05.06.2013 Views

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

God, not by external piety like <strong>the</strong> confession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pharisee that “I thank <strong>the</strong>e that I am not<br />

like o<strong>the</strong>r men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a<br />

week, I give ti<strong>the</strong>s <strong>of</strong> all that I get (vv. 11-12).” What emerges from this brief discussion is<br />

that ‘Conversion’ is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major <strong>the</strong>ological <strong>the</strong>mes which occur repeatedly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan<br />

<strong>parables</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> travel narrative. In what follows, I will show how this <strong>the</strong>ological <strong>the</strong>me is <strong>in</strong><br />

accordance with <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> conversion <strong>of</strong> Luke’s <strong>the</strong>ology.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> outset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong> conversion <strong>in</strong> Luke, it is imperative to tackle repentance<br />

versus conversion. That is, “repentance” which would be expected <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jewish people as<br />

already believers <strong>in</strong> God, and “conversion” which would be expected <strong>of</strong> Gentiles. However,<br />

this dist<strong>in</strong>ction is unsusta<strong>in</strong>able from <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> Luke-Acts, particularly <strong>in</strong> Acts. This is<br />

largely because <strong>the</strong> repentance that leads to life is also given to <strong>the</strong> Gentiles (Acts 11:18), and<br />

a cont<strong>in</strong>uous need for conversion is also applicable to <strong>the</strong> Jews (Acts 14:15; 26:17-18). 2<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> E.P. Sanders’ argument that repentance is not a significant <strong>the</strong>me <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

3<br />

historical Jesus’ teach<strong>in</strong>g , it has largely been recognized that conversion is not only one <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> pivotal <strong>the</strong>mes <strong>of</strong> Jesus’ teach<strong>in</strong>g, but a major <strong>the</strong>me <strong>in</strong> Luke as well. It has been<br />

confirmed that conversion is a significant <strong>the</strong>me <strong>in</strong> Luke’s <strong>the</strong>ology through <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> conversion term more <strong>of</strong>ten than <strong>in</strong> any o<strong>the</strong>r synoptic <strong>gospel</strong>s, 4<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tentional edit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

2. Joel B. Green, “Do<strong>in</strong>g Repentance: The Formation <strong>of</strong> Disciples <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Acts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apostles,” Ex auditu 18<br />

(2002), 1-23, here 6-7; J.H. Wright, “Implications <strong>of</strong> Conversion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Testament and <strong>the</strong> New,”<br />

International Bullet<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> Missionary Research 28 (2004), 14-19; Andrew F. Walls, “Converts or Proselytes? The<br />

Crisis over Conversion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Early Church,” International Bullet<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> Missionary Research 29 (2004), 2-6. In<br />

early Christian literature, <strong>the</strong> emphasis on repentance, <strong>in</strong> contrast to Luke, describes discussions about Christians<br />

who s<strong>in</strong>ned after conversion as penitence with weep<strong>in</strong>g, pray<strong>in</strong>g, fast<strong>in</strong>g, confess<strong>in</strong>g one’s s<strong>in</strong>s, begg<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

forgiveness and <strong>the</strong> like. See Shepherd <strong>of</strong> Hemas, Ignatius (Phil. 8.1; Smyrn. 9.1), Clement (1 Clem. 7.4-7; 57.1;<br />

2 Clem. 8.1-2; 9.7-9) and <strong>the</strong> Didache (15.3). See also J.N. Bailey, ‘Repentance <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts,’ (PhD dissertation,<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame, 1993), 289.<br />

3. E.P. Sanders, Jesus and Judaism (London: SCM Press, 1985), 106-113, contradicts <strong>the</strong> position that<br />

repentance is a ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jesus’ teach<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> meager occurrences <strong>of</strong> and<br />

<strong>in</strong> Mark and Mat<strong>the</strong>w <strong>in</strong> comparison with Luke’s frequency. For criticisms <strong>of</strong> Sanders, see D.C.<br />

Allison, “Jesus and <strong>the</strong> Covenant: A Response to E.P. Sanders,” JSNT 29 (1987), 57-78; B.D. Chilton, “Jesus<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Repentance <strong>of</strong> E.P. Sanders,” TynBul 39 (1988), 1-18; N.T. Wright, Jesus and <strong>the</strong> Victory <strong>of</strong> God, 246-58.<br />

4. Even though, <strong>of</strong> course, it needs to consider both conceptional and term<strong>in</strong>al aspects <strong>of</strong> repentance, here,<br />

statistical analysis <strong>of</strong> conversion related <strong>terms</strong> will lead to clear grasp on Luke’s <strong>in</strong>terest and emphasis <strong>in</strong><br />

conversion. In <strong>the</strong> New Testament occurs 34 times <strong>of</strong> which 14 are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke (9 times)<br />

and Acts (5 times) compared to 5 times <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w and 2 <strong>in</strong> Mark, and is used 22 times <strong>of</strong> which 11<br />

appear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke (5 times) and Acts (6 times), compared to 2 times <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w and just 1 time <strong>in</strong><br />

Mark. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> , it is used 36 times <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament <strong>of</strong> which 18 exist<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke (7 times) and Acts (11 times) compared to 4 times <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w and 4 times <strong>in</strong> Mark. See J.<br />

Navone, Themes <strong>of</strong> St. Luke (Rome: Gregorian University, 1970), 38-46; Ronald D. Wi<strong>the</strong>rup, Conversion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

New Testament (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press; Wilm<strong>in</strong>gton, DE: Michael Glazier, 1994), 18-19; Fernando<br />

Méndez-Moratalla, The Paradigm <strong>of</strong> Conversion <strong>in</strong> Luke,18; Gregory E. Sterl<strong>in</strong>g, “Turn<strong>in</strong>g to God: Conversion<br />

183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!