05.06.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REWARDING BENEFITS THROUGH PAYMENTS AND MARKETS<br />

Box 5.14: Think PINC – the ‘Proactive Investment in Natural Capital’ proposal<br />

“We propose that a new mechanism of Proactive Investment in Natural Capital (PINC) is created<br />

to promote adaptation in existing protected areas and standing forests that may not benefit directly<br />

from REDD funds.”<br />

SHAPING IPES AND GLOBAL INVEST-<br />

MENT IN BIODIVERSITY<br />

Different approaches for international transfers for biodiversity<br />

conservation and for mobilising international investment<br />

in natural capital have been proposed. Boxes 5.14<br />

and 5.15 describe some recent ideas and initiatives.<br />

Without the means to make a global ecosystem service<br />

‘excludable’ – i.e. limiting its use by non-paying benefactors<br />

– alternative ways must be found to create demand<br />

for investment in such services. This argument<br />

also applies to international agreements on access and<br />

benefit sharing (see Section 5.3 below). Global targets<br />

for contributions to biodiversity conservation can be used<br />

to determine burden sharing and/or market mechanisms<br />

can offer countries the option to deliver certain ecosystem<br />

services in a more cost-efficient way (e.g. Tradable<br />

Conservation Obligations, see Box 5.15).<br />

Whatever approach is taken, international agreements<br />

supported by national legislation are likely<br />

to be needed to ensure sustainable long-term<br />

financing for global biodiversity. Governments<br />

should seek ways to engage the private sector and<br />

to create appropriate incentives for business to reduce<br />

adverse impacts and invest in biodiversity<br />

and ecosystem services.<br />

<strong>TEEB</strong> FOR NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL POLICY MAKERS - CHAPTER 5: PAGE 33<br />

Trivedi et al. (2009)<br />

PINC, proposed by the Global Canopy Programme, seeks to<br />

act as a complementary funding stream to a REDD mechanism<br />

for large areas of standing forests that are not immediately threatened<br />

or may not benefit from REDD (depending on its design<br />

and implementation). It recognises the immense value of tropical<br />

forests in monetary and non-monetary terms and calls for a mechanism<br />

to reward the function of large areas of forests as global<br />

providers of multiple ecosystem services beyond carbon storage<br />

(e.g. biodiversity protection, rainfall generation, water supply<br />

regulation and atmospheric cooling, which are likely to<br />

become increasingly important as a result of climate change).<br />

Source: Trivedi et al. 2009<br />

Box 5.15: Stimulating international demand<br />

for biodiversity through a Green Development<br />

Mechanism<br />

The Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and<br />

the Environment (VROM), the International Union for<br />

Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the United Nations<br />

Environment Programme (UNEP), in cooperation with<br />

the CBD Secretariat, are facilitating expert discussions<br />

ahead of CBD COP-10 (Nagoya 2010) on new international<br />

incentives for biodiversity. The Green Development<br />

Mechanism (GDM) initiative seeks to<br />

create a global mechanism to stimulate demand for<br />

the preservation and sustainable use of biodiversity<br />

and to mobilise new and sustained financial support.<br />

A range of different potential instruments are being explored.<br />

Tradable Conservation Obligations are one<br />

way in which countries could commit to contribute to<br />

certain biodiversity conservation targets, within national<br />

borders or abroad (hence ‘tradable’). Other ideas<br />

include footprint compensation measures (e.g. donation<br />

levels that use footprint as one of a mix of indicators)<br />

and coordination of biodiversity offset obligations<br />

(eg ‘no net loss’ commitments) at the international<br />

level.<br />

See also: Swanson 2009; Swanson, Mullan and Kontoleon 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!