the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
05.06.2013 Views

images of Judaism are in consonance with the assumed attitudes of a God-fearer as he is first addressed,” whereas “negative images which show the inferiority of Judaism to Christianity and help to explain Jewish rejection of the Christian message, urge the God-fearer to abandon the philo-Judaism with which he began.” 132 In conclusion, the purpose of Luke-Acts is to persuade God-fearers to embrace Christianity instead of Judaism. Christianity is shown to be the fulfillment of the Hebrew Scriptures and Jewish hopes and expectations which the Jews hold and yearn for. 133 In conclusion, while it is difficult to pinpoint with exact precision Luke’s intended audience, it may be that Luke’s aim was to reach a wide range of audience in the Greek- speaking world. Even though it is more plausible to view Luke’s intended readership as being “primarily” Gentile, it seems safe to say that Luke’s intended audience is a mixed audience of both Jews and Gentiles. Along this line, Wenham also argues for a wider readership, namely “diaspora Jews who frequently used the Septuagint in their worship, rather than the Hebrew Scriptures, and Gentile Christians with no synagogue background, but who had become familiar with the Septuagint through it being read in Christian worship.” 134 Even F. Bovon argues that Luke has in mind three target groups: educated Gentiles, Hellenistic Jews, and Christians unsettled by rumors, expecting “his rich friend to circulate his two volumes to a broader readership.” 135 2-3. The Plan of God in Luke-Acts Luke writes to provide his readers with reassurance of the gospel which has already been preached and taught to them, especially under the detailed discussion of God’s plan. Therefore, I will examine the role of the Lukan parables in God’s redemptive purpose, since 132. Ibid., 38. 133. Tyson, Images of Judaism in Luke-Acts, 182; M.C. deBoer, “God Fearers in Luke-Acts,” 68. Except for the scholars mentioned above, for defenders of God-fearers as Luke’s audience, see W.A. Meeks, The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul (New Haven: Yale, 1983); Juel, Luke-Acts: The Promise of History, 120. 134. David Wenham and Steve Walton, Exploring the NT: A Guide to The Gospel and Acts, Vol. I (Downers Grove, Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 2001), 294. See also Mary A. Moscato, “Current Theories Reading the Audience of Luke-Acts,” CurTM 3 (1976), 355-361, here 361; J.C. O’Neill, The Theology of Acts in its Historical Setting (London: SPCK, 1961), 173-77; J.D. Kingsbury, Jesus Christ in Matthew, Mark and Luke (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1981), 95-96; H. Riley, Preface to Luke (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1993), 9. 135. F. Bovon, Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1-9:50, Hermeneia-A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible, (trans. Christine M. Thomas: Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2002), 9. 293

Luke seeks to reassure his readers of the gospel through a pattern of God’s plan of salvation. Luke deals with this theme more than the other Synoptic evangelists. As far as his usage is concerned, the term appears once in Luke and five times in Acts. The plan of God, , in the Gospel is connected with accepting the baptism of John (Luke 7:29), thereby justifying God (, Luke 7:30). In Acts the term appears in 2:23 (), 4:28 (), 5:38 (), 13:36 (), and 20:27 (). Along with the term, other indications of God’s plan can be found throughout Luke-Acts. That is to say, it is to be noted that references to God’s design are also seen in Luke 10:21 (), 22:42 (, Acts 21:14 (), and 22:14 (). Moreover, the plan of God frequently occurs not only in the term “it is necessary” (), 136 and “it is about to” (), 137 but also in presenting that takes the early church as fulfillment according to the scriptures (and ) 138 and a cluster of -compounds and related verbs 139 which present the design of God and the execution of the plan of God. We can also add here the epiphanies which manifest God, or divine messengers. 140 All these terms are used interchangeably to refer to the same concept. Accordingly, Luke’s project is not to simply write the story of Jesus and the early church, but that of the continuation and fulfillment of 136. The term is used 18 times in Luke and 24 times in Acts. Of the 42 times the following are noted: Luke 2:29; 4:43; 9:22; 13:33; 17:25; 21:9; 22:37; 24:7, 26, 44 and Acts 1:6, 21; 3:21; 4:12; 5:29; 9:6, 16; 14:22; 16:30; 17:3; 19:21; 20:35; 23:11; 24:19; 25:10; 26:9; 27:24. For more on the term, see C.H. Cosgrove, “The Divine ΔEI in Luke-Acts: Investigations into the Lukan Understanding of God’s Providence,” NovT 26 (1984), 168-90, concludes that the divine indicates four aspects: “First, this divine points back to God’s ancient plan (the ) and so grounds the kerygmatic history in divine sanction. Second, the divine is a summons to obedience. The incentive for such faithfulness is found in the third aspect of the divine : God’s guarantee of his plan. Fourth, the logic of the divine in Luke-Acts involves a dramatic-comedic understanding of salvation-history as a stage set time and again for divine intervention, so that the spotlight of history continuously turns on God’s saving miracle.” 137. Luke 9:31, 44; 22:23; 24:21 and Acts 17:31; 26:22, 23. 138. Luke 4:21; 9:31; 21:24; 22:16; 24:44 and Acts 1:16; 2:28; 3:18; 12:25; 13:25, 27, 52; 14:26; 19:21. Luke 12:50; 18:31; 22:37. See also David Peterson, “The Motif of Fulfilment and the Purpose of Luke- Acts,” in ed., B.W. Winter and A.D. Clarke, The Book of Acts in Its Ancient Literary Setting (Grand Rapids, Mich.: The Paternoster Press, 1993), 83-104, prefers edification for a Christian audience to a direct apology for unbelievers as the purpose of Luke-Acts. 139. (Acts 4:28); (Acts 3:18; 7:52); (Acts 2:23); (Acts 3:20; 22:14; 26:16); (Acts 10:41); (Luke 22:22; Acts 2:23; 10:42; 17:26, 31); (Acts 13:48; 22:10); (Acts 1:7; 13:47, 48; 19:21; 20:28). 140. Luke 1:11-22, 26-38; 2:9-15; 3:22; 9:30-32; 22:43; 24:4-7, 15-31, 36-49 and Acts 1:3, 9-11; 2:3; 5:19-20; 9:3-6; 10:3-7, 10-16, 30-32; 11:5-10, 13-14; 12:7-11:23; 16:9-10; 18:9; 22:6-8, 17-21; 23:11; 26:13-18; 27:23- 24. 294

images <strong>of</strong> Judaism are <strong>in</strong> consonance with <strong>the</strong> assumed attitudes <strong>of</strong> a God-fearer as he is first<br />

addressed,” whereas “negative images which show <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>feriority <strong>of</strong> Judaism to Christianity<br />

and help to expla<strong>in</strong> Jewish rejection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian message, urge <strong>the</strong> God-fearer to abandon<br />

<strong>the</strong> philo-Judaism with which he began.” 132 In conclusion, <strong>the</strong> <strong>purpose</strong> <strong>of</strong> Luke-Acts is to<br />

persuade God-fearers to embrace Christianity <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> Judaism. Christianity is shown to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> fulfillment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hebrew Scriptures and Jewish hopes and expectations which <strong>the</strong> Jews<br />

hold and yearn for. 133<br />

In conclusion, while it is difficult to p<strong>in</strong>po<strong>in</strong>t with exact precision Luke’s <strong>in</strong>tended<br />

audience, it may be that Luke’s aim was to reach a wide range <strong>of</strong> audience <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Greek-<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g world. Even though it is more plausible to view Luke’s <strong>in</strong>tended readership as be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

“primarily” Gentile, it seems safe to say that Luke’s <strong>in</strong>tended audience is a mixed audience <strong>of</strong><br />

both Jews and Gentiles. Along this l<strong>in</strong>e, Wenham also argues for a wider readership, namely<br />

“diaspora Jews who frequently used <strong>the</strong> Septuag<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir worship, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> Hebrew<br />

Scriptures, and Gentile Christians with no synagogue background, but who had become<br />

familiar with <strong>the</strong> Septuag<strong>in</strong>t through it be<strong>in</strong>g read <strong>in</strong> Christian worship.” 134 Even F. Bovon<br />

argues that Luke has <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d three target groups: educated Gentiles, Hellenistic Jews, and<br />

Christians unsettled by rumors, expect<strong>in</strong>g “his rich friend to circulate his two volumes to a<br />

broader readership.” 135<br />

2-3. The Plan <strong>of</strong> God <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts<br />

Luke writes to provide his readers with reassurance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>gospel</strong> which has already been<br />

preached and taught to <strong>the</strong>m, especially under <strong>the</strong> detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> God’s plan.<br />

Therefore, I will exam<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong> <strong>in</strong> God’s redemptive <strong>purpose</strong>, s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

132. Ibid., 38.<br />

133. Tyson, Images <strong>of</strong> Judaism <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts, 182; M.C. deBoer, “God Fearers <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts,” 68. Except for <strong>the</strong><br />

scholars mentioned above, for defenders <strong>of</strong> God-fearers as Luke’s audience, see W.A. Meeks, The First Urban<br />

Christians: The Social World <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostle Paul (New Haven: Yale, 1983); Juel, Luke-Acts: The Promise <strong>of</strong><br />

History, 120.<br />

134. David Wenham and Steve Walton, Explor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> NT: A Guide to The Gospel and Acts, Vol. I (Downers<br />

Grove, Ill<strong>in</strong>ois: Intervarsity Press, 2001), 294. See also Mary A. Moscato, “Current Theories Read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Audience <strong>of</strong> Luke-Acts,” CurTM 3 (1976), 355-361, here 361; J.C. O’Neill, The Theology <strong>of</strong> Acts <strong>in</strong> its<br />

Historical Sett<strong>in</strong>g (London: SPCK, 1961), 173-77; J.D. K<strong>in</strong>gsbury, Jesus Christ <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w, Mark and Luke<br />

(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1981), 95-96; H. Riley, Preface to Luke (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press,<br />

1993), 9.<br />

135. F. Bovon, Luke 1: A Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke 1:1-9:50, Hermeneia-A Critical and Historical<br />

Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Bible, (trans. Christ<strong>in</strong>e M. Thomas: M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Fortress Press, 2002), 9.<br />

293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!