The Mass-Luminosity Relation For Galaxies in the Deep Lens Survey
The Mass-Luminosity Relation For Galaxies in the Deep Lens Survey
The Mass-Luminosity Relation For Galaxies in the Deep Lens Survey
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Mass</strong>-<strong>Lum<strong>in</strong>osity</strong> <strong>Relation</strong><br />
<strong>For</strong> <strong>Galaxies</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
Ami Choi (UC Davis)<br />
CINC 2010 @ LBL<br />
October 22, 2010<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Deep</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> <strong>Survey</strong><br />
Collaborators: J.A. Tyson, I.P. Dell'Antonio, M.J. Jee, S.J. Schmidt, D.M. Wittman
Characterize <strong>the</strong> galaxy-dark matter<br />
connection<br />
by <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g, e.g., <strong>the</strong> M tot - L relation us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
lens<strong>in</strong>g to measure <strong>the</strong> total mass.<br />
Observational results have studied low redshift galaxies or <strong>the</strong> most<br />
massive galaxies at higher redshifts, but we can now extend <strong>the</strong> mass<br />
and redshift ranges with current deep and wide surveys.<br />
● Galaxy-galaxy weak lens<strong>in</strong>g (GGWL) background<br />
● Overview of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Deep</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLS)<br />
● GGWL signal b<strong>in</strong>ned by color and lum<strong>in</strong>osity<br />
● M tot - L relation<br />
● Summary and future outlook<br />
2
Galaxy-galaxy weak gravitational lens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
projected mass density<br />
shear<br />
3
Galaxy-galaxy weak gravitational lens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
projected mass density<br />
shear<br />
How do I measure <strong>the</strong> shear for a given<br />
source galaxy?<br />
e observed =e <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic T<br />
4
Galaxy-galaxy weak gravitational lens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
projected mass density<br />
shear<br />
<strong>Lens</strong><strong>in</strong>g assumes <strong>the</strong> distribution of<br />
<strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic ellipticities is zero on average.<br />
〈e observed 〉=〈e <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic 〉〈 T 〉<br />
〈e observed 〉=〈 T 〉<br />
0<br />
5
<strong>Deep</strong> <strong>Lens</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> (DLS)<br />
BVRz' imag<strong>in</strong>g of 20 sq. deg.<br />
over five fields at Kitt Peak and<br />
Cerro Tololo 4m + Mosaic<br />
(Wittman et al. 2002)<br />
● see<strong>in</strong>g 0.9 <strong>in</strong> R<br />
● 18000s <strong>in</strong> R, 12000s <strong>in</strong> Bvz'<br />
● calibration us<strong>in</strong>g Übercal method<br />
(Padmanabhan et al. 2008)<br />
● shapes:<br />
PSF-convolved elliptical Gaussians us<strong>in</strong>g<br />
PCA to describe <strong>the</strong> PSF (Bernste<strong>in</strong> &<br />
Jarvis 2002; Jee et al. 2007)<br />
● photometric redshifts (photo-zs):<br />
measured us<strong>in</strong>g BPZ ( Benitez 2000)<br />
- Comparison of 1000 spec-zs from SHELS<br />
(Geller et al. 2005) gives σ ~ 0.036<br />
6
<strong>For</strong>thcom<strong>in</strong>g data release to appear at<br />
http://dls.physics.ucdavis.edu<br />
7
GGL Signal: Scal<strong>in</strong>g with Color<br />
8
GGL Signal: Scal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>Lum<strong>in</strong>osity</strong><br />
9
<strong>Mass</strong>-<strong>Lum<strong>in</strong>osity</strong><br />
M = M fid (L/(10 10 h -2 L ʘ )) α<br />
M fid = 6.4±2.0 (10 11 h -1 M ʘ )<br />
α = 1.1±0.4<br />
M fid = 7.5 +1.2<br />
-1.1 (1011 h -1 M ʘ )<br />
α = 1.6±0.2<br />
10
Summary<br />
● GGL signal scales with lum<strong>in</strong>osity and color<br />
● <strong>Mass</strong> scales with lum<strong>in</strong>osity <strong>in</strong> agreement with previous<br />
studies<br />
● Calibrated GGL signal for 20 sq. deg. (Choi et al., <strong>in</strong> prep)<br />
● Explore GGL with type, stellar mass, and redshift with <strong>the</strong><br />
end goal of M * -M tot as a function of cosmological time<br />
● Halo model-fitt<strong>in</strong>g – what's happen<strong>in</strong>g at large radii?<br />
● Halo shapes<br />
Ongo<strong>in</strong>g/Future Work<br />
11