05.06.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Market-based instruments (MBI) to price resource use<br />

have They can, if<br />

set at sufficient rates, make the polluter pay more<br />

explicitly than regulation and put the full cost recovery<br />

principle into effect. Experience shows that environmental<br />

goals may be reached more efficiently with<br />

potential for cost savings – however, actual cost<br />

savings depend on instrument design and implementation<br />

as well as the ecosystem service in question.<br />

Lastly, pricing instruments can generate public<br />

revenues that can be used to finance biodiversityfriendly<br />

policies.<br />

IMPLEMENTATIoN oF ThE<br />

PoLLUTER/USER PAyS PRINCIPLE<br />

Direct regulation and the use of MBIs are both in accordance<br />

with the polluter pays principle but<br />

. MBIs<br />

confront actors with at least part of the environmental<br />

and social costs their actions cause (i.e. costs that<br />

were previously externalised and thus not considered<br />

in private decision-making) and lead to explicit payments.<br />

Tax bills or permit prices are more transparent<br />

and more easily mainstreamed into private accounts<br />

than investments in technical adaptations to comply<br />

with environmental regulations.<br />

Boxes 7.11-7.13 present successful examples of using<br />

different MBIs for specific goals.<br />

Product taxes are important drivers of ecosystem change.<br />

provide an incentive to increase efficiency in fertiliser use for crops and thereby reduce negative externalities.<br />

Application of various schemes saw decreases in product use (and subsequent reduction of levels in soil and<br />

water) of 20-30% in the Netherlands, 11-22% in Finland, 15-20% in Sweden and 15% in Austria. (Ecotec<br />

2001).<br />

In 2002, Ireland introduced a ; customers now pay 33 cents per bag at checkout. Plastic<br />

bag consumption dropped by 80% from 1.2 billion to 230 million bags in the first year, generating tax revenues<br />

(US$ 9.6 million) earmarked for a green fund. The tax also halted a major import as only 21% of plastic bags<br />

were manufactured in Ireland (New york Times, 2 Feb 2008).<br />

Papua New Guinea has significant foreign receipts through exporting crocodile skins, mainly to Japan. To<br />

promote sustainable resource use, provide an important source of funding for control<br />

and monitoring operations by the Department of Conservation (hunt, 1997).<br />

The Eritrean government implemented a series of , including subsidies<br />

to kerosene, promotion of energy-efficient fuel-wood stoves and dismantling of duties on imported solar technology.<br />

The goal was to encourage people to consume less fuelwood, thus addressing deforestation and forest<br />

degradation problems in the country (UNDP 2001).<br />

<strong>TEEB</strong> FoR NATIoNAL AND INTERNATIoNAL PoLICy MAKERS - ChAPTER 7: PAGE 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!