american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
106 AMERICAN POLITICAL POETRY<br />
emotionally resonant and familial but also more abstract. So while <strong>the</strong><br />
lion grows “out of buried aunties” and “Mo<strong>the</strong>rs harden<strong>in</strong>g like<br />
pounded stumps,” it also grows “out of <strong>the</strong> bones’ need to sharpen<br />
and <strong>the</strong> muscles’ to stretch.” The use of “aunties” is particularly<br />
resonant as it suggest centuries of African American domestic servitude<br />
and oppression. The latter two l<strong>in</strong>es are images of be<strong>in</strong>g taxed to<br />
physical extremity and <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g need to respond to that<br />
extremity with focused physical strength.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> same time though, <strong>the</strong> symbols of poverty are still present.<br />
“Industrial barns,” “bus ride,” and “gutted cars” mix with disconcert<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
abstract images such as “<strong>the</strong> sweet k<strong>in</strong>ks of <strong>the</strong> fist” and “<strong>the</strong><br />
thorax of caves.” The result is a ghostly lion, ris<strong>in</strong>g both out of<br />
mysterious, visionary images resonant with emotional turmoil and <strong>the</strong><br />
very real materials of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner-city. In a review of They Feed They Lion,<br />
Alan Helms claims that <strong>the</strong> title poem “ignores <strong>the</strong> ‘edges’ of syntax,<br />
logical relation, propositional sense.” For Helms, moreover, much of<br />
<strong>the</strong> poem’s imagery does not “make ‘sense,’ ” but “that’s one of <strong>the</strong><br />
po<strong>in</strong>ts of <strong>the</strong> poem” (153). Though much of <strong>the</strong> poem may not make<br />
sense from a purely realistic, representational viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>the</strong> collection<br />
of images make “sense” on a gut emotional, adrenal<strong>in</strong>e-fueled level.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, from a ma<strong>in</strong>stream media standpo<strong>in</strong>t, riots do not make<br />
“sense” ei<strong>the</strong>r—<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir view, riots are self-destructive and pathological.<br />
Lev<strong>in</strong>e’s poem powerfully suggests that riots come “out of” <strong>the</strong><br />
everyday, mundane realities of bus rides, burlap sacks, and black beans<br />
and “out of ” some abstract, dynamic repository of rage—“From <strong>the</strong>y<br />
sack and <strong>the</strong>y belly opened.” There<strong>in</strong> lies <strong>the</strong> brilliance of “They Feed<br />
They Lion.” There is no way to get at <strong>the</strong> raw emotion Lev<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>in</strong>terested<br />
<strong>in</strong> without mix<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>explicable genesis of pure anger with<br />
<strong>the</strong> raw materials that both embody and create that anger. In this way,<br />
<strong>the</strong> rage is similar to <strong>the</strong> anger <strong>in</strong> some hip-hop music with its emphasis<br />
on metaphor, hyperbole, and <strong>the</strong> raw materials of poverty.<br />
Along with its sense of communal rage, <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>strumental aspect<br />
of “They Feed They Lion” is its portrayal of collective agency. The lion<br />
is <strong>the</strong> communal agent—it embodies all of <strong>the</strong> power and anger of<br />
Detroit’s African American community, and all of <strong>the</strong> community’s<br />
energies coalesce <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle figure of <strong>the</strong> lion. “They Lion” is thus <strong>the</strong><br />
agent that enables this community to move “from ‘Bow Down’ ” to<br />
“ ‘Rise Up.’ ” Even though <strong>the</strong> speaker—outsider and (symbolic)<br />
oppressor—“has imag<strong>in</strong>atively embraced ‘They,’ and done it <strong>in</strong> defiant<br />
black English grammatical constructions” (Marchant 305), he is still an<br />
outsider. He is <strong>the</strong> symbolic character that <strong>the</strong> lion acts aga<strong>in</strong>st. This<br />
outside speaker is consumed as “<strong>the</strong>y feed” on him. As Marchant po<strong>in</strong>ts