05.06.2013 Views

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Prayer<br />

It should go without say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> three <strong>parables</strong> (11:5-8; 18:1-8, 9-14) <strong>in</strong> Luke are what<br />

Jesus’ teach<strong>in</strong>g on prayer is all about. Jesus <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Friend at Midnight (11:5-8) teaches <strong>in</strong><br />

effect, <strong>the</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>of</strong> a prayer response on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> God. The parable<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>s with <strong>the</strong> petitioner’s viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, which <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> boldness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> petitioner <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

face <strong>of</strong> opposition, and ends with <strong>the</strong> sleeper’s standpo<strong>in</strong>t, which is compared to God<br />

will<strong>in</strong>gly grant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> request. That is, <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable shifts naturally to <strong>the</strong><br />

attitude <strong>of</strong> prayer toward <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> God. The Judge and <strong>the</strong> Widow (18:1-8) makes two<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts from one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> characters <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> story: That is, <strong>the</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>of</strong> God hear<strong>in</strong>g<br />

prayer <strong>in</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judge and persistence <strong>in</strong> prayer from <strong>the</strong><br />

widow. The two po<strong>in</strong>ts are tightly <strong>in</strong>terwoven <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> application (v. 1 and vv. 6-8). The matter<br />

<strong>of</strong> how we rema<strong>in</strong> faithful until <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Man depends on persistence <strong>in</strong><br />

prayer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>of</strong> God’s hear<strong>in</strong>g prayer, namely, faith <strong>in</strong> God. 1<br />

Needless to say,<br />

persistence <strong>in</strong> prayer is a sign <strong>of</strong> faithfulness. The Pharisee and <strong>the</strong> Tax Collector (18:9-14)<br />

<strong>in</strong>structs directly on both <strong>the</strong> manner and content <strong>of</strong> prayer which occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparison<br />

between <strong>the</strong> Pharisee’s and <strong>the</strong> tax collector’s prayer. While <strong>the</strong> Pharisee depends on selfjustification,<br />

<strong>the</strong> tax collector entrusts himself to <strong>the</strong> mercy and grace <strong>of</strong> God, with<br />

straightforward confession. Crucial <strong>in</strong> prayer is <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> attitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

one pray<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prayer. The humility before God certa<strong>in</strong>ly calls forth<br />

God’s compassion and restoration. God is <strong>in</strong>deed open and receptive to <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>cere prayer <strong>of</strong><br />

his people. Tak<strong>in</strong>g all that <strong>in</strong>to consideration, it becomes clear that ‘Prayer’ is also one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

major <strong>the</strong>ological <strong>the</strong>mes that occur repeatedly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> travel narrative.<br />

In what follows, I will show how this <strong>the</strong>ological <strong>the</strong>me is <strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong><br />

prayer <strong>in</strong> Luke’s <strong>the</strong>ology.<br />

That Luke has a special <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> prayer can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

2<br />

observations: First, unlike <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Gospels, Luke beg<strong>in</strong>s with prayer and ends with prayer.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> one hand, Luke at <strong>the</strong> outset <strong>in</strong>troduces <strong>the</strong> people and Zechariah at prayer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

temple at <strong>the</strong> hour <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>cense (1:10, 13), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g three canticles <strong>in</strong> Luke’s Infancy Narrative<br />

(1:46-55; 1:68-70; 2:29-32). On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, he br<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>the</strong> Gospel to a close with Jesus’<br />

1. Marshall, “Jesus-Example and Teacher <strong>of</strong> Prayer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptic Gospels,” <strong>in</strong> ed., Richard N. Longenecker,<br />

Into God’s Presence: Prayer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Edermans Publish<strong>in</strong>g, 2001), 122.<br />

2. Craig G. Bartholomew and Robby Holt, “Prayer <strong>in</strong>/and <strong>the</strong> Drama <strong>of</strong> Redemption <strong>in</strong> Luke: Prayer and<br />

Exegetical Performance,” <strong>in</strong> ed., Craig G. Bartholomew, Joel B. Green, Anthony C. Thiselton, Read<strong>in</strong>g Luke:<br />

Interpretation, Reflection, Formation (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 2005), 350-75, here 354.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!