05.06.2013 Views

american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang

american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang

american political poetry in the 21st century - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EQUIVOCAL AGENCY 101<br />

This move is possible only with a calm, detached voice that does<br />

not “exude rage” but an irrational rationality depraved <strong>in</strong> its<br />

demeanor as well as <strong>in</strong> its desire. Bly’s use of <strong>the</strong> “Smart-Blake-<br />

Whitman” l<strong>in</strong>e, even for all its monotony, is perfect for such a venture.<br />

As Bly says, this l<strong>in</strong>e is given to “declaration ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>quiry” and<br />

to “rhetoric ra<strong>the</strong>r than exchange of feel<strong>in</strong>gs” (Selected Poems 197). In<br />

“Count<strong>in</strong>g Small-Boned Bodies” <strong>the</strong> speaker declares his desire, but<br />

ev<strong>in</strong>ces no feel<strong>in</strong>gs that buttress it. This empty rhetorical voice echoes<br />

<strong>the</strong> horrify<strong>in</strong>g, detached language of daily kill counts dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> late<br />

1960s. In this poem, <strong>the</strong>n, equivocal agency’s dystopian voice is a<br />

counterpo<strong>in</strong>t to <strong>the</strong> utopian one present <strong>in</strong> Walcott’s poem.<br />

Whereas “Count<strong>in</strong>g Small-Boned Bodies” is perhaps <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>est of<br />

Bly’s Vietnam-era <strong>political</strong> poems—not least because it is concise,<br />

restra<strong>in</strong>ed, clever, and because its voice is a parodic absurdity, unlike<br />

some of his longer meditations on <strong>the</strong> effects of Vietnam on<br />

<strong>the</strong> American psyche—“The Asians Dy<strong>in</strong>g” is <strong>the</strong> most noticeably<br />

<strong>political</strong> poem <strong>in</strong> Merw<strong>in</strong>’s brilliant The Lice (1967). In poems devoid<br />

of punctuation and marked by disconnected, surreal images, ambiguous<br />

syntax, elusive meditative phras<strong>in</strong>g, and an abid<strong>in</strong>g sense of<br />

absence and death, Merw<strong>in</strong> considers <strong>the</strong> aspects of experience and<br />

consciousness that defy narrative expression. The <strong>political</strong> poems <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> volume move more by haunt<strong>in</strong>g strangeness than by specific ideological<br />

platform. Each poem can be seen paradoxically as both a selfconta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

unit as <strong>the</strong>re are no smaller syntactical units with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

poem—no sentences and few unequivocal phrases—and as an experience<br />

that cannot be expressed effectively <strong>in</strong> language. These poems<br />

portray <strong>the</strong> world as better understood as a mysterious place than as a<br />

rational, logical one governed by scientific and human laws.<br />

“The Asians Dy<strong>in</strong>g” is thus a model example of particular equivocal<br />

agency. There is no readily identifiable, realistic speaker. There is no<br />

punctuation to help <strong>the</strong> reader sort out <strong>the</strong> haunt<strong>in</strong>g, surreal images or<br />

to sequence <strong>the</strong>m logically. The only quasi-human agents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem<br />

are odd abstractions from decay and absence, without breath, color, or<br />

immanence. The four primary movers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> poem, <strong>the</strong> ones that act or<br />

are acted upon, are symbolic images: “The ash <strong>the</strong> great walker”; “<strong>the</strong><br />

possessors”; “<strong>the</strong> ghosts of <strong>the</strong> villages”; and “<strong>the</strong> open eyes of<br />

<strong>the</strong> dead” (118–119). However, <strong>the</strong> reader knows that <strong>the</strong> poem refers<br />

to <strong>the</strong> atrocities of <strong>the</strong> Vietnam War because <strong>the</strong> title demands this<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation. However, Merw<strong>in</strong>’s aes<strong>the</strong>tics are not given to overt<br />

<strong>political</strong> statements or representations of <strong>the</strong> “real” world. Instead of<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g of empire, soldiers, or <strong>the</strong> Pentagon, he creates visionary<br />

personifications that make U.S. actions <strong>in</strong> Vietnam more omnipresent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!