the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel
theological use of the parables later. In any event, it is clear that the results of this study could enhance our understanding of Luke’s purpose and his intention and concerns in the Gospel, as well as the Lukan parables. Therefore, I do expect that the results of this study will make great contributions to the research of the purpose of Luke’s Gospel. 5
Chapter 2 A History of Research of the Lukan Parables Of the best known and most loved of Jesus’ parables, many parables are found only in Luke’s Gospel and in particular clustered in the central section of the Gospel of Luke. One therefore anticipates that there would have been a number of studied works on the Lukan parables as a whole, but in reality there are even less than thought. More recently, most of the researchers on the Lukan parables, to my knowledge, tend to be limited to an analysis of individual parables. Although there are a few works on the Lukan parables, I think that it is worth dealing with a history of research on the Lukan parables, dividing it into two categories such as research on the parables as a whole in the Gospel of Luke, and research on the parables unique to Luke. 1. Research on the parables as a whole in the Gospel of Luke Regarding research on the parables as a whole in the Gospel of Luke, I am aware of the following five works: Those of M.D. Goulder, 1 G. Sellin, 2 J. Drury, 3 T.L. Noel, 4 and J.R. Donahue. 5 M.D. Goulder explores these differences of the parables in each gospel under five categories, concluding that the peculiarly Lukan and Matthean parables both differ enough from the Marcan parables. In the first category, ‘The Subjects of the Parables’, he claims that the Old Testament parable is predominantly a nature parable and this tradition is taken over in Mark, and that Mark’s parables are, therefore, predominantly nature parables. 6 He contends that, unlike Marcan parables, however, Matthew prefers magnificent subjects and expands, allegorizes, and urbanizes his parables, and that Luke focuses on the people of the town leaving behind the countryside. 7 In the ‘Scale of the Parables’, Goulder maintains that Mark’s world is the village, Galilaean village, and that Mattew has the grand scale, and 1. M.D. Goulder, “Characteristics of the Parables in the Several Gospels,” JTS 19 (1968), 51-69. 2. Gerhard Sellin, ‘Studien zu den grossen Gleichniserzählungen des Lukas-Sonderguts: Die - Erzählungen-besonders am Beispiel von Lk 10,25-37 sund 16,14-31 untersucht,’ (PhD dissertation: Münster, 1974); idem, “Gleichnisstrukturen,” LingBib 31 (1974), 89-115. 3. J. Drury, The Parables in the Gospels: History and Allegory (London: SPCK, 1985). 4. T.L. Noel, ‘Parables in Context: Developing a Narrative-Critical Approach to Parables in Luke’ (PhD dissertation; Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Kentucky, 1986). 5. John R. Donahue, The Gospel in Parable: Metaphor, Narrative, and Theology in the Synoptic Gospels (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988). 6. Goulder, “Characteristics of the Parables in the Several Gospels,” 51. 7. Ibid., 52-53. 6
- Page 1 and 2: THE ROLE OF THE LUKAN PARABLES IN T
- Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgements Even though writin
- Page 5 and 6: 6-3. The Parables of The Lost Coin
- Page 7 and 8: Abbreviations AB Anchor Bible ABD D
- Page 9 and 10: SVTQ Saint Vladimir’s Theological
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter 1 Introduction 1. Research
- Page 13: the Lukan parables, examining the t
- Page 17 and 18: parables, the soliloquies function
- Page 19 and 20: links between the parables and thei
- Page 21 and 22: Peasant and The Oriental Versions.
- Page 23 and 24: Greg W. Forbes 59 sets out not only
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 3 A Methodological basis fo
- Page 27 and 28: those of the evangelists. “There
- Page 29 and 30: estore their power and sense of dra
- Page 31 and 32: Secondly, irrespective of how the p
- Page 33 and 34: of the framing structure and in the
- Page 35 and 36: Part II An Analysis of the Lukan Pa
- Page 37 and 38: sever relations with the preceding
- Page 39 and 40: of neighbour, the lawyer would beli
- Page 41 and 42: the Samaritans clearly appears not
- Page 43 and 44: the kingdom breaks abruptly into on
- Page 45 and 46: 2. The Friend at Midnight (11:5-8)
- Page 47 and 48: With respect to v. 8 there are thre
- Page 49 and 50: (the petitioner) The noun , there
- Page 51 and 52: although he knows that it is second
- Page 53 and 54: The rich man in the parable intends
- Page 55 and 56: the parable. V. 21 is a repetition
- Page 57 and 58: either pointing to the meaning of t
- Page 59 and 60: ear fruit (Lev 19:23), 14 whereas B
- Page 61 and 62: parable, namely the three years and
- Page 63 and 64: 5. The Great Banquet (14: 15-24) 5-
Chapter 2<br />
A History <strong>of</strong> Research <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan Parables<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> best known and most loved <strong>of</strong> Jesus’ <strong>parables</strong>, many <strong>parables</strong> are found only <strong>in</strong> Luke’s<br />
Gospel and <strong>in</strong> particular clustered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> central section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke. One <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
anticipates that <strong>the</strong>re would have been a number <strong>of</strong> studied works on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong> as a<br />
whole, but <strong>in</strong> reality <strong>the</strong>re are even less than thought. More recently, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> researchers<br />
on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>, to my knowledge, tend to be limited to an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
<strong>parables</strong>. Although <strong>the</strong>re are a few works on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>, I th<strong>in</strong>k that it is worth<br />
deal<strong>in</strong>g with a history <strong>of</strong> research on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>, divid<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to two categories such<br />
as research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> as a whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke, and research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong><br />
unique to Luke.<br />
1. Research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> as a whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke<br />
Regard<strong>in</strong>g research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> as a whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke, I am aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g five works: Those <strong>of</strong> M.D. Goulder, 1 G. Sell<strong>in</strong>, 2 J. Drury, 3 T.L. Noel, 4 and J.R.<br />
Donahue. 5 M.D. Goulder explores <strong>the</strong>se differences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> <strong>in</strong> each <strong>gospel</strong> under five<br />
categories, conclud<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> peculiarly Lukan and Mat<strong>the</strong>an <strong>parables</strong> both differ enough<br />
from <strong>the</strong> Marcan <strong>parables</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> first category, ‘The Subjects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables’, he claims that<br />
<strong>the</strong> Old Testament parable is predom<strong>in</strong>antly a nature parable and this tradition is taken over <strong>in</strong><br />
Mark, and that Mark’s <strong>parables</strong> are, <strong>the</strong>refore, predom<strong>in</strong>antly nature <strong>parables</strong>. 6 He contends<br />
that, unlike Marcan <strong>parables</strong>, however, Mat<strong>the</strong>w prefers magnificent subjects and expands,<br />
allegorizes, and urbanizes his <strong>parables</strong>, and that Luke focuses on <strong>the</strong> people <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> town<br />
leav<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> countryside. 7<br />
In <strong>the</strong> ‘Scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables’, Goulder ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that<br />
Mark’s world is <strong>the</strong> village, Galilaean village, and that Mattew has <strong>the</strong> grand scale, and<br />
1. M.D. Goulder, “Characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Several Gospels,” JTS 19 (1968), 51-69.<br />
2. Gerhard Sell<strong>in</strong>, ‘Studien zu den grossen Gleichniserzählungen des Lukas-Sonderguts: Die -<br />
Erzählungen-besonders am Beispiel von Lk 10,25-37 sund 16,14-31 untersucht,’ (PhD dissertation: Münster,<br />
1974); idem, “Gleichnisstrukturen,” L<strong>in</strong>gBib 31 (1974), 89-115.<br />
3. J. Drury, The Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospels: History and Allegory (London: SPCK, 1985).<br />
4. T.L. Noel, ‘Parables <strong>in</strong> Context: Develop<strong>in</strong>g a Narrative-Critical Approach to Parables <strong>in</strong> Luke’ (PhD<br />
dissertation; Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Baptist Theological Sem<strong>in</strong>ary, Kentucky, 1986).<br />
5. John R. Donahue, The Gospel <strong>in</strong> Parable: Metaphor, Narrative, and Theology <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptic Gospels<br />
(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988).<br />
6. Goulder, “Characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Several Gospels,” 51.<br />
7. Ibid., 52-53.<br />
6