GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government

GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government

04.06.2013 Views

possible, and to classify the substance in question as moderate(corresponding to PII3-5)or severe(corresponding to PII 6-8). Also, it is preferable to determine the corresponding category at least upon confirming which classification criteria the given existing classification is based on since substances classified as “moderate” based on different classification criteria may cause different degrees of skin reaction. Category 1 is applied to substances that cause irreversible lesions such as necrosis within observation period of Skin Corrosion/Irritation test. There is an opinion to the effect that a substance evaluated as “severe” corresponds to Category 2 if no irreversible lesion is observed. This judgment, however, may be subjective and should be considered only for reference. It is preferable for GHS classification to refer to the original literatures, to examine the validity of data, and to perform classification based on scientific evidence and methods of GHS. Findings of test reports GHS Category (*)("Not classified in JIS Classification) Substances considered as strong acids(pH≤2) or strong alkalis (pH≥11.5)based on their physicochemical properties shall be classified as Category 1. However, in this case, as described in the UN GHS the second revised edition, it must be shown that its buffer power maintains pH on exposure. In classification, buffering capacity of acids and bases should be taken into account. (4)Guidance for classification and judgment A) Background of this item and points to be noted Corrosive Severe Moderate Mild +irreversible effects Skin Corrosion/Irritation 1(1A,1B,1C) 2 3 (*) Regarding background of this item, refer to Part 1, Introduction. 118

As for skin corrosion, classification should be conducted according to the workflow of decision logic 3.2.1, which is the definite decision criteria of UN GHS the second revised edition. In classification, refer to the technical advices such as judging method based on pre-existing test data described below. Sub-categorization of Corrosion can be performed only when an animal test is conducted that has exposure time and observation period which allow application of the judgment of corrosion in the UN GHS second revised edition (3.2.1). Accordingly, only for such cases, sub-categorization is performed, and for other cases, sub-categorization should not be performed. In addition, note the following in classification. * Unless a description that definitely denies hazards or recognizes extremely low hazards is available in List 1, determination of "Not classified" should be performed carefully. If there is any question, not “Not classified” but “Classification not possible” is preferable, which is based on the absence of sufficient information for judging,. * When sub-categorization is not possible, the substance shall be classified as “Category 1”. B)Judgement by reliable existing revelation course When a substance has cases to be judged as corrosion (any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and 1C, or Category 1) or irritation (Category 2) in human or animal results, the substance shall be classified as such. (Example: accidental cases) C) Judgement by existing test data 1) Decision by in vivo test result: ■ Corrosion:(any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and 1C, or Category 1) In at least 1 of 3 tested animals after exposure for up to 4 hours: a) Necrosis into the dermis. b) Ulcer, bleeding, or bloody scabs in the applied area. c) Blanching of the skin, complete areas of alopecia, and remaining scars are found at the end of the observation period of 14 days. d) In the case of erythema/eschar or edema score of 4 or more, the substance is determined as Corrosion (Category 1)(When, however, no irreversible lesion is found, the substance is determined as Irritation (Category 2)). ■ Irritation (Category 2) At 24, 48, and 72 hours after application: a) Mean value of Draize Score (for each animal) (S) is ≥2.3 to ≤4.0 for erythema/eschar or edema in at least 2 of 3 tested animal, b) Inflammation and alopecia of limited area, hyperkeratosis, hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia, 119

As <strong>for</strong> skin corrosion, classification should be conducted according to <strong>the</strong> workflow of<br />

decision logic 3.2.1, which is <strong>the</strong> definite decision criteria of UN <strong>GHS</strong> <strong>the</strong> second revised<br />

edition. In classification, refer to <strong>the</strong> technical advices such as judging method based on<br />

pre-existing test data described below.<br />

Sub-categorization of Corrosion can be per<strong>for</strong>med only when an animal test is conducted that<br />

has exposure time and observation period which allow application of <strong>the</strong> judgment of<br />

corrosion in <strong>the</strong> UN <strong>GHS</strong> second revised edition (3.2.1). Accordingly, only <strong>for</strong> such cases,<br />

sub-categorization is per<strong>for</strong>med, and <strong>for</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cases, sub-categorization should not be<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />

In addition, note <strong>the</strong> following in classification.<br />

* Unless a description that definitely denies hazards or recognizes extremely low hazards is<br />

available in List 1, determination of "Not classified" should be per<strong>for</strong>med carefully. If<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is any question, not “Not classified” but “<strong>Classification</strong> not possible” is preferable,<br />

which is based on <strong>the</strong> absence of sufficient in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> judging,.<br />

* When sub-categorization is not possible, <strong>the</strong> substance shall be classified as “Category 1”.<br />

B)Judgement by reliable existing revelation course<br />

When a substance has cases to be judged as corrosion (any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and<br />

1C, or Category 1) or irritation (Category 2) in human or animal results, <strong>the</strong> substance shall be<br />

classified as such. (Example: accidental cases)<br />

C) Judgement by existing test data<br />

1) Decision by in vivo test result:<br />

■ Corrosion:(any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and 1C, or Category 1)<br />

In at least 1 of 3 tested animals after exposure <strong>for</strong> up to 4 hours:<br />

a) Necrosis into <strong>the</strong> dermis.<br />

b) Ulcer, bleeding, or bloody scabs in <strong>the</strong> applied area.<br />

c) Blanching of <strong>the</strong> skin, complete areas of alopecia, and remaining scars are found at <strong>the</strong><br />

end of <strong>the</strong> observation period of 14 days.<br />

d) In <strong>the</strong> case of ery<strong>the</strong>ma/eschar or edema score of 4 or more, <strong>the</strong> substance is determined<br />

as Corrosion (Category 1)(When, however, no irreversible lesion is found, <strong>the</strong> substance<br />

is determined as Irritation (Category 2)).<br />

■ Irritation (Category 2)<br />

At 24, 48, and 72 hours after application:<br />

a) Mean value of Draize Score (<strong>for</strong> each animal) (S) is ≥2.3 to ≤4.0 <strong>for</strong> ery<strong>the</strong>ma/eschar or<br />

edema in at least 2 of 3 tested animal,<br />

b) Inflammation and alopecia of limited area, hyperkeratosis, hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia,<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!