the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
prayer” (3:21; 5:16; 6:12; 9:18; 9:28-29; 11:1; 22:32, 39-46; 23:34, 46) and “his teaching on prayer” (11:2-4, 5-8, 9-13; 10:21-24; 18:1-8, 9-14; 21:36). Depending on whether or not the prayer of Jesus gives content to the prayer, his prayer may fall into two groups 5 : prayer passages with its content (3:21; 5:16; 6:12; 9:18; 9:28-29; 11:1), and no content to the prayer (22:32, 39-46; 23:34, 46). Apart from the prayer of Jesus in Luke’s Gospel, what is so noteworthy are the Canticles of Luke’s infancy narrative (1:46-55; 68-79; 2:29-32) that have largely been neglected as the theme of prayer in Luke-Acts. It is generally recognized that the Canticles of Luke’s infancy narrative are traditional hymns adapted by Luke. According to Stephen Farris, the Lucan canticles can be seen as part of Israel’s history, since the canticles bear the common features of words and reasons for praise that exist in canonical psalms and the extra-biblical psalmody. 6 To put it more accurately, Mary’s Magnificat reminds us of Hannah’s song of 1 Sam. 2:1-10, Leah’s rejoicing of Gen. 29:32, and Ps. 111:9. 7 In the same vein, Zechariah’s Benedictus seems to be based on Ps 105:8-9, 106:10, 45, and 111:9, on the other breath, Simeon’s Nunc Dimmittis bears a striking resemblance to Isa. 40:5, 42:6, and 52:10. Furthermore, all Lucan canticles also have certain similarities to Psalms of Solomon 10:4, the Dead Sea Scrolls, Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, and the fifteenth benediction of the Shemoneh Esreh in the writings of Second Temples Judaism. 8 Taking all that into consideration, we can say that the hymn comes from a Jewish Christian source. Luke not merely adapts the traditional hymns for the Canticles, but also puts it in the pattern of prophecy and fulfillment as proclamation from prophecy, not proof from prophecy. 9 Luke, in 5. R.J. Karris, Prayer and the New Testament (New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 2000), 40-81, sorts prayer of Jesus in Luke’s Gospel according to whether prayer passages of Jesus give content to the prayer or not. 6. Stephen C. Farris, “The Canticles of Luke’s Infancy Narrative: The Appropriation of a Biblical Tradition,” in ed., Richard N. Longenecker, Into God’s Presence: Prayer in the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Edermans Publishing, 2001), 91-112, especially 103. For more on the Canticles of Luke’s Infancy Narrative, see Raymond E. Brown, The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke (Garden City: Doubleday, 1976); Stephen C. Farris, The Hymns of Luke’s Infancy Narratives: Their Origin, Meaning and Significance (Sheffield: JSOT, 1985); Mark Coleridge, The Birth of the Lukan Narrative: Narratives as Christology in Luke 1-2 (Sheffield: JSOT, 1993); Samuel E. Balentine, Prayer in the Hebrew Bible: The Drama of Divine-Human Dialogue (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993); Karris, Prayer and the New Testament, 40-81. 7. This canticle, of course, may remind us of the song of Moses in Exod. 15:1-15, the song of Miriam in Exod. 15:21, the song of Deborah in Judg. 5:1-31 and many others. Cf. Green, Luke, 101. 8. Darrell L. Bock, Proclamation from Prophecy and Pattern: Lucan Old Testament Christology (Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1987), 358-60, 386-89, and 458; Farris, “The Canticles of Luke’s Infancy Narrative: The Appropriation of a Biblical Tradition,” 105-108. 9. Bock, Proclamation from Prophecy and Pattern: Lucan Old Testament Christology, 55-90, here 57, 88-89, claims that in keeping with Haggadah which bears the exposition of events, Luke his infancy narrative engages 175
the Canticles, proclaims the fulfillment of God’s purpose for his people through Jesus, the promised Messiah. Mary’s Song is composed of personal thanksgiving (1:46-50) and eschatological hope (1:51-55), moving from the personal to the corporate. God has shown mercy to Mary, and will undoubtedly bring his mercy to his faithful people as well. In this canticle, Mary clearly conveys her confidence, faith, and joy in the fulfillment of God’s promises to the reader. Zechariah’s Song can be divided into two parts: Benediction (1:68-75) that praises the coming of the Davidic ruler bringing deliverance, and Prophecy (1:76-79) that draws out the work of John in relationship to Jesus. The salvation that was promised to Abraham and to the nations comes to pass through the Davidic Messiah who gives light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, and guides our feet into the way of peace. Two images of salvation, namely, the one social and political, and the other spiritual, are interwoven to carry salvation’s vivid description. Simeon in his canticle believes it is God’s salvation that he has seen Jesus. The emphasis of Simeon’s Song is on the universality of the salvation that comes in Jesus, with “the Isaianic vision of the advent of God’s consolation and the mission of the Servant in Isaiah 40-66.” 10 Jesus’ mission, as the narrative unfolds further (2:34-35), will meet opposition. Taken together, all three canticles declare that God is saving his people in and through Jesus, according to his plan and promise. Even though there is much to say about Jesus’ prayer, it is not easy to single out common features from Jesus’ prayer and to tie them all together in a unifying theme. However, working towards finding overarching themes common to Jesus’ prayer is believed to be conducive to understanding the Lukan theology of prayer. First of all, what Luke suggests as one of the principle themes to Jesus’ prayer is that Jesus’ prayer-life is a role model for 11 believers. It is a widely accepted truth that Jesus was a man of prayer. For Jesus, prayer is a repeated habit (5:16). He prays at the crucial moment (6:12; 9:18, 29; 22-39-46), as well as at almost any time, place (3:21; 5:16; 6:12; 9:28-29; 22:39; 23:34, 46) and on every occasion, that is, in gratitude (10:21), at meals ( 9:16; 22:19; 24:30), and in the Ascension (24:50-51). The early Christian community in Acts prays as Jesus prayed, namely, “prayer at the selection and commissioning of leadership (1:24-25; 6:6; 13:3; 14:23), in the face of persecution and in proclamation from prophecy without showing specific passages grounded in Old Testament texts, rather than proof from prophecy with explicit citation for apology. 10. Green, Luke, 144; Bock, Luke, 245. 11. For more detail on this contention, especially see Roth, “Jesus the Pray-er,” CurTM, 493, 498-500; L.O. Harris, “Prayer in the Gospel of Luke,” 60, 69; E. Glenn Hinson, “Persistence in Prayer in Luke-Acts,” RevExp 104 (2007), 721-36, here 725-27. 176
- Page 133 and 134: netherworld for his bad deeds which
- Page 135 and 136: of the preaching of the resurrectio
- Page 137 and 138: about religion or theology.” 74 E
- Page 139 and 140: 9. The Judge and the Widow (18: 1-8
- Page 141 and 142: addition, such a formula also appea
- Page 143 and 144: The Old Testament taught the Israel
- Page 145 and 146: two court systems, for religious m
- Page 147 and 148: authoritative teacher. The adjectiv
- Page 149 and 150: however, no evidence to support his
- Page 151 and 152: interweaves the two points in the a
- Page 153 and 154: floating saying of Jesus, it comes
- Page 155 and 156: Josephus, the NT and rabbinic liter
- Page 157 and 158: they are portrayed as robbers, murd
- Page 159 and 160: collector on a par with swindlers,
- Page 161 and 162: eyes to heaven,” 59 “beating hi
- Page 163 and 164: humbles himself will be exalted”
- Page 165 and 166: subverts the expectation of the aud
- Page 167 and 168: Chapter 5 The Theological Themes of
- Page 169 and 170: Joachim Jeremais, New Testament The
- Page 171 and 172: the captives and recovering of sigh
- Page 173 and 174: preferentially opts for the poor li
- Page 175 and 176: marginalized, it is natural that he
- Page 177 and 178: Others link complete renunciation o
- Page 179 and 180: a symbolic function for possessions
- Page 181 and 182: possessions and give alms to the po
- Page 183: lessing prayer of the disciples bef
- Page 187 and 188: the Lord Jesus. Jesus’ prayer in
- Page 189 and 190: tells stories and composes prayers
- Page 191 and 192: 4. Conversion Of the parables that
- Page 193 and 194: sources regarding conversion texts,
- Page 195 and 196: and behaviour required of people to
- Page 197 and 198: gives a promise to do fourfold rest
- Page 199 and 200: the crowd in Jerusalem and Agrippa.
- Page 201 and 202: formation. 28 Secondly, conversion
- Page 203 and 204: eligion. 37 However, Bailey fails t
- Page 205 and 206: comes to a conclusion that conversi
- Page 207 and 208: 1-1. Lk 19:44 2 E.E. Ellis feels th
- Page 209 and 210: Linking 19:38a with the prefiguring
- Page 211 and 212: 1-4. Lk 19:28 16 17 J. Székely agr
- Page 213 and 214: this context. It seems intended so
- Page 215 and 216: 2. The Interpretational Approaches
- Page 217 and 218: main focus seems to be on reconcili
- Page 219 and 220: doing, he notes that Luke in partic
- Page 221 and 222: Luke made use of material available
- Page 223 and 224: which prevail in Hellenistic and bi
- Page 225 and 226: Jesus’ words and deeds have a fun
- Page 227 and 228: e) 11:14-36 e’) 17:11-37 Healing
- Page 229 and 230: arrangement that offer the Journey
- Page 231 and 232: truth.” 40 Rather than simply on
- Page 233 and 234: in the travel narrative Luke’s pu
prayer” (3:21; 5:16; 6:12; 9:18; 9:28-29; 11:1; 22:32, 39-46; 23:34, 46) and “his teach<strong>in</strong>g on<br />
prayer” (11:2-4, 5-8, 9-13; 10:21-24; 18:1-8, 9-14; 21:36). Depend<strong>in</strong>g on whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong><br />
prayer <strong>of</strong> Jesus gives content to <strong>the</strong> prayer, his prayer may fall <strong>in</strong>to two groups 5 : prayer<br />
passages with its content (3:21; 5:16; 6:12; 9:18; 9:28-29; 11:1), and no content to <strong>the</strong> prayer<br />
(22:32, 39-46; 23:34, 46). Apart from <strong>the</strong> prayer <strong>of</strong> Jesus <strong>in</strong> Luke’s Gospel, what is so<br />
noteworthy are <strong>the</strong> Canticles <strong>of</strong> Luke’s <strong>in</strong>fancy narrative (1:46-55; 68-79; 2:29-32) that have<br />
largely been neglected as <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> prayer <strong>in</strong> Luke-Acts. It is generally recognized that <strong>the</strong><br />
Canticles <strong>of</strong> Luke’s <strong>in</strong>fancy narrative are traditional hymns adapted by Luke. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
Stephen Farris, <strong>the</strong> Lucan canticles can be seen as part <strong>of</strong> Israel’s history, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> canticles<br />
bear <strong>the</strong> common features <strong>of</strong> words and reasons for praise that exist <strong>in</strong> canonical psalms and<br />
<strong>the</strong> extra-biblical psalmody. 6 To put it more accurately, Mary’s Magnificat rem<strong>in</strong>ds us <strong>of</strong><br />
Hannah’s song <strong>of</strong> 1 Sam. 2:1-10, Leah’s rejoic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Gen. 29:32, and Ps. 111:9. 7 In <strong>the</strong> same<br />
ve<strong>in</strong>, Zechariah’s Benedictus seems to be based on Ps 105:8-9, 106:10, 45, and 111:9, on <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r breath, Simeon’s Nunc Dimmittis bears a strik<strong>in</strong>g resemblance to Isa. 40:5, 42:6, and<br />
52:10. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, all Lucan canticles also have certa<strong>in</strong> similarities to Psalms <strong>of</strong> Solomon<br />
10:4, <strong>the</strong> Dead Sea Scrolls, Testaments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Twelve Patriarchs, and <strong>the</strong> fifteenth benediction<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Shemoneh Esreh <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Second Temples Judaism. 8 Tak<strong>in</strong>g all that <strong>in</strong>to<br />
consideration, we can say that <strong>the</strong> hymn comes from a Jewish Christian source. Luke not<br />
merely adapts <strong>the</strong> traditional hymns for <strong>the</strong> Canticles, but also puts it <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong><br />
prophecy and fulfillment as proclamation from prophecy, not pro<strong>of</strong> from prophecy. 9<br />
Luke, <strong>in</strong><br />
5. R.J. Karris, Prayer and <strong>the</strong> New Testament (New York: The Crossroad Publish<strong>in</strong>g Company, 2000), 40-81,<br />
sorts prayer <strong>of</strong> Jesus <strong>in</strong> Luke’s Gospel accord<strong>in</strong>g to whe<strong>the</strong>r prayer passages <strong>of</strong> Jesus give content to <strong>the</strong> prayer<br />
or not.<br />
6. Stephen C. Farris, “The Canticles <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Infancy Narrative: The Appropriation <strong>of</strong> a Biblical Tradition,” <strong>in</strong><br />
ed., Richard N. Longenecker, Into God’s Presence: Prayer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.:<br />
Edermans Publish<strong>in</strong>g, 2001), 91-112, especially 103. For more on <strong>the</strong> Canticles <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Infancy Narrative, see<br />
Raymond E. Brown, The Birth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Messiah: A Commentary on <strong>the</strong> Infancy Narratives <strong>in</strong> Mat<strong>the</strong>w and Luke<br />
(Garden City: Doubleday, 1976); Stephen C. Farris, The Hymns <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Infancy Narratives: Their Orig<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Mean<strong>in</strong>g and Significance (Sheffield: JSOT, 1985); Mark Coleridge, The Birth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan Narrative:<br />
Narratives as Christology <strong>in</strong> Luke 1-2 (Sheffield: JSOT, 1993); Samuel E. Balent<strong>in</strong>e, Prayer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Hebrew<br />
Bible: The Drama <strong>of</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e-Human Dialogue (M<strong>in</strong>neapolis: Fortress, 1993); Karris, Prayer and <strong>the</strong> New<br />
Testament, 40-81.<br />
7. This canticle, <strong>of</strong> course, may rem<strong>in</strong>d us <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> song <strong>of</strong> Moses <strong>in</strong> Exod. 15:1-15, <strong>the</strong> song <strong>of</strong> Miriam <strong>in</strong> Exod.<br />
15:21, <strong>the</strong> song <strong>of</strong> Deborah <strong>in</strong> Judg. 5:1-31 and many o<strong>the</strong>rs. Cf. Green, Luke, 101.<br />
8. Darrell L. Bock, Proclamation from Prophecy and Pattern: Lucan Old Testament Christology (Sheffield:<br />
JSOT Press, 1987), 358-60, 386-89, and 458; Farris, “The Canticles <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Infancy Narrative: The<br />
Appropriation <strong>of</strong> a Biblical Tradition,” 105-108.<br />
9. Bock, Proclamation from Prophecy and Pattern: Lucan Old Testament Christology, 55-90, here 57, 88-89,<br />
claims that <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g with Haggadah which bears <strong>the</strong> exposition <strong>of</strong> events, Luke his <strong>in</strong>fancy narrative engages<br />
175