A Study of Luke’s Gospel. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books, 1978. Catchpole, D.R. “Q and ‘the Friend at Midnight’ (Luke 11:5-8/9),” JTS 34 (1983), 407-424. ——, “The Son of Man’s Search for Faith (Lk 18:8b),” NovT 19 (1977), 81-104. Cave, C.H. “Lazarus and the Lukan Deuteronomy,” NTS 15 (1968-69), 319-325. Charles, R.H. The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament in English, with introductions and critical and explanatory notes to the several book. London: Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1963. Charlesworth, J.H. (ed.), The Old Testament Pseudepighrapha, Vol 2, London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1985. ——, The Pseudegrapha and Modern Research with a Supplement. SCSS 7; Chico: Scholars Press, 1981. Chester, S. Conversion at Corinth. London: T & T Clark, 2003. Chilton, B.D. “Jesus and the Repentance of E.P. Sanders,” TynBul 39 (1988), 1-18. ——, “The Gospel according to Thomas as a Source of Jesus’ Teaching,” in The Jesus Tradition outside the Gospels, David Wenham (ed.). Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1985, 155-176. Cohen, H. “Bet Din and Judges,” Encyclopedia Judaica 2, 721-23. Cohen, S.J.D. “Respect for Gentiles in the Writings of Josephus,” HTR 80 (1987), 409-30. Coleridge, Mark, The Birth of the Lukan Narrative: Narratives as Christology in Luke 1-2. Sheffield: JSOT, 1993. Colson, F.H. “Notes on St. Luke’s Preface,” JTS 24 (1923), 300-309. Combrink, H.J.B. “A Social-Scientific Perspective on the parable of the ‘unjust’ steward (Lk 16:1-8a),” Neotestamentica 30 (1996), 281-306. ——, “Multiple meaning and/or multiple interpretation of a text,” Neotestamentica 18 (1984), 26-37. Conn, Walter E. “Conversion: A Developmental Perspective,” Cross Currents 32 (1982), 323-328. Conzelmann, H. The Theology of St Luke. New York: Harper & Row, 1960. Cook, E.J. “The Synoptic Indications of the Visits of Jesus to Jerusalem,” ExpTim 41 (1929/30), 121- 123. Corlett, T. “This Brother of Yours,” ExpTim 100 (1988), 216. Cortés Juan B. and Gatti, Florence M. “On the Meaning of Luke 16:16,” JBL 106 (1987), 247-259. Cortés, Juan B. “The Greek Text of Luke 18:14a: A Contribution to the Method of Reasoned Eclecticism,” CBQ 46 (1984), 255-273. Cosgrove, C.H. “The Divine ΔEI in Luke-Acts: Investigations into the Lukan Understanding of God’s Providence,” NovT 26 (1984), 168-90. Cotter, Wendy “The Parable of the Feisty Widow and the Threatened Judge (Luke 18:1-8),” NTS 51 (2005), 328-43. Cranfield, C.E.B. “The Parable of the Unjust Judge and the Eschatology of Luke-Acts,” SJT 16 (1963), 297-301. Creed, J.M. The Gospel according to St. Luke: The Greek Test with Introduction, Notes, and Indices. London: Macmillan, 1930. Crossan, J.D. ‘Structuralist Analysis and the Parables of Jesus: A Reply to D.O. Via, “Parable and Example Story: A Literary-Structuralist Approach,’” Semeia 1 (1974), 50-54. ——, “Parable and Example in the Teaching of Jesus,” NTS 18 (1972), 285-307. ——, “Parable, Allegory, and Paradox,” in Semiology and Parables: An Exploration of the Possibilities Offered by Structuralism for Exegesis, Daniel Patte (ed.). Pittsburgh: Pickwick Press, 1976, 264-277. 320
- Page 277 and 278: of Greek historiography, both in ge
- Page 279 and 280: as a neutral force for various reas
- Page 281 and 282: separate groups, since according to
- Page 283 and 284: desired impact of his works on read
- Page 285 and 286: traditional arrangement of the mate
- Page 287 and 288: doctrinal correctness. 73 In any ev
- Page 289 and 290: accepted because of their response
- Page 291 and 292: Christians by means of this ethos o
- Page 293 and 294: early Christians were divided, howe
- Page 295 and 296: 2-2-2-1. Gentile Christians Many sc
- Page 297 and 298: offer plausible causes concerning t
- Page 299 and 300: understanding Luke’s view of the
- Page 301 and 302: P. Esler feels that the primary con
- Page 303 and 304: Luke seeks to reassure his readers
- Page 305 and 306: Luke looks backwards on the Scriptu
- Page 307 and 308: superficial and fickle in their res
- Page 309 and 310: Paul’s sermons, God has raised Je
- Page 311 and 312: 3. The Role of the Lukan Parables i
- Page 313 and 314: instruction for the Christian life,
- Page 315 and 316: oppressed, to proclaim the acceptab
- Page 317 and 318: prayer, Christians must seek to kno
- Page 319 and 320: Jerusalem. Jesus’ goal in Luke is
- Page 321 and 322: problems, and that it is fairly har
- Page 323 and 324: likely challenge the faith-life of
- Page 325 and 326: Nations,” in Jesus and the Herita
- Page 327: Bockmuehl, Markus, “Why not Let A
- Page 331 and 332: ——, “The Delineation of the L
- Page 333 and 334: ——, “The Pharisee and the Pub
- Page 335 and 336: University Press, 1980. Gerhardsson
- Page 337 and 338: ——, “An Unfinished Story abou
- Page 339 and 340: Johnson, L.T. “On Finding the Luk
- Page 341 and 342: Lake, K. “Proselytes and God-Fear
- Page 343 and 344: Matera, Frank J. “Jesus’ Journe
- Page 345 and 346: Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press
- Page 347 and 348: Phillips, T.E. “Reading Recent Re
- Page 349 and 350: Robert H. Stein, “The Genre of th
- Page 351 and 352: Sherwin-White, A. N. Rome Society a
- Page 353 and 354: of the Fig-Tree Pericope in Mark’
- Page 355 and 356: Warden, Duane, “The Rich Man and
- Page 357 and 358: Abstract For the most part, Lukan p
- Page 359 and 360: Abstrak Die Lukas-gelykenisse is al
on Luke and Acts, Earl Richard (ed.). Collegeville: MN: Liturgical Press, 1990, 78-85.<br />
——, “The Departure for Jerusalem (Luke 9:51-56) as a Rhetorical Imitation <strong>of</strong> Elijah’s Departure for<br />
<strong>the</strong> Jordan (2 Kgs 1:1-2:6),” Bib 70 (1989), 96-109.<br />
Brown, Raymond E. The Birth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Messiah: A Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Infancy Narratives <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />
and Luke. Garden City: Doubleday, 1976.<br />
Brown, S. Apostasy and Perseverance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Theology <strong>of</strong> Luke. Rome: Pontifical Bible Institute, 1969.<br />
Bruce, A.B. The Parabolic Teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Christ: A Systematic and Critical Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables <strong>of</strong> Our<br />
Lord. New York: A. C. Armstrong & Son, 1886.<br />
Bruce, F.F. “Justification by Faith <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Non-Paul<strong>in</strong>e Writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament,” EvQ 24 (1952),<br />
66-77.<br />
——, The Acts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostles: The Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary. London: The<br />
Tyndale Press, 1952.<br />
——, The Apostolic Defence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel: Christian Apologetics <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament. Lodon:<br />
Inter-Varsity Fellowship, 1959.<br />
Büchsel, F. “,” TDNT, I, 378.<br />
Buckwalter, H. Douglas, The Character and Purpose <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Christology. SNTSMS 89; Cambridge:<br />
Cambridge University Press, 1996.<br />
Bultmann, R. The History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptic Tradition. Oxford: Blackwell; New York: Harper & Row,<br />
1963.<br />
Burridge, Richard A. (ed.), “About People, by People, for People: Gospel Genre and Audiences,” <strong>in</strong><br />
The Gospels for All Christians: Reth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Gospel Audience. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans,<br />
1998, 113-145.<br />
——, Imitat<strong>in</strong>g Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,<br />
2007.<br />
Bussby, F. “Did a Shepherd Leave Sheep upon <strong>the</strong> Mounta<strong>in</strong>s or <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Desert? A Note on Mat<strong>the</strong>w<br />
18:12 and Luke 15:4,” ATR 44 (1963), 93-94.<br />
Buttrick, David, Speak<strong>in</strong>g Parables: A Homiletic Guide. Louisville: Westm<strong>in</strong>ster John Knox, 2000.<br />
Byrne, B. “Forceful Stewardship and Neglected Wealth: A Contemporary Read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Luke 16,”<br />
Pacifica 1 (1988), 1-14.<br />
Cadbury, H.J. “‘We’ and ‘I’ Passages <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts,” NTS 3 (1956-57), 128-132.<br />
——, “Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Preface <strong>of</strong> Luke,” The Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Christianity, Part 1. The Acts <strong>of</strong><br />
Apostles, F.J.F. Jackson and K. Lake (eds.). Vol. II. London: MacMillan, 1922, 489-510.<br />
——, “The Knowledge Claimed <strong>in</strong> Luke’s Preface,” ExpTim 24 (1922), 401-422.<br />
——, “The Purpose Expressed <strong>in</strong> Luke’s Preface,” Exp 8/21 (1921), 431-441.<br />
——, The Mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Luke-Acts. London: SPCK, 1968.<br />
——, The Style and Literary Method <strong>of</strong> Luke. New York: Kraus Repr<strong>in</strong>t, 1969.<br />
Cadoux, A.T. The Parables <strong>of</strong> Jesus: Their Art and Use. London: J. Clarke, 1930.<br />
Cadoux, C.I. “The Visits <strong>of</strong> Jesus to Jerusalem,” Exp 9/3 (1925), 175-192.<br />
Caird, G.B. The Gospel <strong>of</strong> St. Luke. London: A & C. Black, 1968.<br />
Callan, T. “The Preface <strong>of</strong> Luke-Acts and Historiography,” NTS 31 (1985), 576-581.<br />
Carey, Greg “Luke and <strong>the</strong> Rhetorics <strong>of</strong> Discipleship: The L Parables as Case Study,” <strong>in</strong> Rhetorics and<br />
Hermeneutics: Wilhelm Wuellner and His Influence, James D. Hester and J. David Hester (eds.).<br />
New York: T&T Clark International, 2004, 145-174.<br />
Carlston, C.E. “Parable and Allegory Revisited: An Interpretive Review,” CBQ 43 (1981), 228-242.<br />
——, “Rem<strong>in</strong>iscence and Redaction <strong>in</strong> Luke 15:11-32,” JBL 94 (1975), 368-390.<br />
Carroll, John T. “Luke’s Portrayal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pharisees,” CBQ 50 (1988), 604-621.<br />
Carter, Warren and Heil, John Paul, Mat<strong>the</strong>w’s Parables, CBQMS 30. Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: The Catholic<br />
319