Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

05.06.2013 Views

2.2 FRAMEWORK AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE POLICY RESPONSE ChANGING ThE TIDE: USING ECoNoMIC INfoRMATIoN To IMPRovE PUBLIC PoLICIES “Poverty and environmental problems are both children of the same mother, and that mother is ignorance“. Ali hassan Mwinyi, Tanzanian President in 1998 There is a compelling rationale for governments to lead efforts to safeguard ecosystem services and biodiversity. Public environmental policy needs to be based on moral values (concern for human well-being), intrinsic values (not letting species go extinct) and good stewardship, whilst taking economic considerations into account. These overarching values need to guide and shape new policy responses to reduce current losses and invest in healthy functioning ecosystems for the future. Private actors (businesses and consumers) have a growing role to play in choices that affect our natural capital. however, a strong policy framework is needed to ensure that decisions are efficient (society gets the most it can from its scarce biodiversity) and equitable (the benefits of biodiversity are distributed fairly). Appropriate regulation provides the context in which markets for certain ecosystem services can evolve as well as mechanisms to monitor their effectiveness. Copyright by Felix Schaad and Claude Jaermann (Switzerland). 2.2.1 HOW CAN ECONOMIC VALUES HELP? Focusing on the services provided by biodiversity and ecosystems is critical to overcome their traditional neglect. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (see Chapter 1) paved the way for indicators to show the status of ecosystem services (see Chapter 3). TEEB goes one step further by using information on the value of such services to give new impetus to decision-making. The transition from acknowledging services to valuing them may seem a small step but it is a huge step towards raising awareness. We can now demonstrate that biodiversity and ecosystem services have value, not only in the narrow sense of goods and services in the marketplace but also – and more importantly – because they are essential for our lives, survival and wellbeing. This is the case even if markets do not exist or if these values are not expressed in monetary terms: values can also be based on qualitative or semi-quantitative assessments. What we actually measure in monetised form is very often only a share of the total value of ecosystem services and biodiversity. ‘True’ values are usually much higher (see Chapter 4). valuation can help policy-makers by shedding light on the contribution made by different ecosystem services, whether directly and indirectly (see Box 2.2). Using economic values during the choice and design of policy instruments can: • help overcome the systematic bias in decisionmaking by demonstrating the equivalence of values (between e.g. manufactured capital and natural capital, present and future benefits/costs, and different resource types) even where these are not monetised or represented by market prices; TEEB foR NATIoNAL AND INTERNATIoNAL PoLICy MAKERS - ChAPTER 2: PAGE 6

FRAMEWORK AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE POLICY RESPONSE Box 2.2: Multiple values of wetlands: example of the Daly River catchment (Australia) A 2008 study to assess the value of one catchment in the Northern Territory covering over 350,000 hectares put the current use value at about Aus$ 390/hectare (almost Aus$ 139 million for the whole catchment). Estimated values in 2004 per hectare for different catchment benefits included: • carrier function for crop growing, pastoralism and crocodile hunting: Aus$ 31/ha; • habitat function as a contribution to nature conservation: Aus$ 1/ha; • regulation function (water use, carbon sequestration): Aus$ 298/ha; • information function/cultural service (tourism, recreational fishing): Aus$ 57/ha. Source: de Groot et al. 2008 • demonstrate that even if biodiversity benefits are multi-faceted and diffuse, they can be subsumed or aggregated within certain broader values (e.g. for forests); • help create new markets where none previously existed (e.g. the recently created markets for GhG emissions are powerful examples from climate policy of what can be achieved where market-based approaches are developed for environmental goods within a strong policy framework); and • help to make future benefits visible, rather than simply relying on today’s costs (e.g. by identifying option values of plants from tropical forests relevant for pharmaceutical products, or the potential of tourism). 2.2.2 WHEN CAN ECONOMIC VALUES HELP? There are many steps in the policy-making process where information on ecosystem and biodiversity values can be systematically used. Economic information is an important vehicle to raise public awareness and to address new policies in the process of agenda setting or policy formulation. It can form the basis for new policies – and can provide starting points for policy change (see Table 2.1). TEEB foR NATIoNAL AND INTERNATIoNAL PoLICy MAKERS - ChAPTER 2: PAGE 7 Source: Christoph Schröter-Schlaack

FRAMEWORK AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE POLICY RESPONSE<br />

Box 2.2: Multiple values of wetlands: example<br />

of the Daly River catchment (Australia)<br />

A 2008 study to assess the value of one catchment<br />

in the Northern Territory covering over 350,000<br />

hectares put the current use value at about Aus$<br />

390/hectare (almost Aus$ 139 million for the whole<br />

catchment). Estimated values in 2004 per hectare<br />

for different catchment benefits included:<br />

• carrier function for crop growing, pastoralism<br />

and crocodile hunting: Aus$ 31/ha;<br />

• habitat function as a contribution to nature<br />

conservation: Aus$ 1/ha;<br />

• regulation function (water use, carbon sequestration):<br />

Aus$ 298/ha;<br />

• information function/cultural service (tourism,<br />

recreational fishing): Aus$ 57/ha.<br />

Source: de Groot et al. 2008<br />

• demonstrate that even if biodiversity benefits are<br />

multi-faceted and diffuse, they can be subsumed<br />

or aggregated within certain broader values (e.g. for<br />

forests);<br />

• help create new markets where none previously<br />

existed (e.g. the recently created markets for GhG<br />

emissions are powerful examples from climate<br />

policy of what can be achieved where market-based<br />

approaches are developed for environmental goods<br />

within a strong policy framework); and<br />

• help to make future benefits visible, rather than<br />

simply relying on today’s costs (e.g. by identifying<br />

option values of plants from tropical forests relevant<br />

for pharmaceutical products, or the potential of<br />

tourism).<br />

2.2.2 WHEN CAN ECONOMIC VALUES<br />

HELP?<br />

There are many steps in the policy-making process<br />

where information on ecosystem and biodiversity values<br />

can be systematically used. Economic information is an<br />

important vehicle to raise public awareness and to<br />

address new policies in the process of agenda setting<br />

or policy formulation. It can form the basis for new<br />

policies – and can provide starting points for policy<br />

change (see Table 2.1).<br />

<strong>TEEB</strong> foR NATIoNAL AND INTERNATIoNAL PoLICy MAKERS - ChAPTER 2: PAGE 7<br />

Source: Christoph Schröter-Schlaack

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!