GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government
possible, and to classify the substance in question as moderate(corresponding to PII3-5)or severe(corresponding to PII 6-8). Also, it is preferable to determine the corresponding category at least upon confirming which classification criteria the given existing classification is based on since substances classified as “moderate” based on different classification criteria may cause different degrees of skin reaction. Category 1 is applied to substances that cause irreversible lesions such as necrosis within observation period of Skin Corrosion/Irritation test. There is an opinion to the effect that a substance evaluated as “severe” corresponds to Category 2 if no irreversible lesion is observed. This judgment, however, may be subjective and should be considered only for reference. It is preferable for GHS classification to refer to the original literatures, to examine the validity of data, and to perform classification based on scientific evidence and methods of GHS. Findings of test reports GHS Category (*)("Not classified in JIS Classification) Substances considered as strong acids(pH≤2) or strong alkalis (pH≥11.5)based on their physicochemical properties shall be classified as Category 1. However, in this case, as described in the UN GHS the second revised edition, it must be shown that its buffer power maintains pH on exposure. In classification, buffering capacity of acids and bases should be taken into account. (4)Guidance for classification and judgment A) Background of this item and points to be noted Corrosive Severe Moderate Mild +irreversible effects Skin Corrosion/Irritation 1(1A,1B,1C) 2 3 (*) Regarding background of this item, refer to Part 1, Introduction. 118
As for skin corrosion, classification should be conducted according to the workflow of decision logic 3.2.1, which is the definite decision criteria of UN GHS the second revised edition. In classification, refer to the technical advices such as judging method based on pre-existing test data described below. Sub-categorization of Corrosion can be performed only when an animal test is conducted that has exposure time and observation period which allow application of the judgment of corrosion in the UN GHS second revised edition (3.2.1). Accordingly, only for such cases, sub-categorization is performed, and for other cases, sub-categorization should not be performed. In addition, note the following in classification. * Unless a description that definitely denies hazards or recognizes extremely low hazards is available in List 1, determination of "Not classified" should be performed carefully. If there is any question, not “Not classified” but “Classification not possible” is preferable, which is based on the absence of sufficient information for judging,. * When sub-categorization is not possible, the substance shall be classified as “Category 1”. B)Judgement by reliable existing revelation course When a substance has cases to be judged as corrosion (any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and 1C, or Category 1) or irritation (Category 2) in human or animal results, the substance shall be classified as such. (Example: accidental cases) C) Judgement by existing test data 1) Decision by in vivo test result: ■ Corrosion:(any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and 1C, or Category 1) In at least 1 of 3 tested animals after exposure for up to 4 hours: a) Necrosis into the dermis. b) Ulcer, bleeding, or bloody scabs in the applied area. c) Blanching of the skin, complete areas of alopecia, and remaining scars are found at the end of the observation period of 14 days. d) In the case of erythema/eschar or edema score of 4 or more, the substance is determined as Corrosion (Category 1)(When, however, no irreversible lesion is found, the substance is determined as Irritation (Category 2)). ■ Irritation (Category 2) At 24, 48, and 72 hours after application: a) Mean value of Draize Score (for each animal) (S) is ≥2.3 to ≤4.0 for erythema/eschar or edema in at least 2 of 3 tested animal, b) Inflammation and alopecia of limited area, hyperkeratosis, hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia, 119
- Page 71 and 72: Table 2.11.1: Criteria for self-hea
- Page 73 and 74: than 30% water of crystallization 1
- Page 75 and 76: transport, the same chemical is to
- Page 77 and 78: 138: Water-reactive substances - em
- Page 79 and 80: orohydrides, alkyl compounds, etc.)
- Page 81 and 82: 2-3-13 Oxidizing Liquids (1)Definit
- Page 83 and 84: 2-1-14 Oxidizing Solids (1)Definiti
- Page 85 and 86: (Example of category 3)2067 AMMONIU
- Page 87 and 88: this class, according to the follow
- Page 89 and 90: The flow chart of 2.15.2.2 is exact
- Page 91 and 92: 2-3-16 Corrosive to Metals (1)Defin
- Page 93: Note: In GHS, it is defined that if
- Page 96 and 97: 1-1) Organization National Institut
- Page 98 and 99: URL http://www.ecetoc.org/publicati
- Page 100 and 101: List 2: Useful information sources
- Page 102 and 103: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgdrt
- Page 104 and 105: 3-1-3 Management of information in
- Page 106 and 107: Relation between concentration(ppm)
- Page 108 and 109: follows: Category 1 (100 ppmV), Cat
- Page 110 and 111: (ii) the appropriate conversion val
- Page 112 and 113: UNRTDG Class 6.1 is not sub-categor
- Page 114 and 115: possible” unless the obvious conc
- Page 116 and 117: whereas the reference value is set
- Page 118 and 119: 3-2-2 Skin Corrosion/Irritation (1)
- Page 120 and 121: Table 3.2.2 Skin irritation categor
- Page 124 and 125: and scaling persist to the end of 1
- Page 126 and 127: 【GHS 2 nd revised edition】 Figu
- Page 128 and 129: [Note for the above figure] (a) Cla
- Page 130 and 131: B) Classification criteria in GHS (
- Page 132 and 133: (4)Guidance for classification and
- Page 134 and 135: G) Strategy of testing and evaluati
- Page 136 and 137: 2c Structure activity Skin corrosiv
- Page 138 and 139: done in parallel. This stage should
- Page 140 and 141: criteria given below:” a) If ther
- Page 142 and 143: [Decision Criteria 1]: In the cases
- Page 144 and 145: substance shall be classified in Ca
- Page 146 and 147: The classification is based on any
- Page 148 and 149: 7) Data from various kinds of tests
- Page 150 and 151: Table 3-8 Test data as the basis of
- Page 152 and 153: Category 1B. Mutagens classified a
- Page 154 and 155: c)Exceptionally, strong positive re
- Page 156 and 157: 3-2-6 Carcinogenicity (1)Definition
- Page 158 and 159: The principles of GHS classificatio
- Page 160 and 161: B) Substance for which GHS classifi
- Page 162 and 163: metabolic system, a cautious invest
- Page 164 and 165: hazard warning for pregnant women a
- Page 166 and 167: OECD414 Prenatal development toxici
- Page 168 and 169: D) Decision logic and classificatio
- Page 170 and 171: e considered to be sufficient. (Sub
As <strong>for</strong> skin corrosion, classification should be conducted according to <strong>the</strong> workflow of<br />
decision logic 3.2.1, which is <strong>the</strong> definite decision criteria of UN <strong>GHS</strong> <strong>the</strong> second revised<br />
edition. In classification, refer to <strong>the</strong> technical advices such as judging method based on<br />
pre-existing test data described below.<br />
Sub-categorization of Corrosion can be per<strong>for</strong>med only when an animal test is conducted that<br />
has exposure time and observation period which allow application of <strong>the</strong> judgment of<br />
corrosion in <strong>the</strong> UN <strong>GHS</strong> second revised edition (3.2.1). Accordingly, only <strong>for</strong> such cases,<br />
sub-categorization is per<strong>for</strong>med, and <strong>for</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cases, sub-categorization should not be<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />
In addition, note <strong>the</strong> following in classification.<br />
* Unless a description that definitely denies hazards or recognizes extremely low hazards is<br />
available in List 1, determination of "Not classified" should be per<strong>for</strong>med carefully. If<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is any question, not “Not classified” but “<strong>Classification</strong> not possible” is preferable,<br />
which is based on <strong>the</strong> absence of sufficient in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> judging,.<br />
* When sub-categorization is not possible, <strong>the</strong> substance shall be classified as “Category 1”.<br />
B)Judgement by reliable existing revelation course<br />
When a substance has cases to be judged as corrosion (any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and<br />
1C, or Category 1) or irritation (Category 2) in human or animal results, <strong>the</strong> substance shall be<br />
classified as such. (Example: accidental cases)<br />
C) Judgement by existing test data<br />
1) Decision by in vivo test result:<br />
■ Corrosion:(any of sub-categories 1A, 1B, and 1C, or Category 1)<br />
In at least 1 of 3 tested animals after exposure <strong>for</strong> up to 4 hours:<br />
a) Necrosis into <strong>the</strong> dermis.<br />
b) Ulcer, bleeding, or bloody scabs in <strong>the</strong> applied area.<br />
c) Blanching of <strong>the</strong> skin, complete areas of alopecia, and remaining scars are found at <strong>the</strong><br />
end of <strong>the</strong> observation period of 14 days.<br />
d) In <strong>the</strong> case of ery<strong>the</strong>ma/eschar or edema score of 4 or more, <strong>the</strong> substance is determined<br />
as Corrosion (Category 1)(When, however, no irreversible lesion is found, <strong>the</strong> substance<br />
is determined as Irritation (Category 2)).<br />
■ Irritation (Category 2)<br />
At 24, 48, and 72 hours after application:<br />
a) Mean value of Draize Score (<strong>for</strong> each animal) (S) is ≥2.3 to ≤4.0 <strong>for</strong> ery<strong>the</strong>ma/eschar or<br />
edema in at least 2 of 3 tested animal,<br />
b) Inflammation and alopecia of limited area, hyperkeratosis, hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia,<br />
119