american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 AMERICAN POLITICAL POETRY<br />
Workers Union used Shelley’s “Mask of Anarchy” as a rally<strong>in</strong>g cry<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g strikes <strong>in</strong> New York at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> twentieth <strong>century</strong><br />
(326). 6 In his analysis of a Cardenal poem <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> speaker names<br />
Nicaragua’s dictator, Gibbons claims that a substitution of a different<br />
tyrannical <strong>political</strong> or historical figure known by an audience as a violent<br />
dictator will not change <strong>the</strong> poem’s mean<strong>in</strong>g, “only its focus”<br />
(282–283), just as <strong>the</strong> focus of Shelley’s poem changed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decades<br />
after its writ<strong>in</strong>g. The recent revival of Shakespeare’s The Tempest and<br />
Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre as postcolonial texts can be understood<br />
through a similar lens.<br />
Although <strong>the</strong>re have been many arguments that <strong>the</strong> role and<br />
cultural esteem of poets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 1960s has<br />
changed greatly (mostly for <strong>the</strong> worse, critics and observers claim), <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> aftermath of 9/11 and <strong>the</strong> events that have followed such as <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>cursions <strong>in</strong>to Afghanistan and Iraq, <strong>the</strong> role of poets has rek<strong>in</strong>dled<br />
some of <strong>the</strong> public spirit of 1960s poets. The evidence is circumstantial<br />
but prodigious: Galway K<strong>in</strong>nell’s “When <strong>the</strong> Towers Fell,” which<br />
first appeared <strong>in</strong> The New Yorker a year after <strong>the</strong> attacks; Amiri<br />
Baraka’s confrontational “Somebody Blew Up America,” which<br />
<strong>in</strong>cited a flurry of anti-Semitic accusations; performance poet Saul<br />
Williams’s project aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> war <strong>in</strong> Afghanistan called Not <strong>in</strong> My<br />
Name; Sam Hamill’s project Poets aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> War; <strong>the</strong> cancelled<br />
<strong>poetry</strong>-month celebration to be hosted by Laura Bush at <strong>the</strong> White<br />
House; and <strong>the</strong> speak<strong>in</strong>g appearances of poets at rallies across<br />
<strong>the</strong> country, such as Robert Hass <strong>in</strong> Berkeley <strong>in</strong> September 2001.<br />
These examples <strong>in</strong>dicate a greater public role for poets when dramatic<br />
events imp<strong>in</strong>ge on everyday liv<strong>in</strong>g. Why do we turn to poets such as<br />
Hass, a former U.S. Poet Laureate (1993–1995) better known—if<br />
somewhat <strong>in</strong>accurately—for poems of <strong>in</strong>trospection than <strong>political</strong><br />
poems, when we are faced with uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty? Poets, we still seem to<br />
believe, can access truth by stripp<strong>in</strong>g back superficial appearances for<br />
deeper mean<strong>in</strong>gs and by giv<strong>in</strong>g revelatory <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to public issues <strong>in</strong><br />
ways that politicians and journalists cannot.<br />
Gibbons <strong>in</strong>directly po<strong>in</strong>ts out one of <strong>the</strong> potential consequences of<br />
poets be<strong>in</strong>g charged with comment<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>political</strong> and social issues.<br />
He discusses Cardenal’s self-imposed requirement that his staunchly<br />
<strong>political</strong> <strong>poetry</strong> refer to a tangible world outside <strong>the</strong> poem. Such an<br />
approach skirts <strong>the</strong> possibility of pull<strong>in</strong>g poetic creation <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />
doma<strong>in</strong> of referentiality and away from <strong>the</strong> imag<strong>in</strong>ation. Leonard M.<br />
Scigaj po<strong>in</strong>ts out a similar problematic <strong>in</strong> his monograph on American<br />
“eco<strong>poetry</strong>” (poems by A.R. Ammons, Wendell Berry, W.S. Merw<strong>in</strong>,<br />
and Gary Snyder) when he conjectures that environmental <strong>poetry</strong> has