05.06.2013 Views

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

One needs to search for as many th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> OT as possible that possibly <strong>in</strong>fluenced <strong>the</strong><br />

Lukan travel narrative, such as vocabulary, motifs, characters, or models. Moreover, <strong>the</strong><br />

Christological models (prophet, k<strong>in</strong>g, suffer<strong>in</strong>g servant, etc.) cannot be conf<strong>in</strong>ed only to <strong>the</strong><br />

travel narrative, but ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y saturate <strong>the</strong> whole Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke, not to mention <strong>the</strong><br />

Synoptic Gospels. Even R.F. O’Toole enumerates eight <strong>the</strong>mes as Lukan Christology: Jesus<br />

as Human Be<strong>in</strong>g, Jesus as Prophet, Jesus as Savior, Jesus as Servant <strong>of</strong> Yahweh, Jesus as <strong>the</strong><br />

Christ (<strong>the</strong> Messiah), Jesus <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> Man, Jesus <strong>the</strong> Son (<strong>of</strong> God), and Jesus as (<strong>the</strong>) Lord. 66<br />

The OT typologies are only one part <strong>of</strong> Luke’s rich Christology. From a source-critical<br />

perspective, on <strong>the</strong> one hand, Moessner so readily accepts Steck’s fourfold Deuteronomisitc<br />

scheme as <strong>the</strong> fram<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> travel narrative that he replaces Mk and Q as Luke’s<br />

sources. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Drury and Goulder make use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Deuteronomy hypo<strong>the</strong>sis to<br />

enhance <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> Luke’s dependence on Mt. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, Denaux pays strong<br />

attention to a diachronic approach as a methodological pr<strong>in</strong>ciple so that one safely studies <strong>the</strong><br />

Lukan travel narrative <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tertextuality between OT and NT texts. 67<br />

66. R.F. O’Toole, Luke’s Presentation <strong>of</strong> Jesus: A Christology (SB, 25, Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico,<br />

2004).<br />

67. Denaux, “Old Testament Models for <strong>the</strong> Lukan Travel Narrative,” 298.<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!