05.06.2013 Views

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

Download (PDF, 6.71MB) - TEEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTEGRATING ECOSYSTEM AND BIODIVERSITY VALUES INTO POLICY ASSESSMENT<br />

Box 4.1: Mapping links between supply of ecosystem services and beneficiaries<br />

The diagram below shows how a partially forested watershed provides different services to different populations<br />

in the vicinity some benefit downstream from the services it provides; others are in the area but do<br />

not benefit; and others not only benefit from those services but also influence them through activities that<br />

degrade or enhance the natural capital.<br />

This type of information is useful to understand which stakeholders need to be involved or taken into account<br />

when designing ecosystem management approaches and choosing instruments to reward benefits (see<br />

chapter 5), or avoid impacts (see chapter 7).<br />

4.1.3 APPLYING TOTAL ECONOMIC<br />

VALUE FRAMEWORKS TO<br />

ECOSYSTEMS<br />

To correct the current distortion in policy trade-offs,<br />

valuation is a critical step towards ensuring that ecosystem<br />

services are given the right weight in decisions.<br />

The Total Economic Value (TEV) framework is a<br />

well structured way to consider all of the values<br />

that an ecosystem provides. figure 4.3 presents key<br />

elements of TEv, well known to some, and gives links<br />

to different ecosystem services) 1 . It is based on two<br />

broad categories of value:<br />

• ‘Use values’ include direct and indirect use of<br />

ecosystems and options for future use. Direct<br />

use value arises from the direct use of an eco-<br />

Source: Adapted from Balmford et al. 2008<br />

system good or service and can include<br />

consumptive use (e.g. timber production) and<br />

non-consumptive use (e.g. wildlife viewing).<br />

Indirect use value refers to benefits derived not<br />

from direct consumption but from effects on<br />

other goods and services which people value<br />

(e.g. regulating services for water are valued<br />

because they protect people and property<br />

against flooding; pollination is important for food<br />

production). Option use values represent the<br />

value of having the option of using (both directly<br />

and indirectly) the ecosystem good or service in<br />

the future.<br />

• Non-use values exist because people derive<br />

pleasure from simply knowing that nature and its<br />

elements (e.g. a rare species) exist, or because<br />

they wish to bequest it to future generations.<br />

<strong>TEEB</strong> for NATIoNAL AND INTErNATIoNAL PoLIcy MAKErs - chAPTEr 4: PAGE 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!