05.06.2013 Views

Observations Made in 1900 on Glaciers in British Columbia

Observations Made in 1900 on Glaciers in British Columbia

Observations Made in 1900 on Glaciers in British Columbia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1901.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 213<br />

OBSERVATIONS MADE IN <str<strong>on</strong>g>1900</str<strong>on</strong>g> ON GLACIERS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA.<br />

BY GEORGE AND WILLIAM S. VAUX, JR.<br />

While the glaciers noted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the follow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g report form but a small<br />

fracti<strong>on</strong> of the hundreds <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Rocky Mounta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>s of Canada, their<br />

c<strong>on</strong>t<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ued recessi<strong>on</strong> may be taken as an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicati<strong>on</strong> of the chances<br />

which are tak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g place <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the glaciers of the regi<strong>on</strong>. A moderate<br />

w<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ter, followed by an early and warm spr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g melted the snow and<br />

flooded the rivers at an early date. The c<strong>on</strong>t<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ued wet and stormy<br />

weather, which extended far <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>to the spr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g and summer, did<br />

much to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease the amount of melt<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. So far as it has been<br />

possible to determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e, all the glaciers of this regi<strong>on</strong> are still reced-<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. One excepti<strong>on</strong> to this rule was reported, but the advance<br />

could not be proved with any certa<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ty.<br />

VICTORIA GLACIER.<br />

The rocks marked last year to determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e the moti<strong>on</strong> and shr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>k-<br />

age of this glacier were aga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> noted <strong>on</strong> July 24, <str<strong>on</strong>g>1900</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The large<br />

block of limest<strong>on</strong>e about <strong>on</strong>e mile from the t<strong>on</strong>gue marked " VX<br />

'99 " appeared to have moved 147 feet, while a large block of<br />

sandst<strong>on</strong>e near the term<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>al mora<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e had an apparent moti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

115 feet. The general c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> of the glacier appears practically<br />

the same as last year. Measurements taken <strong>on</strong> the northwest side<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicate a shr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>kage of about six feet for the year. Several very<br />

f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e glacier tables were noted, <strong>on</strong>e be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a block of sandst<strong>on</strong>e<br />

eighteen <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ches thick, from ten to twelve feet <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> diameter, and<br />

elevated not less than five feet from the surface of the surround-<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g ice.<br />

ASULKAN GLACIER.<br />

This glacier has receded perceptibly s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce last year, the t<strong>on</strong>gue<br />

be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g twenty-four feet further up the valley than when last noted.<br />

There has also been a marked shr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>kage <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> every dimensi<strong>on</strong>.


214 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACADEMY OF [March,<br />

ILLECILLEWAET GLACIER.<br />

The very small recessi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the t<strong>on</strong>gue of the Illecillewaet<br />

Glacier dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the summer of 1899 was found to have been largely<br />

made up <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>1900</str<strong>on</strong>g>, so that the average of the two years was not far<br />

from that of the past thirteen, as previously noted.' A dist<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ct<br />

shr<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>kage was observed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> all dimensi<strong>on</strong>s, but this was most notice-<br />

able at the t<strong>on</strong>gue which was now 140 feet above the rock " C,"<br />

nearly twice the distance of the previous year.<br />

Our work the past summer c<strong>on</strong>sisted: (a) <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> tak<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the test pic-<br />

ture of the lower part of the glacier, which was made under unfav-<br />

orable c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> August 7, <str<strong>on</strong>g>1900</str<strong>on</strong>g>; (b) locati<strong>on</strong> of the border<br />

of the ice <strong>on</strong> the map of 1899, and (e) locati<strong>on</strong> and measurement<br />

of moti<strong>on</strong> of l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e of plates across the glacier.<br />

a. Of the test picture noth<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g need be added except that the<br />

series is now complete for three c<strong>on</strong>secutive years and furnishes<br />

a most <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terest<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g illustrati<strong>on</strong> of the comparatively slight and yet<br />

n<strong>on</strong>e the less c<strong>on</strong>stant changes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the c<strong>on</strong>tour of the ice.<br />

b. The positi<strong>on</strong> of the edge of the ice was easily located with<br />

reference to the several fixed rocks laid out <strong>on</strong> the general survey<br />

of 1899. The plott<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of this border l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e showed that the glacier<br />

had receded an average of not far from twenty feet <strong>on</strong> the sides<br />

and sixty-four feet <strong>on</strong> the extreme t<strong>on</strong>gue. At <strong>on</strong>e po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>t the ice<br />

seemed to have changed but little s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce last year, while at others<br />

the recessi<strong>on</strong> was more than 100 feet. This c<strong>on</strong>stant yearly reces-<br />

si<strong>on</strong> has been proved to be <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> progress at least s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce 1887.<br />

c. The locati<strong>on</strong> and measurement of the l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e of eight plates<br />

across the glacier, which were first laid out <strong>on</strong> July 31, 1899, and<br />

had c<strong>on</strong>sequently been <strong>on</strong> the ice almost exactly <strong>on</strong>e vear, waa<br />

taken up <strong>on</strong> the 6th of August, <str<strong>on</strong>g>1900</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>on</strong> which date plates Nos.<br />

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were located. Plate No. 8 could not be<br />

found, and it was not discovered till several days later, when its<br />

positi<strong>on</strong> also was obta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed.<br />

All the plates seem to have moved <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>es almost parallel with<br />

the centre l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e of the glacier. The follow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g table shows the,<br />

moti<strong>on</strong> of the plates for tne year, and also repeats for comparis<strong>on</strong><br />

the moti<strong>on</strong>s determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the fall of 1899, after the plates had<br />

been <strong>on</strong> the ice but thirty-six days. It will be noted that the c<strong>on</strong>-<br />

1 oceed<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1899,<br />

p. 124.


1901.] NATURAL SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA. 215<br />

cave or northeast side has a greater daily moti<strong>on</strong> than last year,<br />

while the Xc<strong>on</strong>vex or southwest has not moved at quite so rapid a<br />

rate. Whether this change is accidental or is the result of peculiar<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s has not been determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed.<br />

While the plates were left <strong>on</strong> the surface of the glacier, it is<br />

hardly likely that future measurements will be of great value,<br />

should the plates be aga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> found. They are approach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a much<br />

rougher porti<strong>on</strong> of the glacier, broken by crevasses, deep wells<br />

an(1 seracs, and even should they rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the surface, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> many<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>stances it will be impossible to see them from the base l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e.<br />

They have, however, served their purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> dem<strong>on</strong>strat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g that the<br />

average moti<strong>on</strong> of nearly two feet per day as determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed by Dr.<br />

W. S. Green <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1888 was either much greater than the actual<br />

moti<strong>on</strong>, or was the result of c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s which do not now exist.<br />

Table show<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Total Average Daily ioti<strong>on</strong> of L<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e of Plates <strong>on</strong><br />

JlleciUlewaet Glacier, Glacier House, B. C.<br />

Number TotaMot<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>froJulAverage<br />

Daily Moti<strong>on</strong> Average Daily Moti<strong>on</strong><br />

Number Total MIoti<strong>on</strong> from JTuly<br />

from July 31, 1899, to from July 31, 1899, to<br />

of 31, 1899, to August 6,,<br />

P August 6, <str<strong>on</strong>g>1900</str<strong>on</strong>g>-372 September 5, 1899-<br />

days (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ches). 36 days (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ches).<br />

1 1063 2.86 2.56<br />

2 1488 4. 3.90<br />

3 1677 4.51 5.51<br />

4 2172 5.84 6.77<br />

5 2256 6.07 6.06<br />

6 2364 6A36 6.79<br />

7 1902 5.11 6.16<br />

8 2040 5.48 6.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!