Corrigendum - REACH24H Consulting Group
Corrigendum - REACH24H Consulting Group Corrigendum - REACH24H Consulting Group
2.1.3.1.3 The producer or other applicant for classification of a product shall provide adequate information concerning the names and characteristics of all explosive substances in the product and shall furnish the results of all relevant tests which have been done. It is assumed that all the explosive substances in a new article have been properly tested and then approved. 2.1.3.1.4 A report on the series of tests shall be drawn up in accordance with the requirements of the competent authority. It shall in particular contain information on: (a) The composition of the substance or the structure of the article; (b) The quantity of substance or number of articles per test; (c) The type and construction of the packaging; (d) The test assembly, including in particular the nature, quantity and arrangement of the means of initiation or ignition used; (e) The course of the test, including in particular the time elapsing until the occurrence of the first noteworthy reaction of the substance or article, the duration and characteristics of the reaction, and an estimate of the latter's completeness; (f) The effect of the reaction on the immediate surroundings (up to 25 m from the site of the test); (g) The effect of the reaction on the more remote surroundings (more than 25 m from the site of the test); and (h) The atmospheric conditions during the test. 2.1.3.1.5 Verification of the classification shall be undertaken if the substance or article or its packaging is degraded and the degradation might affect the behaviour of the item in the tests. 2.1.3.2 Procedure Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All rights reserved. 2.1.3.2.1 Figure 2.1.1 indicates the general scheme for classifying a substance or article which is to be considered for inclusion in Class 1. The assessment is in two stages. First, the potential of a substance or article to explode must be ascertained and its stability and sensitivity, both chemical and physical, must be shown to be acceptable. In order to promote uniform assessments by competent authorities, it is recommended that data from suitable tests be analyzed systematically with respect to the appropriate test criteria using the flow chart of Figure 10.2 in Part I of the Manual of Tests and Criteria. If the substance or article is acceptable for Class 1 it is then necessary to proceed to the second stage, to assign the correct hazard division by the flow chart of Figure 10.3 in the same publication. 2.1.3.2.2 The tests for acceptance and the further tests to determine the correct division in Class 1 are conveniently grouped into seven series as listed in Part I of the Manual of Tests and Criteria. The numbering of these series relates to the sequence of assessing results rather than the order in which the tests are conducted. 2.1.3.2.3 Scheme of procedure for classifying a substance or article NOTE 1: The competent authority which prescribes the definitive test method corresponding to each of the Test Types should specify the appropriate test criteria. Where there is international agreement on test criteria, the details are given in the publication referred to above describing the seven series of tests. NOTE 2: The scheme of assessment is only designed for the classification of packaged substances and articles and for individual unpacked articles. Transport in freight containers, road vehicles and rail wagons may require special tests which take into consideration the quantity (self-confinement) and kind of substance and the container for the substance. Such tests may be specified by the competent authorities. - 62 -
Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All rights reserved. NOTE 3: Since there will be borderline cases with any scheme of testing there should be an ultimate authority who will make the final decision. Such a decision may not receive international acceptance and may therefore be valid only in the country where it is made. The United Nations Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods provides a forum for the discussion of borderline cases. Where international recognition is sought for a classification, the competent authority should submit full details of all tests made including the nature of any variations introduced. Figure 2.1.1 SCHEME OF PROCEDURE FOR CLASSIFYING A SUBSTANCE OR ARTICLE REJECT E xplosive but too hazardous for transport HAZARD DIVISION ASSIGNMENT DIVISION 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 or 1.6 PRODUCT FOR CLASSIFICATION ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE ACCEPT INTO CLASS 1 CLASSIFICATION CODE - 63 - REJECT Not in C lass 1 COMPATIBILITY GROUP ASSIGNMENT COMPATIBILITY GROUP A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, L, N or S
- Page 31 and 32: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 33 and 34: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 35 and 36: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 37 and 38: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 39 and 40: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 41 and 42: CHAPTER 1.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Intr
- Page 43 and 44: 1.2.1 Definitions CHAPTER 1.2 DEFIN
- Page 45 and 46: Consignee means any person, organiz
- Page 47 and 48: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 49 and 50: Open cryogenic receptacle means a t
- Page 51 and 52: Remanufactured packagings include:
- Page 53 and 54: Clarifying examples for certain def
- Page 55 and 56: The decimal multiples and sub-multi
- Page 57 and 58: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 1.4 SECURITY PROVISIONS Int
- Page 61 and 62: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 63 and 64: 1.5.1 Scope and application Copyrig
- Page 65 and 66: 1.5.2.4 For occupational exposures
- Page 67 and 68: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 69 and 70: 2.0.0 Responsibilities CHAPTER 2.0
- Page 71 and 72: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 73 and 74: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 75 and 76: 2.0.4 Transport of samples Copyrigh
- Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER 2.1 CLASS 1 - EXPLOSIVES In
- Page 79 and 80: (e) Division 1.5 Very insensitive s
- Page 81: NOTE 1: Articles of compatibility g
- Page 85 and 86: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 87 and 88: - 67 - Type Includes: / Synonym: De
- Page 89 and 90: - 69 - Type Includes: / Synonym: De
- Page 91 and 92: 2.1.3.6 Exclusion from Class 1 Copy
- Page 93 and 94: 2.2.1 Definitions and general provi
- Page 95 and 96: 2.2.3 Mixtures of gases Copyright@U
- Page 97 and 98: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 99 and 100: 2.3.2.6 Hazard grouping based on fl
- Page 101 and 102: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 103 and 104: 2.4.2.2.3.3 For solids which may ca
- Page 105 and 106: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 107 and 108: SELF-REACTIVE SUBSTANCE Concentrati
- Page 109 and 110: Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 2.4.1: FLOW CHART SCHEME FOR
- Page 113 and 114: 2.4.3 Division 4.2 - Substances lia
- Page 115 and 116: 2.4.4.3 Assignment of packing group
- Page 117 and 118: CHAPTER 2.5 CLASS 5 - OXIDIZING SUB
- Page 119 and 120: 2.5.2.3.1.2 The classification test
- Page 121 and 122: - 101 - ORGANIC PEROXIDE Concentrat
- Page 123 and 124: - 103 - Copyright@United Nations, 2
- Page 125 and 126: - 105 - ORGANIC PEROXIDE Concentrat
- Page 127 and 128: - 107 - ORGANIC PEROXIDE Concentrat
- Page 129 and 130: - 109 - ORGANIC PEROXIDE Concentrat
- Page 131 and 132: Notes on 2.5.3.2.4: 1) Diluent type
Copyright@United Nations, 2011. All rights reserved.<br />
NOTE 3: Since there will be borderline cases with any scheme of testing there should be an ultimate<br />
authority who will make the final decision. Such a decision may not receive international acceptance and may<br />
therefore be valid only in the country where it is made. The United Nations Committee of Experts on the<br />
Transport of Dangerous Goods provides a forum for the discussion of borderline cases. Where international<br />
recognition is sought for a classification, the competent authority should submit full details of all tests made<br />
including the nature of any variations introduced.<br />
Figure 2.1.1<br />
SCHEME OF PROCEDURE FOR CLASSIFYING A SUBSTANCE OR ARTICLE<br />
REJECT<br />
E xplosive but<br />
too hazardous for transport<br />
HAZARD DIVISION<br />
ASSIGNMENT<br />
DIVISION<br />
1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4,<br />
1.5 or 1.6<br />
PRODUCT FOR CLASSIFICATION<br />
ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE<br />
ACCEPT INTO<br />
CLASS 1<br />
CLASSIFICATION CODE<br />
- 63 -<br />
REJECT<br />
Not in C lass 1<br />
COMPATIBILITY<br />
GROUP ASSIGNMENT<br />
COMPATIBILITY<br />
GROUP A, B, C, D, E, F,<br />
G, H, J, K, L, N<br />
or S