american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
80 AMERICAN POLITICAL POETRY<br />
dichotomy, but it is useful to differentiate between poems that aspire<br />
to general <strong>political</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight and ones that comment on specific<br />
contexts.<br />
For both types of equivocal agency, <strong>the</strong> speaker is usually removed<br />
from <strong>the</strong> limitations of personal experience and <strong>the</strong> conventions that<br />
implicitly govern poems of memory, witness, and <strong>in</strong>teriority. Unlike<br />
<strong>political</strong> poems of personal experience, <strong>the</strong>se poems often employ<br />
what Jane Frazier and Charles Molesworth call “disembodied” narrators.<br />
In an essay on W.S. Merw<strong>in</strong>, Frazier writes that “Merw<strong>in</strong>’s narrators<br />
betray little or no personal identity and often seem as if <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
voices speak<strong>in</strong>g free of <strong>the</strong> body” (341). Although <strong>the</strong> rhetorical<br />
effects of Merw<strong>in</strong>’s strategy differ from those of <strong>the</strong> poems <strong>in</strong> this<br />
chapter—Frazier suggests Merw<strong>in</strong>’s narrators ev<strong>in</strong>ce a desire “to jo<strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> self with <strong>the</strong> universal” (342)—<strong>the</strong> concept of <strong>the</strong> disembodied<br />
narrator illum<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>the</strong> ways that poems of equivocal agency move<br />
away from <strong>the</strong> readily identifiable, prom<strong>in</strong>ent, <strong>in</strong>volved, fully embodied,<br />
and mostly first-person narrators <strong>in</strong> poems of experiential agency.<br />
Poems of equivocal agency move away from <strong>the</strong> realistic narrative<br />
impulse that forms much of—though not all of—<strong>the</strong> shape and logic<br />
of experiential agency.<br />
In addition to a move away from <strong>the</strong> narratives of first-person experience<br />
by an identifiable speaker, poems of equivocal agency also move<br />
away from <strong>the</strong> readily recognizable world. Robert P<strong>in</strong>sky suggests that<br />
such a move might be part of <strong>the</strong> poet’s “responsibility,” to re-present<br />
<strong>the</strong> world from a unique angle, one that does not square with simplistic<br />
views propagated <strong>in</strong> various media and widely accepted as accurate<br />
and unimpeachable. P<strong>in</strong>sky claims that “before an artist can see a<br />
subject” she must first “transform it” <strong>in</strong> order to “answer <strong>the</strong> received<br />
cultural imag<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> subject with someth<strong>in</strong>g utterly different.”<br />
P<strong>in</strong>sky believes that transformation “comes before everyth<strong>in</strong>g else” <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g process (“Responsibilities” 9). It is debatable whe<strong>the</strong>r or<br />
not this step is first; however, utterly transform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> referential<br />
world is a key rhetorical strategy <strong>in</strong> poems of equivocal agency as well<br />
as a key element of <strong>poetry</strong> as countercultural discourse.<br />
Poems of equivocal agency can be seen as part of a larger movement<br />
<strong>in</strong> scholarship and literature s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 1960s. “Transform<strong>in</strong>g” traditional<br />
referential history and “<strong>the</strong> received cultural imag<strong>in</strong>ation”<br />
became imperative for many writers beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1960s. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong><br />
decade that saw <strong>the</strong> assass<strong>in</strong>ations of <strong>the</strong> Kennedys, Mart<strong>in</strong> Lu<strong>the</strong>r<br />
K<strong>in</strong>g, Jr., and Malcolm X, many postmodern fiction writers and poststructural<br />
<strong>the</strong>orists have scrut<strong>in</strong>ized <strong>the</strong> validity of previously unquestioned<br />
historical accounts and <strong>the</strong> role of language <strong>in</strong> not only