E. Coli
E. Coli E. Coli
Ciprofloxacin, Doxycyclin , Rifampicin and Streptomycin for Shahen farm meanwhile they were Ciprofloxacin, Cefotaxime, Gentamycin, Rifampicin, Streptomycin for Asher3 farm. 2/10 (20%) E.coli isolates from Atef Abd El-Aziz and Asher 2 farm were sensitive to only six drugs, they were Cefotaxime ,Ciprofloxacin, Doxycyclin, Erythromycin, Rifampicin, Strepto-mycin for Atef Abd El-Aziz farm meanwhile they were Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Doxycyclin, Rifampicin, Streptomycin and Amp-icillin for Asher2 farm. 1/10 (10%) E.coli isolate from Bela Bela farm was sensitive to seven drugs they were Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin , Gentamycin, Spectam, Colistin, Rifampicin and Doxycyclin. No isolates was sensitive to only eight or nine or ten drugs. 72
Table(12 )Sensitivity Pattern of isolates from broiler. Sensitivity of microorganisms to only one or more drugs Sensitive to all drugs Sensitive to only one drug Sensitive to only two drugs Sensitive to only three drugs Sensitive to only four drugs Sensitive to only five drugs Sensitive to only six drugs Sensitive to only seven drugs Sensitive to only eight drugs Sensitive to only nine drugs Sensitive to only ten drugs Microorganisms Salmonella Nil E.coli E.coli Salmonella E.coli E.coli E.coli Nil Nil Nil Percentag e 1/10 (10%) 0.0 1/10 (10%) 2/10 (20%) 1/10 (10%) 2/10 (20%) 2/10 (20%) 1/10 (10%) 0.0 4.13-Sensitivity percentages of each antimicrobial agent Results of sensitivity percentage of each antimicrobial agent against broiler isolates (table 13) showed that the most 73 0.0 0.0
- Page 27 and 28: Review of Literature suggested that
- Page 29 and 30: Review of Literature K5 (37.5%), 15
- Page 31 and 32: Review of Literature within Ireland
- Page 33 and 34: Review of Literature salmonella spe
- Page 35 and 36: Review of Literature Sasipreeyajan
- Page 37 and 38: Review of Literature Moreno et al.
- Page 39 and 40: Review of Literature Mohamad (1996)
- Page 41 and 42: Review of Literature pencillin (68.
- Page 43 and 44: Review of Literature El-Ghamdi et a
- Page 45 and 46: Review of Literature serious ever l
- Page 47 and 48: Review of Literature the time from
- Page 49 and 50: Review of Literature isolates from
- Page 51 and 52: 4.Results A total of 295 chicken sa
- Page 53 and 54: Table (4): Incidence of chicken Ent
- Page 55 and 56: Abolila 11 10/11(90.9%) 10/10(100%)
- Page 57 and 58: fermentation (Lactose, Maltose, Man
- Page 59 and 60: isolates were salmonella, pseudomon
- Page 61 and 62: Fig.(3)Triple sugar iron agar(TSI),
- Page 63 and 64: Fig.(4).Citrate negative E.coli iso
- Page 65 and 66: Fig.(6)An isolate was sensitive to
- Page 67 and 68: Farm Mansoura1 Omda1 Asher3 Asher4
- Page 69 and 70: Gentamycin, Colistin, Erythromycin,
- Page 71 and 72: Trimethoprim), Colistin, Erythromyc
- Page 73 and 74: (Sulpamethox-azole/ Trimethoprim),
- Page 75 and 76: Table(10)Sensitivity pattern for is
- Page 77: R = Resistant S = Sensitive CTX30 =
- Page 81 and 82: Doxycyclin, Erythromycin, were effe
- Page 83 and 84: Fig.(8) Sensitivity percentages of
- Page 85 and 86: Discussion Concerning bacteriologic
- Page 87 and 88: al., (1997) reported that 10% of E.
- Page 89 and 90: 1/2(50%) Salmonella broiler isolate
- Page 91 and 92: 12/14(85.71%) E.coli isolates from
- Page 93 and 94: streptomycin, meanwhile higher perc
- Page 95 and 96: Two out of eleven(18.18%) E.coli is
- Page 97 and 98: and Nguyen (1995) who reported mode
- Page 99 and 100: Summary Bacterial diseases have lon
- Page 101 and 102: epresented 105/138(76.08%) and 33/1
- Page 103 and 104: 100%, 100%, 63.63%, 63.63%, 63.63%,
- Page 105: 3-Results of antibiogram on biotype
- Page 108 and 109: a pediatric cohort in aperiurbab ar
- Page 110 and 111: Bozorgmehri O., Fard M.H. and Gilan
- Page 112 and 113: importance in some poultry farms. 7
- Page 114 and 115: Fisher M.E., Trampel D. W. and Grif
- Page 116 and 117: Hui, A.K. and Das, R., (2000): Prev
- Page 118 and 119: Kikuvi, G.M.; Ole-Mapenay, I.M.; Mi
- Page 120 and 121: Machado J. and Bernardo F. (1990):
- Page 122 and 123: Oxoid manual (1998): The oxoid manu
- Page 124 and 125: and O 157 Serotypes from piglets an
- Page 126 and 127: Van Donkersgoed J., Manninen K., Po
Table(12 )Sensitivity Pattern of isolates from broiler.<br />
Sensitivity of microorganisms<br />
to only one or more drugs<br />
Sensitive to all drugs<br />
Sensitive to only one drug<br />
Sensitive to only two drugs<br />
Sensitive to only three drugs<br />
Sensitive to only four drugs<br />
Sensitive to only five drugs<br />
Sensitive to only six drugs<br />
Sensitive to only seven drugs<br />
Sensitive to only eight drugs<br />
Sensitive to only nine drugs<br />
Sensitive to only ten drugs<br />
Microorganisms<br />
Salmonella<br />
Nil<br />
E.coli<br />
E.coli<br />
Salmonella<br />
E.coli<br />
E.coli<br />
E.coli<br />
Nil<br />
Nil<br />
Nil<br />
Percentag<br />
e<br />
1/10<br />
(10%)<br />
0.0<br />
1/10<br />
(10%)<br />
2/10<br />
(20%)<br />
1/10<br />
(10%)<br />
2/10<br />
(20%)<br />
2/10<br />
(20%)<br />
1/10<br />
(10%)<br />
0.0<br />
4.13-Sensitivity percentages of each antimicrobial<br />
agent<br />
Results of sensitivity percentage of each antimicrobial<br />
agent against broiler isolates (table 13) showed that the most<br />
73<br />
0.0<br />
0.0
Change language