05.06.2013 Views

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong>re is no explicit reference to <strong>the</strong> <strong>role</strong> <strong>of</strong> faith as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Paul<strong>in</strong>e epistles. As for ,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a question as to whe<strong>the</strong>r it <strong>in</strong>dicates “ra<strong>the</strong>r than,” exclusively or “more than”<br />

comparatively. Doran claims that if one reads as “hav<strong>in</strong>g been pronounced<br />

,” it is possible to compare who is more upright or who is more observant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

duty toward God. 68 In this context, it is desirable, however, that God justified <strong>the</strong> Tax<br />

collector ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> Pharisee, that is, God did not justify <strong>the</strong> Pharisee. 69<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Scott contends that <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al audience would not have agreed with<br />

Jesus’ pronouncement, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re is no sign <strong>of</strong> true repentance as mention <strong>of</strong> restitution or<br />

restoration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount he had deceived o<strong>the</strong>rs. He argues that <strong>the</strong> story overthrows <strong>the</strong><br />

metaphorical structure that views <strong>the</strong> temple as <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> God, because <strong>the</strong> audience’s<br />

70<br />

expectations <strong>of</strong> what ought to happen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> temple area are shattered. Although Jesus’<br />

pronouncement seem<strong>in</strong>gly seems to be absurd, Jesus <strong>in</strong> no way is deny<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

compensation or a change <strong>of</strong> lifestyle, 71 whereas, as far as repentance is concerned, Jesus’<br />

attitude is <strong>in</strong>deed consistent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that <strong>the</strong>re is no condition or prerequisite for God’s<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial acceptance (Luke 5:18-26; 15:11-32; 19:1-10. Cf. 6:20-21; 7:36-50; 16:19-31). 72<br />

In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong>re is no <strong>in</strong>dictment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> parable, nor any negative expression or<br />

attitude toward <strong>the</strong> Temple.<br />

Even though many scholars, as have been po<strong>in</strong>ted out above, are <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to cast doubt on<br />

au<strong>the</strong>nticity <strong>of</strong> v. 14b, it is conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g that v. 14b came from Jesus from <strong>the</strong> outset, as a<br />

proverb which would have been uttered many times, <strong>in</strong> many circumstances by Jesus, for v.<br />

14b is fitt<strong>in</strong>g not only for <strong>the</strong> parable, but also for <strong>the</strong> entire Gospels’ teach<strong>in</strong>g which evokes<br />

humility before God. The readers, as a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, cannot obviously learn why <strong>the</strong> tax<br />

73<br />

collector is justified unless <strong>the</strong>y take v. 14b as orig<strong>in</strong>al with <strong>the</strong> parable. The phrase is an<br />

exact parallel to 14:11 where “for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who<br />

Hendrickx, The Parables <strong>of</strong> Jesus, 241.<br />

68. Doran, “The Pharisee and <strong>the</strong> Tax Collector: An Agonistic Story,” 262. See also L<strong>in</strong>nemann, Parables, 62,<br />

144 n. 11; Nolland, Luke, 878-79. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, J.B. Cortés, through text-criticism, proposes that<br />

, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> is a more proper read<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> phrase can be read<br />

exclusively ra<strong>the</strong>r than comparatively. Cortés, “The Greek Text <strong>of</strong> Luke 18:14a: A Contribution to <strong>the</strong> Method <strong>of</strong><br />

Reasoned Eclecticism,” CBQ 46 (1984), 255-273, here 262-63, 269-70.<br />

69. Kilgallen, “The Pharisee and <strong>the</strong> Publican (Luke 18:9-14): The Po<strong>in</strong>t?” ExpTim 114 (2003), 157-59, here<br />

158.<br />

70. Scott, Hear Then a Parable, 95-97.<br />

71. Repentance is typically regarded as a turn<strong>in</strong>g away from s<strong>in</strong>ful ways and back toward God.<br />

72. Forbes, The God <strong>of</strong> Old: The Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Purpose <strong>of</strong> Luke’s Gospel, 219.<br />

73. Snodgrass, Stories with Intent, 472.<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!