the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
05.06.2013 Views

miracle, apocalyptic, apothegm. According to him, the same chiastic pattern in Luke’s arrangement of the geography constructs Luke-Acts as a whole: “Galilee, Samaria, Judaea, Jerusalem, the Resurrection, Jerusalem, Judaea, Samaria, the uttermost part of the earth.” 33 In the central section, before and after the great interpolation (9:51-81:14) they implicitly display the presence of chiasmus in that the second prophecy of the passion in 9:44 corresponds to the third prophecy of the passion in 18:31, and that the setting of a child in the disciples’ midst in 9:46 is parallel to Jesus’ receiving the children in 18:15. However, a real chiasmus in the travel narrative does not appear until Luke’s exposition of Deuteronomy in 10:25. The chiastic structure is built on two Deuteronomic pillars of the Shema in Dt. 6:5 and Decalougue in Dt. 5:16. They are respectively parallel to 10:25 and 18:18. The main chiasmus in the Journey is as follows: a) 10:25 a’) 18:18 The Question how to inherit eternal life, b) 11:1 b’) 17:5 Faithful Prayer, illustrated by c) 11:14 c’) 17:11 A Healing d) 11:37 d’) 16:14 Pharisaic Hypocrisy, illustrated by e) 12:1 e’) 16:14 The love of Money f) 12:35 f’) 15:1 Repentance g) 13:10 g’) 14:1 Rejection of Israel and Invitation to the Outcast. In this way the travel narrative forms a chiasmus between the two Deuteronomic pillars: That is to say, the Great Commandments by which we shall inherit eternal life in 10:25 and 18:18. Amidst these are Jesus’ teaching about faithful prayer, his healing, his warning against Pharisaic hypocrisy and their love of money, his teaching about repentance, and finally a contrast between the rejection of Israel and invitation to the outcast. The intersection of the chiasmus is 13:34 with Jesus’ first lament over Jerusalem, thereby recalling Jesus’ word when 34 he comes to Jerusalem (19:41-44). C.H. Talbert who follows Goulder adds much more detail. He first divides it into eleven parts, beginning in 10:21: a) 10:21-24 a’) 18:15-17 Kingdom revealed to children, b) 10:25-37 b’) 18:18-20 Inheriting eternal life c) 10:38-42 c’) 18:9-14 De-emphasizing good works d) 11:1-13 d’) 18:1-8 God’s willingness to answer prayer 33. M.D. Goulder, “The Chiastic Structure of the Lucan Journey,” in ed., F.L. Cross, Studia Evangelica II (TU, 87, Berlin, 1964), 195-202, here 196. 34. Ibid., 195-202. 217

e) 11:14-36 e’) 17:11-37 Healing , Kingdom signs, judgment warning f) 11:37-54 f’) 17:1-10 Brotherly rebuke and meals g) 12:1-48 g’) 16:1-31 Hell, riches, and stewardship h) 12:49-13:9 h’) 14:25-15:32 Family loyalties, prudence, repentance i) 13:10-17 i’) 14:1-6 Sabbath healing, people more important than animals j) 13:18-30 j’) 14:7-24 Kingdom parables, banqueting, and the outcasts k) 13:31-33 k’) 13:34-35 Perishing in Jerusalem. In the two passages of the second column, the sequence of chiasmus breaks easily. Moreover, he has considerable difficulty in binding together a pair which bears little resemblance to each other. For this reason, he attributes chiasmus structures in the central section to the final redactor of the work. 35 Viewing the chiastic structure in the central section as the work of a pre-Lukan Jewish- Christian theologian, K.E. Bailey divides it into ten main sections, each of which include subdivisions and parallels: a) 9:51-56 a’) 19:10, 28-48 Jerusalem: eschatological events-day, death, fulfillment, judgment, salvation b) 9:57-10:12 b’) 18:35-19:9 Follow me: people come to Jesus, Jesus goes out c) 10:25-42 c’) 18:18-30 What shall I do to inherit eternal life? d) 11:1-13 d’) 18:1-14 Prayer: assurance, steadfastness, right approach e) 11:14-32 e’) 17:11-37 Sign and the (present/coming) kingdom: Son of man f) 11:37-12:34 f’) 16:9-31 Conflict with the Pharisees: money, heavenly treasure g) 12:35-59 g’) 16:1-8, 16 The kingdom is not yet and is now h) 13:1-9 h’) 14:12-15:32 The call of the kingdom to Israel (and outcasts) i) 13:10-20 i’) 14:1-11 The nature of the kingdom: love and not law-Sabbath healings, humility j) 13:22-35 Jerusalem: eschatological events-salvation, judgment, vision, fulfillment, death, day. He observes that, of the material in the travel narrative, about 90% constructs an inverted outline, with a few exceptions in some short pieces of tradition. It is striking that by means of repetition, Luke underlines Jerusalem on the outside and at the center of the so-called the Jerusalem Document. According to him, death and the eschatological day reach the acme of the document. The theme of humility is stressed in the second half of the inverted structure, introducing the theme from a discussion of humility in 14:7-11, concluding with the remark that, “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be 35. Talbert, Literary Patterns, Theological Themes, and the Genre of Luke-Acts, 51-56, later extends the chiasmus structures to the entire travel narrative. See Talbert, Reading Luke. A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel, 111-112. 218

e) 11:14-36 e’) 17:11-37 Heal<strong>in</strong>g , K<strong>in</strong>gdom signs, judgment warn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

f) 11:37-54 f’) 17:1-10 Bro<strong>the</strong>rly rebuke and meals<br />

g) 12:1-48 g’) 16:1-31 Hell, riches, and stewardship<br />

h) 12:49-13:9 h’) 14:25-15:32 Family loyalties, prudence, repentance<br />

i) 13:10-17 i’) 14:1-6 Sabbath heal<strong>in</strong>g, people more important than animals<br />

j) 13:18-30 j’) 14:7-24 K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>parables</strong>, banquet<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>the</strong> outcasts<br />

k) 13:31-33 k’) 13:34-35 Perish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Jerusalem.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> two passages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second column, <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> chiasmus breaks easily.<br />

Moreover, he has considerable difficulty <strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r a pair which bears little<br />

resemblance to each o<strong>the</strong>r. For this reason, he attributes chiasmus structures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> central<br />

section to <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al redactor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work. 35<br />

View<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> chiastic structure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> central section as <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> a pre-Lukan Jewish-<br />

Christian <strong>the</strong>ologian, K.E. Bailey divides it <strong>in</strong>to ten ma<strong>in</strong> sections, each <strong>of</strong> which <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

subdivisions and parallels:<br />

a) 9:51-56 a’) 19:10, 28-48 Jerusalem: eschatological events-day, death, fulfillment,<br />

judgment, salvation<br />

b) 9:57-10:12 b’) 18:35-19:9 Follow me: people come to Jesus, Jesus goes out<br />

c) 10:25-42 c’) 18:18-30 What shall I do to <strong>in</strong>herit eternal life?<br />

d) 11:1-13 d’) 18:1-14 Prayer: assurance, steadfastness, right approach<br />

e) 11:14-32 e’) 17:11-37 Sign and <strong>the</strong> (present/com<strong>in</strong>g) k<strong>in</strong>gdom: Son <strong>of</strong> man<br />

f) 11:37-12:34 f’) 16:9-31 Conflict with <strong>the</strong> Pharisees: money, heavenly treasure<br />

g) 12:35-59 g’) 16:1-8, 16 The k<strong>in</strong>gdom is not yet and is now<br />

h) 13:1-9 h’) 14:12-15:32 The call <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom to Israel (and outcasts)<br />

i) 13:10-20 i’) 14:1-11 The nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom: love and not law-Sabbath<br />

heal<strong>in</strong>gs, humility<br />

j) 13:22-35 Jerusalem: eschatological events-salvation, judgment,<br />

vision, fulfillment, death, day.<br />

He observes that, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> travel narrative, about 90% constructs an <strong>in</strong>verted<br />

outl<strong>in</strong>e, with a few exceptions <strong>in</strong> some short pieces <strong>of</strong> tradition. It is strik<strong>in</strong>g that by means <strong>of</strong><br />

repetition, Luke underl<strong>in</strong>es Jerusalem on <strong>the</strong> outside and at <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called <strong>the</strong><br />

Jerusalem Document. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to him, death and <strong>the</strong> eschatological day reach <strong>the</strong> acme <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> document. The <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> humility is stressed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>verted structure,<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me from a discussion <strong>of</strong> humility <strong>in</strong> 14:7-11, conclud<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> remark<br />

that, “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be<br />

35. Talbert, Literary Patterns, Theological Themes, and <strong>the</strong> Genre <strong>of</strong> Luke-Acts, 51-56, later extends <strong>the</strong><br />

chiasmus structures to <strong>the</strong> entire travel narrative. See Talbert, Read<strong>in</strong>g Luke. A Literary and Theological<br />

Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Third Gospel, 111-112.<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!