american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EQUIVOCAL AGENCY 101<br />
This move is possible only with a calm, detached voice that does<br />
not “exude rage” but an irrational rationality depraved <strong>in</strong> its<br />
demeanor as well as <strong>in</strong> its desire. Bly’s use of <strong>the</strong> “Smart-Blake-<br />
Whitman” l<strong>in</strong>e, even for all its monotony, is perfect for such a venture.<br />
As Bly says, this l<strong>in</strong>e is given to “declaration ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>quiry” and<br />
to “rhetoric ra<strong>the</strong>r than exchange of feel<strong>in</strong>gs” (Selected Poems 197). In<br />
“Count<strong>in</strong>g Small-Boned Bodies” <strong>the</strong> speaker declares his desire, but<br />
ev<strong>in</strong>ces no feel<strong>in</strong>gs that buttress it. This empty rhetorical voice echoes<br />
<strong>the</strong> horrify<strong>in</strong>g, detached language of daily kill counts dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> late<br />
1960s. In this poem, <strong>the</strong>n, equivocal agency’s dystopian voice is a<br />
counterpo<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>the</strong> utopian one present <strong>in</strong> Walcott’s poem.<br />
Whereas “Count<strong>in</strong>g Small-Boned Bodies” is perhaps <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>est of<br />
Bly’s Vietnam-era <strong>political</strong> poems—not least because it is concise,<br />
restra<strong>in</strong>ed, clever, and because its voice is a parodic absurdity, unlike<br />
some of his longer meditations on <strong>the</strong> effects of Vietnam on<br />
<strong>the</strong> American psyche—“The Asians Dy<strong>in</strong>g” is <strong>the</strong> most noticeably<br />
<strong>political</strong> poem <strong>in</strong> Merw<strong>in</strong>’s brilliant The Lice (1967). In poems devoid<br />
of punctuation and marked by disconnected, surreal images, ambiguous<br />
syntax, elusive meditative phras<strong>in</strong>g, and an abid<strong>in</strong>g sense of<br />
absence and death, Merw<strong>in</strong> considers <strong>the</strong> aspects of experience and<br />
consciousness that defy narrative expression. The <strong>political</strong> poems <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> volume move more by haunt<strong>in</strong>g strangeness than by specific ideological<br />
platform. Each poem can be seen paradoxically as both a selfconta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
unit as <strong>the</strong>re are no smaller syntactical units with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
poem—no sentences and few unequivocal phrases—and as an experience<br />
that cannot be expressed effectively <strong>in</strong> language. These poems<br />
portray <strong>the</strong> world as better understood as a mysterious place than as a<br />
rational, logical one governed by scientific and human laws.<br />
“The Asians Dy<strong>in</strong>g” is thus a model example of particular equivocal<br />
agency. There is no readily identifiable, realistic speaker. There is no<br />
punctuation to help <strong>the</strong> reader sort out <strong>the</strong> haunt<strong>in</strong>g, surreal images or<br />
to sequence <strong>the</strong>m logically. The only quasi-human agents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem<br />
are odd abstractions from decay and absence, without breath, color, or<br />
immanence. The four primary movers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem, <strong>the</strong> ones that act or<br />
are acted upon, are symbolic images: “The ash <strong>the</strong> great walker”; “<strong>the</strong><br />
possessors”; “<strong>the</strong> ghosts of <strong>the</strong> villages”; and “<strong>the</strong> open eyes of<br />
<strong>the</strong> dead” (118–119). However, <strong>the</strong> reader knows that <strong>the</strong> poem refers<br />
to <strong>the</strong> atrocities of <strong>the</strong> Vietnam War because <strong>the</strong> title demands this<br />
<strong>in</strong>terpretation. However, Merw<strong>in</strong>’s aes<strong>the</strong>tics are not given to overt<br />
<strong>political</strong> statements or representations of <strong>the</strong> “real” world. Instead of<br />
speak<strong>in</strong>g of empire, soldiers, or <strong>the</strong> Pentagon, he creates visionary<br />
personifications that make U.S. actions <strong>in</strong> Vietnam more omnipresent