05.06.2013 Views

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Greg W. Forbes 59 sets out not only to make a unify<strong>in</strong>g motif <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>, but to<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong>se <strong>parables</strong> with <strong>the</strong> <strong>purpose</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke. He beg<strong>in</strong>s with a brief survey <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> research on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong> as well as <strong>the</strong> recent tendencies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> under a title, ‘The Parables: Key Factors <strong>in</strong> Historical<br />

Research.’ 60 Based on <strong>the</strong> forego<strong>in</strong>g analysis, he establishes some methodological bases and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n analyses <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>. What is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g about his search for possible unify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

motifs is <strong>the</strong> fact that he tries to observe it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> promise-fulfilment <strong>the</strong>me as <strong>the</strong><br />

overall <strong>purpose</strong> <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Gospel and <strong>the</strong> literary sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> conflict or controversy with<br />

contemporary Judaism. 61 From what he analysed, he contends that each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong><br />

conta<strong>in</strong>s ei<strong>the</strong>r an explicit or an implicit portrait to <strong>the</strong> character and nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> God that<br />

had its roots <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Testament. 62 He also ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that Luke is not only us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>parables</strong> to depict God’s nature, but he may also want to contrast Jesus’ portrayal <strong>of</strong> God with<br />

<strong>the</strong> view <strong>of</strong> God held by his Jewish contemporaries. 63 As such, <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong> perform<br />

not only a parenetic function but also an apologetic function to Gentile or Jewish Christians<br />

seek<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>ition vis-à-vis Judaism, <strong>in</strong> particular to Theophilus. The conclusion to be drawn<br />

here is that <strong>the</strong> portrayal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> character and nature <strong>of</strong> God <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong> is <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />

to <strong>the</strong> promise-fulfilment <strong>the</strong>me, whereby Luke wants to present to us that Jesus is <strong>the</strong><br />

legitimate fulfillment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Testament promise. 64 We shall deal later with his contention<br />

that all <strong>the</strong> features and <strong>the</strong>mes that are present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> are associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

character <strong>of</strong> God, ei<strong>the</strong>r directly or <strong>in</strong>directly. 65<br />

At <strong>the</strong> almost same time as G.W. Forbes’ work, Mikeal C. Parsons wrote a mean<strong>in</strong>gful<br />

66<br />

article about Lukan Parables . He beg<strong>in</strong>s with considerations <strong>of</strong> a classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>parables</strong> <strong>in</strong> order to know whe<strong>the</strong>r it is adequate to his study, ‘<strong>the</strong> Function <strong>of</strong> Lukan Parables<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan Travel Narrative’ <strong>in</strong> particular. As a result, he discards both Jeremias’ ten<br />

<strong>the</strong>matic categories and Scott’s classification on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> three <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elementary aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mediterranean social life and culture s<strong>in</strong>ce it does not assist <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

59. Forbes, The God <strong>of</strong> Old: The Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Purpose <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Gospel, 22-23.<br />

60. Ibid., 24-51.<br />

61. Ibid., 224, 225-260.<br />

62. Ibid., 261-278.<br />

63. Ibid., 279-306.<br />

64. Ibid., 328-329.<br />

65. For evaluation on <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Forbes, see D. Re<strong>in</strong>storf’s review article. Re<strong>in</strong>storf, “Luke’s <strong>parables</strong> and <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>purpose</strong> <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Gospel,” HTS 58/3 (2002), 1281-1295.<br />

66. Mikeal C. Parsons, “Landmarks Along The Way: The Function <strong>of</strong> The ‘L’ Parables <strong>in</strong> The Lukan Travel<br />

Narrative,” SJT 40 (1997), 33-47.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!