E. Coli

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table (9) Antibiogram of layer isolates against 11 chemotherapeuticagents. Farm CTX30 CIP AMP GN SXT25 CT DO E RD ST SH Abosoltana S Abohegazy S Bian 2(A) S Asher1(A) S Asher3 S Mansoura1 S Mansoura2 S Asher1(B) S Bian 2(B) S Asher2 S Asher4 S S S S S S S S S S S S R R S R S S S S S R S S S S R R S R S R R S S S S R R S S R R S S R S R R R R R R S R R S S S S R R S R R R S S R S S S S S S S R S S S R S S R S R R S S R = Resistant S = Sensitive CTX30 = Cefotaxime CIP =Ciprofloxacin GN = Gentamycin SXT25 = Sulfaphmethaxazole/Trimethoprime SH = Spectam CT = Colistin E = Erythromicin RD = Rifampicin ST = Streptomycin AMP = Ampicillin DO = Doxycycline 4.10-Sensitivity Pattern of layer isolates. Sensitivity Patterns of Eleven isolates from layers were recorded against 11 chemotherapeutic agents including Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Ampicillin, Spectam, Gentamycin, 66 S R R S S R R R S S S S S S R R R S R R R S
(Sulpamethox-azole/ Trimethoprim), Colistin, Erythromycin, Rifmpicin, Strepto-mycin and Doxycycline), the sensitivity results of the isolates(table 10 ) to only one or more drugs revealed that:- There were no isolates sensitive to all drugs also no isolates were sensitive to only one or only two or only three drugs. 1/11(9.09%) isolate from Asher2 farm was sensitive to only four drugs, they were Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamycin, and Rifmpicin. 1/11(9.09%) isolate from Asher2 farm was sensitive to only five drugs, they were Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Doxycycline, Rifmpicin and Ampicillin. 3/11 (27.2%) E.coli isolates from Asher1(A), Asher1(B) and Bian2(B) farms were sensitive to only six drugs which were Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Colistin, Doxycycline, Erythromycin and Rifmpicin for Asher1(A) and Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Rifmpicin and Ampicillin for Asher1(B) and Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Ampicillin, Rifmpicin and (Sulpamethoxazole, Trimethoprim) for Bian2(B) isolate. 2/11(18.18%) E.coli isolate from Mansoura1 and Mansoura2 farms were sensitive to only seven drugs, they were Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Ampicillin, Strepto-mycin, Gentamycin and Doxycycline for Mansoura1 67
Page 1 and 2:
A STUDY ON THE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS I
Page 3 and 4:
List of contents Page 1-Introductio
Page 5 and 6:
Tables Page Table(1)Biochemical rea
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements First of all thank
Page 9 and 10:
2 Introduction certain serogroups,
Page 11 and 12:
Sodium chloride 5.0 g/l Agar pH 7.3
Page 13 and 14:
Sodium citrate, tribasic 2.0 g/l So
Page 15 and 16:
3.1.4.Solutions and indicators in b
Page 17 and 18:
Polyvalent 4: O6 , O27 , O78 , O148
Page 19 and 20:
serological identification accordin
Page 21 and 22: 6- Urease test The test determine t
Page 23 and 24: 3. The plate was swabbed in differe
Page 25 and 26: 2.REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1. Inciden
Page 27 and 28: Review of Literature suggested that
Page 29 and 30: Review of Literature K5 (37.5%), 15
Page 31 and 32: Review of Literature within Ireland
Page 33 and 34: Review of Literature salmonella spe
Page 35 and 36: Review of Literature Sasipreeyajan
Page 37 and 38: Review of Literature Moreno et al.
Page 39 and 40: Review of Literature Mohamad (1996)
Page 41 and 42: Review of Literature pencillin (68.
Page 43 and 44: Review of Literature El-Ghamdi et a
Page 45 and 46: Review of Literature serious ever l
Page 47 and 48: Review of Literature the time from
Page 49 and 50: Review of Literature isolates from
Page 51 and 52: 4.Results A total of 295 chicken sa
Page 53 and 54: Table (4): Incidence of chicken Ent
Page 55 and 56: Abolila 11 10/11(90.9%) 10/10(100%)
Page 57 and 58: fermentation (Lactose, Maltose, Man
Page 59 and 60: isolates were salmonella, pseudomon
Page 61 and 62: Fig.(3)Triple sugar iron agar(TSI),
Page 63 and 64: Fig.(4).Citrate negative E.coli iso
Page 65 and 66: Fig.(6)An isolate was sensitive to
Page 67 and 68: Farm Mansoura1 Omda1 Asher3 Asher4
Page 69 and 70: Gentamycin, Colistin, Erythromycin,
Page 71: Trimethoprim), Colistin, Erythromyc
Page 75 and 76: Table(10)Sensitivity pattern for is
Page 77 and 78: R = Resistant S = Sensitive CTX30 =
Page 79 and 80: Table(12 )Sensitivity Pattern of is
Page 81 and 82: Doxycyclin, Erythromycin, were effe
Page 83 and 84: Fig.(8) Sensitivity percentages of
Page 85 and 86: Discussion Concerning bacteriologic
Page 87 and 88: al., (1997) reported that 10% of E.
Page 89 and 90: 1/2(50%) Salmonella broiler isolate
Page 91 and 92: 12/14(85.71%) E.coli isolates from
Page 93 and 94: streptomycin, meanwhile higher perc
Page 95 and 96: Two out of eleven(18.18%) E.coli is
Page 97 and 98: and Nguyen (1995) who reported mode
Page 99 and 100: Summary Bacterial diseases have lon
Page 101 and 102: epresented 105/138(76.08%) and 33/1
Page 103 and 104: 100%, 100%, 63.63%, 63.63%, 63.63%,
Page 105: 3-Results of antibiogram on biotype
Page 108 and 109: a pediatric cohort in aperiurbab ar
Page 110 and 111: Bozorgmehri O., Fard M.H. and Gilan
Page 112 and 113: importance in some poultry farms. 7
Page 114 and 115: Fisher M.E., Trampel D. W. and Grif
Page 116 and 117: Hui, A.K. and Das, R., (2000): Prev
Page 118 and 119: Kikuvi, G.M.; Ole-Mapenay, I.M.; Mi
Page 120 and 121: Machado J. and Bernardo F. (1990):
Page 122 and 123:
Oxoid manual (1998): The oxoid manu
Page 124 and 125:
and O 157 Serotypes from piglets an
Page 126 and 127:
Van Donkersgoed J., Manninen K., Po
Page 128 and 129:
ﻦﻴﺘﺴﻟﻮآ , ﻦﻴﺳﺎ
Page 130:
- She received her primary educatio
show all

E. Coli

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?