the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
(those fearing God, the fearers of God, the God-fearers) in Acts 10:2, 22; 13:16, 26 and , ( those worshipping, the worshippers, the devout ones) in Acts 13:43, 50; 16:14 17:4, 17. The expression as a technical or formal designation for a special group of persons indicates Gentiles who feared the God of Israel and attended synagogue on the Sabbath, as well as gave alms and prayed to the God of Israel, but who stopped short of becoming proselytes to Judaism (including circumcision and observance of the Law). 126 J. Nolland argues that the intended reader of Luke would be a God-fearer as a Gentile by birth who is drawn into the group on the verges of the synagogue, and who is attracted to the Jewish belief in one true God. A God-fearer would have experienced the ambiguity of his position in terms of Judaism, that is to say, in the case of the crucial divide, they still were reckoned as outside the promises of God. On the other hand, for a God-fearer, Christianity which can fully “embrace him in his Gentile identity” is viewed as “the completion and fulfillment of the Judaism.” Furthermore, a God-fearer in Luke-Acts would have been no stranger to the Christian gospel, since he would have touched the gospel through “an 127 evangelistic itineration like those attributed to Paul in Acts.” Fearers in Acts: A Reconsideration,” JSNT 13 (1981), 102-22; A.T. Kraabel, “The Disappearance of the ‘God- Fearers,’” Numen 28 (1981), 113-26; idem, “The God-Fearers Meet the Beloved Disciple,” in ed., B.A. Pearson, The Future of Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Helmut Koester (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991), 276- 284; T.M. Finn, “The God-Fearers Reconsidered,” CBQ 47 (1985), 75-84; J.J. Gager, “Jews, Gentiles, and Synagogues in the Book of Acts,” HTR 79 (1986), 91-99; F. Millar, “Gentiles and Judaism: God-Fearers and Proselytes,” by E. Schürer; revised and edited by G. Vermes, F. Millar and M. Goodman, The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, III. 1 (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1986), 150-76; Esler, Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations of Lucan Theology, 24-33; J.A. Overman, “The God-Fearers: Some Neglected Features,” JSNT 32 (1988), 17-26; J. Jervell, “The Church of Jews and Godfearers,” in ed., J.B. Tyson, Luke-Acts and the Jewish People: Eight Critical Perspectives (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1988), 11-20; Nolland, Luke, p. xxxii; J.T. Sanders, “Who is a Jew and who is a Gentile in the Book of Acts?” NTS 37 (1991), 434-55; J.B. Tyson, Images of Judaism in Luke-Acts; idem, “Jews and Judaism in Luke-Acts: Reading as a Godfearer,” NTS 41 (1995), 19-38; R. Gagnon, “Luke’s Motives for Redaction in the Account of the Double Delegation in Luke 7:1-10,” NovT 36 (1994), 122-45; M.C. deBoer, “God Fearers in Luke-Acts,” in ed., C.M. Tuckett, Luke’s Literary Achievement: Collected Essays (JSNTSup 116; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995), 50-71; J.M. Lieu, “The Race of the God-Fearers,” JTS 46 (1995), 483-501; Gary Gilbert, “The disappearance of the Gentiles: God-fearers and the image of the Jews in Luke-Acts,” Putting body & soul together (1997), 172-84; D.A. Koch, “The God-Fearers between Facts and Fiction: Two Theosebeis-Inscriptions from Aphrodisias and Their Bearing for the New Testament,” Studia Theologica, 60 (2006), 62-90. 126. P.R. Trebilco, Jewish Communities in Asia Minor (SNTSMS 69; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 150, 248 n. 24. See also, K.G. Kuhn, “,” TDNT, VI, 727-44; S.J.D. Cohen, “Respect for Gentiles in the Writings of Josephus,” HTR 80 (1987), 409-30, here 30; J. Lieu, “Circumcision, Women and Salvation,” NTS 40 (1994), 358-70, here 364-67. 127. Nolland, Luke, p. xxxii. 291
P. Esler feels that the primary concern of Luke-Acts is to legitimize relations between Jewish and Gentile Christians in Luke’s community, in which the Gentile Christians are composed mainly of God-fearers who were associated with a synagogue. The Cornelius story in Acts 10:1-48 is pivotal for Esler, since the episode shows “essential prerequisites for the conversion of Gentiles to Christianity.” This “little-noticed but highly important fact” manifests in Peter’s statement in Acts 10:34-35 that “in very nation () the person who fears God and does righteousness is acceptable to him,” 128 that is, “And Peter opened his mouth and said: Truly I perceive that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears him and does what is right is acceptable to him” (Acts 10:34-35). In a similar vein, J. Jervell also contends that Luke did not try to welcome or to convert Gentiles who have no knowledge of the Torah to Christianity, but only God-fearing Gentiles. Along this line, Paul’s mission to the Gentiles () becomes, as a matter of fact, a mission to God-fearers, in line with the Cornelius episode, with its conclusion in Acts 11:18, “When they heard this they were silenced. And they glorified God, saying, ‘Then to the Gentiles also God has granted repentance unto life’” (Acts 11:18). As a result, Luke’s community is composed of Jews and God-fearers who believed in Jesus, and not of pagan Gentiles. 129 However, having examined materials relevant to this theme, J.T. Sanders concludes that there is no evidence supporting that the readers of Luke-Acts would have understood the term as a reference to Godfearers. In his view, the term in Luke 21:24-25 and 24:47 does not favour the understanding as ‘God-fearers’, as in Acts, and the term in Acts 9:15, 21:21 and 22:21 must be understood as Gentiles as such, not as God-fearing Gentiles. 130 On the other hand, with a literary approach, Tyson holds that a literate Gentile God-fearer familiar with Jewish literature and practices is suitable for the implied reader of Luke-Acts. He enumerates seven points concerning the implied reader’s knowledge: well-educated person, being familiar with some public figures, knowing only the Greek language, having knowledge about public affairs, having an acquaintance of common Greek and Roman measurements and coinage, having a limited knowledge of both pagan and Jewish religions 131 and being familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures in their Greek translation. Luke-Acts may now be approached as an evangelistic text which is addressed to God-fearers: “Positive 128. Esler, Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations of Lucan Theology, 36- 45. 129. Jervell, “The Church of Jews and Godfearers,” 11-20. 130. Sanders, “Who is a Jew and who is a Gentile in the Book of Acts?” 434-55, especially 450. 131. Tyson, “Jews and Judaism in Luke-Acts: Reading as a Godfearer,” 24-25. 292
- Page 249 and 250: the judge saying, “vindicate me a
- Page 251 and 252: presented as love and forgiveness.
- Page 253 and 254: officials would have had the compet
- Page 255 and 256: Luke’s readers would have been ab
- Page 257 and 258: the church through the activity of
- Page 259 and 260: Gentile believers who are heirs to
- Page 261 and 262: proclaiming its universal message,
- Page 263 and 264: Sterling mentions, to understand Ch
- Page 265 and 266: the new context of the Hellenistic
- Page 267 and 268: was modeled on that of Israel, and
- Page 269 and 270: defend him against the charges and
- Page 271 and 272: Stein, unlike Conzelmann’s conten
- Page 273 and 274: follows, I will explore the purpose
- Page 275 and 276: c) just as they were delivered to u
- Page 277 and 278: of Greek historiography, both in ge
- Page 279 and 280: as a neutral force for various reas
- Page 281 and 282: separate groups, since according to
- Page 283 and 284: desired impact of his works on read
- Page 285 and 286: traditional arrangement of the mate
- Page 287 and 288: doctrinal correctness. 73 In any ev
- Page 289 and 290: accepted because of their response
- Page 291 and 292: Christians by means of this ethos o
- Page 293 and 294: early Christians were divided, howe
- Page 295 and 296: 2-2-2-1. Gentile Christians Many sc
- Page 297 and 298: offer plausible causes concerning t
- Page 299: understanding Luke’s view of the
- Page 303 and 304: Luke seeks to reassure his readers
- Page 305 and 306: Luke looks backwards on the Scriptu
- Page 307 and 308: superficial and fickle in their res
- Page 309 and 310: Paul’s sermons, God has raised Je
- Page 311 and 312: 3. The Role of the Lukan Parables i
- Page 313 and 314: instruction for the Christian life,
- Page 315 and 316: oppressed, to proclaim the acceptab
- Page 317 and 318: prayer, Christians must seek to kno
- Page 319 and 320: Jerusalem. Jesus’ goal in Luke is
- Page 321 and 322: problems, and that it is fairly har
- Page 323 and 324: likely challenge the faith-life of
- Page 325 and 326: Nations,” in Jesus and the Herita
- Page 327 and 328: Bockmuehl, Markus, “Why not Let A
- Page 329 and 330: Biblical Association of America, 19
- Page 331 and 332: ——, “The Delineation of the L
- Page 333 and 334: ——, “The Pharisee and the Pub
- Page 335 and 336: University Press, 1980. Gerhardsson
- Page 337 and 338: ——, “An Unfinished Story abou
- Page 339 and 340: Johnson, L.T. “On Finding the Luk
- Page 341 and 342: Lake, K. “Proselytes and God-Fear
- Page 343 and 344: Matera, Frank J. “Jesus’ Journe
- Page 345 and 346: Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press
- Page 347 and 348: Phillips, T.E. “Reading Recent Re
- Page 349 and 350: Robert H. Stein, “The Genre of th
(those fear<strong>in</strong>g God, <strong>the</strong> fearers <strong>of</strong> God, <strong>the</strong> God-fearers) <strong>in</strong> Acts<br />
10:2, 22; 13:16, 26 and , ( those worshipp<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> worshippers, <strong>the</strong><br />
devout ones) <strong>in</strong> Acts 13:43, 50; 16:14 17:4, 17. The expression as a<br />
technical or formal designation for a special group <strong>of</strong> persons <strong>in</strong>dicates Gentiles who feared<br />
<strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> Israel and attended synagogue on <strong>the</strong> Sabbath, as well as gave alms and prayed to<br />
<strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> Israel, but who stopped short <strong>of</strong> becom<strong>in</strong>g proselytes to Judaism (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
circumcision and observance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Law). 126<br />
J. Nolland argues that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tended reader <strong>of</strong> Luke would be a God-fearer as a Gentile by<br />
birth who is drawn <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> group on <strong>the</strong> verges <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> synagogue, and who is attracted to <strong>the</strong><br />
Jewish belief <strong>in</strong> one true God. A God-fearer would have experienced <strong>the</strong> ambiguity <strong>of</strong> his<br />
position <strong>in</strong> <strong>terms</strong> <strong>of</strong> Judaism, that is to say, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crucial divide, <strong>the</strong>y still were<br />
reckoned as outside <strong>the</strong> promises <strong>of</strong> God. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, for a God-fearer, Christianity<br />
which can fully “embrace him <strong>in</strong> his Gentile identity” is viewed as “<strong>the</strong> completion and<br />
fulfillment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Judaism.” Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, a God-fearer <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts would have been no<br />
stranger to <strong>the</strong> Christian <strong>gospel</strong>, s<strong>in</strong>ce he would have touched <strong>the</strong> <strong>gospel</strong> through “an<br />
127<br />
evangelistic it<strong>in</strong>eration like those attributed to Paul <strong>in</strong> Acts.”<br />
Fearers <strong>in</strong> Acts: A Reconsideration,” JSNT 13 (1981), 102-22; A.T. Kraabel, “The Disappearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘God-<br />
Fearers,’” Numen 28 (1981), 113-26; idem, “The God-Fearers Meet <strong>the</strong> Beloved Disciple,” <strong>in</strong> ed., B.A. Pearson,<br />
The Future <strong>of</strong> Early Christianity: Essays <strong>in</strong> Honor <strong>of</strong> Helmut Koester (M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Fortress Press, 1991), 276-<br />
284; T.M. F<strong>in</strong>n, “The God-Fearers Reconsidered,” CBQ 47 (1985), 75-84; J.J. Gager, “Jews, Gentiles, and<br />
Synagogues <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Acts,” HTR 79 (1986), 91-99; F. Millar, “Gentiles and Judaism: God-Fearers and<br />
Proselytes,” by E. Schürer; revised and edited by G. Vermes, F. Millar and M. Goodman, The History <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Jewish People <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Age <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ, III. 1 (Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh: T. & T. Clark, 1986), 150-76; Esler, Community<br />
and Gospel <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations <strong>of</strong> Lucan Theology, 24-33; J.A. Overman, “The<br />
God-Fearers: Some Neglected Features,” JSNT 32 (1988), 17-26; J. Jervell, “The Church <strong>of</strong> Jews and<br />
Godfearers,” <strong>in</strong> ed., J.B. Tyson, Luke-Acts and <strong>the</strong> Jewish People: Eight Critical Perspectives (M<strong>in</strong>neapolis:<br />
Fortress Press, 1988), 11-20; Nolland, Luke, p. xxxii; J.T. Sanders, “Who is a Jew and who is a Gentile <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Book <strong>of</strong> Acts?” NTS 37 (1991), 434-55; J.B. Tyson, Images <strong>of</strong> Judaism <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts; idem, “Jews and Judaism<br />
<strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts: Read<strong>in</strong>g as a Godfearer,” NTS 41 (1995), 19-38; R. Gagnon, “Luke’s Motives for Redaction <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Double Delegation <strong>in</strong> Luke 7:1-10,” NovT 36 (1994), 122-45; M.C. deBoer, “God Fearers <strong>in</strong><br />
Luke-Acts,” <strong>in</strong> ed., C.M. Tuckett, Luke’s Literary Achievement: Collected Essays (JSNTSup 116; Sheffield:<br />
Sheffield Academic Press, 1995), 50-71; J.M. Lieu, “The Race <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> God-Fearers,” JTS 46 (1995), 483-501;<br />
Gary Gilbert, “The disappearance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gentiles: God-fearers and <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jews <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts,” Putt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
body & soul toge<strong>the</strong>r (1997), 172-84; D.A. Koch, “The God-Fearers between Facts and Fiction: Two<br />
Theosebeis-Inscriptions from Aphrodisias and Their Bear<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> New Testament,” Studia Theologica, 60<br />
(2006), 62-90.<br />
126. P.R. Trebilco, Jewish Communities <strong>in</strong> Asia M<strong>in</strong>or (SNTSMS 69; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,<br />
1991), 150, 248 n. 24. See also, K.G. Kuhn, “,” TDNT, VI, 727-44; S.J.D. Cohen, “Respect for<br />
Gentiles <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Josephus,” HTR 80 (1987), 409-30, here 30; J. Lieu, “Circumcision, Women and<br />
Salvation,” NTS 40 (1994), 358-70, here 364-67.<br />
127. Nolland, Luke, p. xxxii.<br />
291