05.06.2013 Views

american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang

american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang

american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 AMERICAN POLITICAL POETRY<br />

actions <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r agents.” This def<strong>in</strong>ition is appropriate <strong>in</strong> a study of<br />

<strong>political</strong> <strong>poetry</strong> “even though <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ds of assent evoked have no overt,<br />

practical outcome” (41, 50). Mutlu Konuk Blas<strong>in</strong>g fur<strong>the</strong>r erodes a<br />

strict divide between private <strong>poetry</strong> and public speech when she argues<br />

that poetic rhetoric is at once figuration and persuasion, which allows<br />

<strong>the</strong> critic to negotiate <strong>poetry</strong>’s uneasy relationship between <strong>in</strong>direction<br />

and direct <strong>political</strong> message. She appears to agree with Gibbons, who<br />

says that <strong>political</strong> rhetoric values persuasion, whereas <strong>poetry</strong> values<br />

perception and <strong>in</strong>sight. Blas<strong>in</strong>g writes, “<strong>poetry</strong>’s public function is to<br />

grant a perspective on how all mean<strong>in</strong>gs are rhetorical and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

<strong>political</strong>” (21–22). Both suggest that <strong>poetry</strong>’s role is to strip away<br />

surface veneer <strong>in</strong> order to create new perspectives, mean<strong>in</strong>gs that are<br />

present but must be unveiled through <strong>poetry</strong>—“<strong>the</strong> sight of what is<br />

visible” and “<strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g of what is hidden” (Gibbons 294).<br />

Political <strong>poetry</strong>, <strong>the</strong>n, appears to have as its charge <strong>the</strong> role of revelation.<br />

Yet if lyric <strong>poetry</strong> is always <strong>in</strong>direct, must it also obscure what it<br />

reveals? I implicitly explore this question <strong>in</strong> chapter 2 when I discuss<br />

poems that are often <strong>in</strong>direct and equivocal.<br />

Ways of Talk<strong>in</strong>g about<br />

Political Poetry<br />

In addition to understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> roles of <strong>poetry</strong> <strong>in</strong> society and <strong>the</strong><br />

public responsibilities of poets, a book about <strong>political</strong> <strong>poetry</strong> should<br />

<strong>in</strong>terrogate <strong>the</strong> array of signifiers, term<strong>in</strong>ology, and confusion for<br />

what counts as “<strong>political</strong>” <strong>poetry</strong>. Some readers may wonder, as did<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlocutors I mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preface, how exactly to identify a<br />

<strong>political</strong> poem. What should be considered <strong>political</strong> <strong>poetry</strong>? What<br />

shapes do <strong>political</strong> poems take? What k<strong>in</strong>ds of <strong>political</strong> work do <strong>the</strong>y<br />

attempt? What k<strong>in</strong>ds of voices? What k<strong>in</strong>ds of speakers? I beg<strong>in</strong> with a<br />

simple but expansive def<strong>in</strong>ition, a “broader view” of politics, put forth<br />

by Michael Parenti:<br />

Politics is more than just someth<strong>in</strong>g politicians do. It is <strong>the</strong> process of<br />

struggle over conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests carried <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> public arena. It also<br />

<strong>in</strong>volves mut<strong>in</strong>g and suppress<strong>in</strong>g conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests. Politics <strong>in</strong>volves<br />

not only <strong>the</strong> competition among groups with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> system but <strong>the</strong><br />

struggle to change <strong>the</strong> system itself, not only <strong>the</strong> desire to achieve<br />

predef<strong>in</strong>ed ends but <strong>the</strong> struggle to redef<strong>in</strong>e ends and pose alternatives<br />

to <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g politico-economic structure. (3)<br />

Draw<strong>in</strong>g from Parenti’s view of politics, my def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>political</strong><br />

poems is <strong>in</strong>clusive and far-rang<strong>in</strong>g. For me, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e between what is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!