05.06.2013 Views

EU industrial structure - EU Bookshop - Europa

EU industrial structure - EU Bookshop - Europa

EU industrial structure - EU Bookshop - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For countries as a whole, it should be noted that, in<br />

principle, specialization is not necessarily a good or<br />

bad thing per se. On one hand, specialization may<br />

reflect a natural focus on what the country does better<br />

relative to trade partners (comparative advantage), and<br />

hence a gain of overall productivity. On the other hand,<br />

diversification will always render a society more resilient<br />

to external shocks; a downturn in a specific sector can be<br />

compensated by other sectors still doing well and feeding<br />

public finances that eventually help cushion the negative<br />

impact of the shock (e.g., paying unemployment insurance).<br />

Nevertheless, diversification can also be seen as reflecting<br />

a society with a wider choice for its citizens; a high degree<br />

of diversification is very likely reflecting a strong and<br />

diverse human capital base that makes it possible to have<br />

from artists to engineers producing from haut couture<br />

to satellites. Given that by nature larger countries tend to<br />

be more diversified, countries below the line in figure II.6<br />

can be seen as reaping the benefits from having a more<br />

diversified economy than the average country given its size.<br />

In that reading, Belgium is a highly diversified country for<br />

its size whereas Italy, despite its large size, is less diversified<br />

and, in principle, more vulnerable to sectoral shocks or<br />

to competition from emerging economies due to high<br />

specialisation in low skill industries such as textiles and<br />

leather products.<br />

box II.2: Labour skills taxonomy<br />

Chapter II — Changes in <strong>EU</strong> Industrial <strong>structure</strong><br />

The taxonomy of labour skills is presented and discussed in Chapter II of O’Mahony and van Ark (2003),<br />

<strong>EU</strong> productivity and competitiveness — An industry perspective, European Commission. A measure of educational<br />

attainment is the metric that has been used to reflect skill intensity. The sectors from the NACE Rev1. classification<br />

were broken down in the following way:<br />

II.2 Skill and technology<br />

specialization<br />

The sectors analysed are classified according to the statistical<br />

nomenclature (NACE Rev. 2) presenting data on economic<br />

activities. It is sometimes useful to use other ways to classify<br />

sectors according to economic and technological criteria.<br />

Such classification can be used to illustrate similarities<br />

and differences between countries and sectors. Industry<br />

taxonomies are used for this purpose to group industries<br />

that have common characteristics. Once the taxonomies<br />

are applied to <strong>EU</strong> member states, it is possible to compare<br />

patterns across countries. The focus below is on two different<br />

taxonomies: one on skills and one on technology. It is not<br />

only the quantity of these inputs that matters for sectoral<br />

performance but also their qualities. As in the previous<br />

section, two different types of indicators are available:<br />

a breakdown by value added share and specialisation.<br />

ii21 changes in skills’ specialization<br />

The types of education and training that contribute to<br />

making a sector competitive can be very sector‑specific.<br />

Similarly, different levels of skills are needed across sectors.<br />

The measure of skill intensity, represented by the levels34 of education attainment that dominate in a sector, reflects<br />

this heterogeneity. The sectors in which people reached<br />

a similar level of educational attainment are classified<br />

according to different levels of skills. This led to four<br />

different categories, cf. Box II.2.<br />

low skill: A Agriculture, hunting and forestry, B Fishing, C Mining and quarrying, DA15 Manufacture of food<br />

products and beverages, DA16 Manufacture of tobacco products, DB Manufacture of textiles and textile products,<br />

DC Manufacture of leather and leather products, DH Manufacture of rubber and plastic products, DI Manufacture<br />

of other non‑metallic mineral products, DJ27 Manufacture of basic metals, DM34 Manufacture of motor vehicles,<br />

trailers and semi‑trailers, DN36 Manufacture of furniture; manufacturing n.e.c., DN37 Recycling, H Hotels and<br />

restaurants, O Other community, social, personal service activities.<br />

34 A common measure is the one provided by International<br />

Standard classification ISCED. The classification can be found on:<br />

http://www.uis.unesco.org/Pages/default.aspx<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!