05.06.2013 Views

A Dissertation by GRACE HUI-CHIN LIN Submitted to the Office of ...

A Dissertation by GRACE HUI-CHIN LIN Submitted to the Office of ...

A Dissertation by GRACE HUI-CHIN LIN Submitted to the Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

conventionalized method recommended <strong>by</strong> Rababah (2002). All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> discussion<br />

<strong>to</strong>pics for practicing using <strong>the</strong> five communication strategies were everyday life<br />

<strong>to</strong>pics downloaded from an English conversation learning website (The Internet<br />

Journal, 2005).<br />

Instruments <strong>of</strong> Interviews<br />

The instruments <strong>of</strong> interviews in this study were open-ended questions and a<br />

video camera. That is, <strong>the</strong> method <strong>of</strong> videotaping interviews through open-ended<br />

questions was applied in this study. A list <strong>of</strong> open-ended questions focusing on <strong>the</strong><br />

Taiwanese university learners’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> learning five communication strategies<br />

in Faerch and Kasper’s (1983c) taxonomy had been used in <strong>the</strong> videotaped interviews.<br />

The broad questions were more credible for eliciting <strong>the</strong> students’ perceptions<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y would not mislead <strong>the</strong> students’ statements <strong>of</strong> perceptions but made <strong>the</strong><br />

learners formulate <strong>the</strong>ir reflections <strong>of</strong> learning on <strong>the</strong>ir own (Schuman & Presser,<br />

1996).<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong> video camera was used in order <strong>to</strong> make <strong>the</strong> data trustworthy and<br />

reliable. Videotaping as an interview instrument made <strong>the</strong> data conformability<br />

checkable <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> fieldworkers (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). The reason it would be<br />

checkable was that not a detail would be lost if <strong>the</strong> whole interview process was<br />

taped. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> interview questions were more flexible, so that seven<br />

students’ perceptions in multi-patterns could be elicited more naturalistically. Besides,<br />

<strong>the</strong> videotaped data would be trustworthy because <strong>the</strong> field-workers would be able <strong>to</strong><br />

access <strong>the</strong> data and check <strong>the</strong> conformability between <strong>the</strong> collected qualitative data in<br />

<strong>the</strong> tape and <strong>the</strong> written findings in <strong>the</strong> report whenever <strong>the</strong> researchers needed <strong>to</strong> do<br />

this.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!