american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10 AMERICAN POLITICAL POETRY<br />
actions <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r agents.” This def<strong>in</strong>ition is appropriate <strong>in</strong> a study of<br />
<strong>political</strong> <strong>poetry</strong> “even though <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>ds of assent evoked have no overt,<br />
practical outcome” (41, 50). Mutlu Konuk Blas<strong>in</strong>g fur<strong>the</strong>r erodes a<br />
strict divide between private <strong>poetry</strong> and public speech when she argues<br />
that poetic rhetoric is at once figuration and persuasion, which allows<br />
<strong>the</strong> critic to negotiate <strong>poetry</strong>’s uneasy relationship between <strong>in</strong>direction<br />
and direct <strong>political</strong> message. She appears to agree with Gibbons, who<br />
says that <strong>political</strong> rhetoric values persuasion, whereas <strong>poetry</strong> values<br />
perception and <strong>in</strong>sight. Blas<strong>in</strong>g writes, “<strong>poetry</strong>’s public function is to<br />
grant a perspective on how all mean<strong>in</strong>gs are rhetorical and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
<strong>political</strong>” (21–22). Both suggest that <strong>poetry</strong>’s role is to strip away<br />
surface veneer <strong>in</strong> order to create new perspectives, mean<strong>in</strong>gs that are<br />
present but must be unveiled through <strong>poetry</strong>—“<strong>the</strong> sight of what is<br />
visible” and “<strong>the</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g of what is hidden” (Gibbons 294).<br />
Political <strong>poetry</strong>, <strong>the</strong>n, appears to have as its charge <strong>the</strong> role of revelation.<br />
Yet if lyric <strong>poetry</strong> is always <strong>in</strong>direct, must it also obscure what it<br />
reveals? I implicitly explore this question <strong>in</strong> chapter 2 when I discuss<br />
poems that are often <strong>in</strong>direct and equivocal.<br />
Ways of Talk<strong>in</strong>g about<br />
Political Poetry<br />
In addition to understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> roles of <strong>poetry</strong> <strong>in</strong> society and <strong>the</strong><br />
public responsibilities of poets, a book about <strong>political</strong> <strong>poetry</strong> should<br />
<strong>in</strong>terrogate <strong>the</strong> array of signifiers, term<strong>in</strong>ology, and confusion for<br />
what counts as “<strong>political</strong>” <strong>poetry</strong>. Some readers may wonder, as did<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlocutors I mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preface, how exactly to identify a<br />
<strong>political</strong> poem. What should be considered <strong>political</strong> <strong>poetry</strong>? What<br />
shapes do <strong>political</strong> poems take? What k<strong>in</strong>ds of <strong>political</strong> work do <strong>the</strong>y<br />
attempt? What k<strong>in</strong>ds of voices? What k<strong>in</strong>ds of speakers? I beg<strong>in</strong> with a<br />
simple but expansive def<strong>in</strong>ition, a “broader view” of politics, put forth<br />
by Michael Parenti:<br />
Politics is more than just someth<strong>in</strong>g politicians do. It is <strong>the</strong> process of<br />
struggle over conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests carried <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> public arena. It also<br />
<strong>in</strong>volves mut<strong>in</strong>g and suppress<strong>in</strong>g conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests. Politics <strong>in</strong>volves<br />
not only <strong>the</strong> competition among groups with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> system but <strong>the</strong><br />
struggle to change <strong>the</strong> system itself, not only <strong>the</strong> desire to achieve<br />
predef<strong>in</strong>ed ends but <strong>the</strong> struggle to redef<strong>in</strong>e ends and pose alternatives<br />
to <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g politico-economic structure. (3)<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g from Parenti’s view of politics, my def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>political</strong><br />
poems is <strong>in</strong>clusive and far-rang<strong>in</strong>g. For me, <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e between what is