05.06.2013 Views

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Conversion<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> that we have exam<strong>in</strong>ed, eight <strong>parables</strong> are concerned with conversion, ei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

explicitly or implicitly. Conversion is explicit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Barren Fig Tree (13:6-9; cf. 13:1-5)<br />

where <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> grace is said to be limited. In <strong>the</strong> parable <strong>the</strong>re are three ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts that<br />

correspond to each o<strong>the</strong>r: The figs that <strong>the</strong> farmer expects correspond to <strong>the</strong> fruit as God’s<br />

people. The cutt<strong>in</strong>g down <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tree without fruit accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> commandment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

farmer corresponds to judgment, and f<strong>in</strong>ally a potential additional year by suggestion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

v<strong>in</strong>edresser, corresponds to mercy. The parable is clearly a warn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> imm<strong>in</strong>ent judgment<br />

and a merciful call for <strong>the</strong> repentance <strong>of</strong> Israel <strong>of</strong>fered for a short while. All three <strong>parables</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Lost <strong>in</strong> Luke 15:1-32 pla<strong>in</strong>ly convey images <strong>of</strong> conversion. The shepherd and <strong>the</strong> woman<br />

<strong>in</strong> Luke 15:4-10 seek out <strong>the</strong> sheep and <strong>the</strong> co<strong>in</strong> that has been lost, appear to represent div<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiative. The great joy <strong>of</strong> salvation which is del<strong>in</strong>eated <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> lost as one s<strong>in</strong>ner who<br />

repents (15:7, 10) is celebrated. The younger son’s confession and return <strong>in</strong> Luke 15:11-24<br />

are s<strong>in</strong>cere acts <strong>of</strong> repentance, even though <strong>the</strong>re is doubt among scholars as to whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

confession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> younger son is au<strong>the</strong>ntic. Given <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> forgiveness and salvation <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r’s proclamation <strong>in</strong> v. 24 and 32, <strong>the</strong> imagery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> celebration may well convey <strong>the</strong><br />

messianic banquet. On <strong>the</strong> whole, <strong>the</strong> three <strong>parables</strong> teach that if God rejoices at <strong>the</strong> return <strong>of</strong><br />

s<strong>in</strong>ners, how much more should God’s people jump with joy over <strong>the</strong> return <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>ner? The<br />

parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rich man and Lazarus (16:19-31) is not designed to <strong>of</strong>fer details or a precise<br />

schedule about what happens after death, but ra<strong>the</strong>r to provide <strong>in</strong>structions concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> use<br />

<strong>of</strong> wealth, <strong>the</strong> sufficiency <strong>of</strong> Moses and <strong>the</strong> prophets, and repentance. In <strong>the</strong> second part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> parable with <strong>in</strong> v. 30, it is to some extent explicit that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong><br />

repentance here is represented as <strong>the</strong> proper use <strong>of</strong> possessions, and concern for <strong>the</strong> poor, as<br />

one aspect <strong>of</strong> it. 1<br />

We can also view <strong>the</strong> Great Feast (14:15-24) and <strong>the</strong> parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Unjust<br />

Steward (16:1-13) as <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> <strong>of</strong> conversion which implicitly carry images <strong>of</strong> conversion,<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that <strong>the</strong>y respectively convey <strong>the</strong> need <strong>of</strong> human response and for urgent decision<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> eschatological crisis. The parable <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Unjust Steward plays a <strong>role</strong> as a<br />

positive <strong>in</strong>stance, especially concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> proper use <strong>of</strong> unrighteous money <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> eschatological perspective. Lastly, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pharisee and Tax Collector (18:9-14), it plays a<br />

<strong>role</strong> as models <strong>of</strong> prayer, repentance, conversion and belief <strong>in</strong> Jesus, through <strong>the</strong> contrast<br />

between tax collectors and Pharisees. Justification before God is pert<strong>in</strong>ently expressed by a<br />

repentant heart <strong>of</strong> straightforward confession, entrust<strong>in</strong>g himself to <strong>the</strong> mercy and grace <strong>of</strong><br />

1. Ste<strong>in</strong>, Luke, 422.<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!