04.06.2013 Views

Detailed visual seabed survey at drilling site 7218/11-1

Detailed visual seabed survey at drilling site 7218/11-1

Detailed visual seabed survey at drilling site 7218/11-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 6. Summaryof environmentalcosts and benefits associ<strong>at</strong>edwith the three main types of discharge<br />

scenarios.<br />

Scenario Cost Benefit<br />

Dischargeon sea floor<br />

directly<strong>at</strong> SPUD<strong>site</strong><br />

Discharge<strong>at</strong> seafloor to<br />

another loc<strong>at</strong>ion with<br />

lower spongedensity.<br />

5.4.2 Deposition scenarios rel<strong>at</strong>ed to area of impact to sponges<br />

SINTEFhave previously modelled likely sp<strong>at</strong>ial extent of depositions of <strong>drilling</strong> muds/cuttings,<br />

specified in terms of depositionthicknesses. We havethen compiledthe biologicalobserv<strong>at</strong>ionsof<br />

spongeabundanceswithin eachof the modelled areasof deposition.On this basis,we present an<br />

estim<strong>at</strong>e of area of affected seafloor containing the various c<strong>at</strong>egoriesof sponge abundances<br />

(Section5.4.3, Table7). TheRENASapplic<strong>at</strong>ionfor permit to oper<strong>at</strong>epresentsdifferent altern<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

for handlingof cuttingsreferred to asCase1 – 7. Thedischargescenariospresentedbelow refer to<br />

thesecases.<br />

Note: the dischargescenarioswere workedout usingthe originalSPUDloc<strong>at</strong>ion;but on 21.09.2012,<br />

Case7 wasupd<strong>at</strong>edto a new loc<strong>at</strong>ion.Thepositionsareasfollows(both usingED50Zone34N):<br />

Longitude L<strong>at</strong>itude<br />

Explor<strong>at</strong>ionWell -original 4<strong>11</strong>870 8001215<br />

Explor<strong>at</strong>ionWell - new 4<strong>11</strong>923 8001225<br />

1 CO2 emissionsare seenin the context of beinga major contributor to oceanacidific<strong>at</strong>ionthrough uptaketo<br />

the seafrom air.<br />

Short- to middle-term local mortality to<br />

spongeswithin anareaof between20 – 70 km 2<br />

(dependingon mortality to different particle<br />

sizefractions)<br />

Additional energy consumption (CO 2<br />

emissions 1 ) from vesselsin oper<strong>at</strong>ion using<br />

dynamicpositioning(DP). Averageof 30 m 3 fuel<br />

consumption per day per vessel is not<br />

unrealistic (pers. comm. Captain of Njord<br />

Viking).<br />

Physical damage to sea floor/sponges by<br />

pipeline.<br />

Localimpactsto another areahinderingfuture<br />

(short-to-middle-term) sponge recruitment <strong>at</strong><br />

this loc<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Dischargefrom rig Additionalenergycosts(seeabove)<br />

Sediment<strong>at</strong>ionpotentially spreadover a wider<br />

area.<br />

Without d<strong>at</strong>a on lethal limits for<br />

exposure to sediment<strong>at</strong>ion, no<br />

guaranteedischargesare abovelethal<br />

limits.<br />

If not, riskof moreextensiveimpacts.<br />

Impact strictly localised.<br />

Minimalhabit<strong>at</strong> fragment<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

Long-term local recolonis<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

is likely (e.g. within the lifetime<br />

of the project– 30years+)<br />

Spongesdirectly <strong>at</strong> the SPUD<br />

<strong>site</strong>minimallyimpacted.<br />

Lower intensity of impacts<br />

immedi<strong>at</strong>ely around the SPUD<br />

loc<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />

Akvaplan-niva AS, 9296 Tromsø<br />

50 www.akvaplan.niva.no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!