the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel the role of the lukan parables in terms of the purpose of luke's gospel

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
05.06.2013 Views

theological use of the parables later. In any event, it is clear that the results of this study could enhance our understanding of Luke’s purpose and his intention and concerns in the Gospel, as well as the Lukan parables. Therefore, I do expect that the results of this study will make great contributions to the research of the purpose of Luke’s Gospel. 5

Chapter 2 A History of Research of the Lukan Parables Of the best known and most loved of Jesus’ parables, many parables are found only in Luke’s Gospel and in particular clustered in the central section of the Gospel of Luke. One therefore anticipates that there would have been a number of studied works on the Lukan parables as a whole, but in reality there are even less than thought. More recently, most of the researchers on the Lukan parables, to my knowledge, tend to be limited to an analysis of individual parables. Although there are a few works on the Lukan parables, I think that it is worth dealing with a history of research on the Lukan parables, dividing it into two categories such as research on the parables as a whole in the Gospel of Luke, and research on the parables unique to Luke. 1. Research on the parables as a whole in the Gospel of Luke Regarding research on the parables as a whole in the Gospel of Luke, I am aware of the following five works: Those of M.D. Goulder, 1 G. Sellin, 2 J. Drury, 3 T.L. Noel, 4 and J.R. Donahue. 5 M.D. Goulder explores these differences of the parables in each gospel under five categories, concluding that the peculiarly Lukan and Matthean parables both differ enough from the Marcan parables. In the first category, ‘The Subjects of the Parables’, he claims that the Old Testament parable is predominantly a nature parable and this tradition is taken over in Mark, and that Mark’s parables are, therefore, predominantly nature parables. 6 He contends that, unlike Marcan parables, however, Matthew prefers magnificent subjects and expands, allegorizes, and urbanizes his parables, and that Luke focuses on the people of the town leaving behind the countryside. 7 In the ‘Scale of the Parables’, Goulder maintains that Mark’s world is the village, Galilaean village, and that Mattew has the grand scale, and 1. M.D. Goulder, “Characteristics of the Parables in the Several Gospels,” JTS 19 (1968), 51-69. 2. Gerhard Sellin, ‘Studien zu den grossen Gleichniserzählungen des Lukas-Sonderguts: Die - Erzählungen-besonders am Beispiel von Lk 10,25-37 sund 16,14-31 untersucht,’ (PhD dissertation: Münster, 1974); idem, “Gleichnisstrukturen,” LingBib 31 (1974), 89-115. 3. J. Drury, The Parables in the Gospels: History and Allegory (London: SPCK, 1985). 4. T.L. Noel, ‘Parables in Context: Developing a Narrative-Critical Approach to Parables in Luke’ (PhD dissertation; Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Kentucky, 1986). 5. John R. Donahue, The Gospel in Parable: Metaphor, Narrative, and Theology in the Synoptic Gospels (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988). 6. Goulder, “Characteristics of the Parables in the Several Gospels,” 51. 7. Ibid., 52-53. 6

Chapter 2<br />

A History <strong>of</strong> Research <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lukan Parables<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> best known and most loved <strong>of</strong> Jesus’ <strong>parables</strong>, many <strong>parables</strong> are found only <strong>in</strong> Luke’s<br />

Gospel and <strong>in</strong> particular clustered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> central section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke. One <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

anticipates that <strong>the</strong>re would have been a number <strong>of</strong> studied works on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong> as a<br />

whole, but <strong>in</strong> reality <strong>the</strong>re are even less than thought. More recently, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> researchers<br />

on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>, to my knowledge, tend to be limited to an analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

<strong>parables</strong>. Although <strong>the</strong>re are a few works on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>, I th<strong>in</strong>k that it is worth<br />

deal<strong>in</strong>g with a history <strong>of</strong> research on <strong>the</strong> Lukan <strong>parables</strong>, divid<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong>to two categories such<br />

as research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> as a whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke, and research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong><br />

unique to Luke.<br />

1. Research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> as a whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke<br />

Regard<strong>in</strong>g research on <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> as a whole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel <strong>of</strong> Luke, I am aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g five works: Those <strong>of</strong> M.D. Goulder, 1 G. Sell<strong>in</strong>, 2 J. Drury, 3 T.L. Noel, 4 and J.R.<br />

Donahue. 5 M.D. Goulder explores <strong>the</strong>se differences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>parables</strong> <strong>in</strong> each <strong>gospel</strong> under five<br />

categories, conclud<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> peculiarly Lukan and Mat<strong>the</strong>an <strong>parables</strong> both differ enough<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Marcan <strong>parables</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> first category, ‘The Subjects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables’, he claims that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Old Testament parable is predom<strong>in</strong>antly a nature parable and this tradition is taken over <strong>in</strong><br />

Mark, and that Mark’s <strong>parables</strong> are, <strong>the</strong>refore, predom<strong>in</strong>antly nature <strong>parables</strong>. 6 He contends<br />

that, unlike Marcan <strong>parables</strong>, however, Mat<strong>the</strong>w prefers magnificent subjects and expands,<br />

allegorizes, and urbanizes his <strong>parables</strong>, and that Luke focuses on <strong>the</strong> people <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> town<br />

leav<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> countryside. 7<br />

In <strong>the</strong> ‘Scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables’, Goulder ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that<br />

Mark’s world is <strong>the</strong> village, Galilaean village, and that Mattew has <strong>the</strong> grand scale, and<br />

1. M.D. Goulder, “Characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Several Gospels,” JTS 19 (1968), 51-69.<br />

2. Gerhard Sell<strong>in</strong>, ‘Studien zu den grossen Gleichniserzählungen des Lukas-Sonderguts: Die -<br />

Erzählungen-besonders am Beispiel von Lk 10,25-37 sund 16,14-31 untersucht,’ (PhD dissertation: Münster,<br />

1974); idem, “Gleichnisstrukturen,” L<strong>in</strong>gBib 31 (1974), 89-115.<br />

3. J. Drury, The Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospels: History and Allegory (London: SPCK, 1985).<br />

4. T.L. Noel, ‘Parables <strong>in</strong> Context: Develop<strong>in</strong>g a Narrative-Critical Approach to Parables <strong>in</strong> Luke’ (PhD<br />

dissertation; Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Baptist Theological Sem<strong>in</strong>ary, Kentucky, 1986).<br />

5. John R. Donahue, The Gospel <strong>in</strong> Parable: Metaphor, Narrative, and Theology <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Synoptic Gospels<br />

(Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988).<br />

6. Goulder, “Characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Parables <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Several Gospels,” 51.<br />

7. Ibid., 52-53.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!