05.06.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CERTIFICATION OF SUSTAINABLE<br />

FISHERIES<br />

REWARDING BENEFITS THROUGH PAYMENTS AND MARKETS<br />

Table 5.3: Global supply of roundwood from certified resources (2007-2009)<br />

Region Total forest area<br />

(million ha)<br />

North<br />

America<br />

Western<br />

Europe<br />

CIS<br />

Oceania<br />

Africa<br />

Latin<br />

America<br />

Asia<br />

World total<br />

470.6<br />

155.5<br />

907.4<br />

197.6<br />

649.9<br />

964.4<br />

524.1<br />

3,869.5<br />

2007<br />

164.2<br />

80.8<br />

20.6<br />

9.9<br />

2.6<br />

12.1<br />

1.6<br />

291.8<br />

As demand for fish and other marine and aquatic species<br />

continues to increase and the commercial fishing industry<br />

goes to ever greater lengths to access new fish resources,<br />

a consensus is emerging that the world’s fisheries are in<br />

peril. The impact of fisheries and aquaculture on the wider<br />

marine and coastal environment is also of grave and growing<br />

concern. Aquaculture expansion, seen as a means<br />

to reduce pressures on wild stocks, has been implicated<br />

in the loss of coastal habitat (e.g. mangroves in tropical<br />

zones) whilst the farming of higher value species (e.g. salmon<br />

and prawns) still requires substantial fishmeal inputs.<br />

The fisheries sector has a substantial direct interest in<br />

engaging with the issue of biodiversity and ecosystem<br />

protection to:<br />

• secure long-term supplies of target fish. Healthy<br />

ecosystems have higher productivity, but require<br />

management of the ecosystem as a whole;<br />

• safeguard reputation and access to markets.<br />

Consumers and retailers are increasingly concerned<br />

about the impacts of fisheries on target and nontarget<br />

species and seabed habitats and are demanding<br />

assurances that the industry take action to<br />

address them.<br />

Total certified forest area<br />

(million ha)<br />

2008<br />

181.7<br />

84.2<br />

24.6<br />

9.4<br />

3.0<br />

15.0<br />

2.0<br />

319.9<br />

2009<br />

180.3<br />

82.2<br />

25.2<br />

10.3<br />

5.6<br />

14.6<br />

3.0<br />

321.1<br />

Total forest area certified (%)<br />

2007<br />

34.9<br />

52.0<br />

2.3<br />

5.0<br />

0.4<br />

Several initiatives have been launched to conserve<br />

fish stocks more effectively. The FAO Code of Conduct<br />

for Responsible Fisheries establishes a voluntary<br />

framework on which to base sustainable fishing<br />

practices 29 . The Seafood Choices Alliance, a global<br />

association of fishers, fish farmers, wholesalers and<br />

restaurants, works to promote ocean-friendly seafood<br />

30 . For tuna, the Global Tuna Conservation Initiative<br />

launched by WWF and TRAFFIC is working to<br />

establish an ecosystem-based management approach<br />

for tuna stocks 31 .<br />

Of the fisheries market labels, the Marine Stewardship<br />

Council (MSC) is the most widely recognised and has<br />

the largest geographic coverage (see Box 5.24).<br />

CERTIFICATION OF BIODIVERSITY-<br />

FRIENDLY AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES<br />

The impact of agricultural practices (e.g. conversion<br />

and degradation of natural habitat, pollution) has been<br />

identified as the main reason for the loss of terrestrial<br />

biodiversity (sCBD and MNP 2007). By 1990, over two<br />

thirds of the area within two of the world’s fourteen<br />

major terrestrial biomes and over half of the area within<br />

four others had been converted, primarily for agriculture<br />

(MA 2005b).<br />

<strong>TEEB</strong> FOR NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL POLICY MAKERS - CHAPTER 5: PAGE 48<br />

1.3<br />

0.3<br />

7.5<br />

2008<br />

38.6<br />

54.1<br />

2.7<br />

4.8<br />

0.5<br />

1.6<br />

0.4<br />

8.3<br />

2009<br />

38.3<br />

52.8<br />

2.8<br />

5.2<br />

0.9<br />

1.5<br />

0.6<br />

8.3<br />

Sources: UNECE/FAO (2009) using individual certification schemes;<br />

the Canadian Sustainable Forestry Certification Coalition; FAO and authors’ compilations 2009.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!