E. Coli
E. Coli E. Coli
Fig.(7) An isolate was sensitive to ciprofloxacin, amikacin and gentamycin. Table (7) Antibogram of isolates from one day old chicks against ten chemotherapeutic agents. 60
Farm Mansoura1 Omda1 Asher3 Asher4 Abohegazy Absoltana1 Khalig Asher1 Omda2 CTX30 CIP Amox GN SXT25 CT DO E S S S S S S S S S Abosoltana2 S Mansoura2 Abolila S S Abohegazy2 S Khalig2 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S R R S R R R R S R R R S S R S R S R S S S S S S S S S S R R R R S S R S R R R R R R R S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S R S S S S S S R R S R R S R S S S R R S S R S R S S S S R S S R R S R S R S S RD ST R = Resistant S = Sensitive CTX30 = Cefotaxime CIP =Ciprofloxacin GN = Gentamycin SXT25 = Sulfaphmethaxazole/Trimethoprime CT = Colistin E = Erythromicin RD = Rifampicin ST = Streptomycin AMP = Ampicillin DO = Doxycycline 4.8-Sensitivity pattern of the isolates from one day old chicks. Fourteen isolates from one day old chicks were tested 10 chemo-therapeutic agents including Cefotaxime, 61 S S S R S S S S R R S S S R
- Page 15 and 16: 3.1.4.Solutions and indicators in b
- Page 17 and 18: Polyvalent 4: O6 , O27 , O78 , O148
- Page 19 and 20: serological identification accordin
- Page 21 and 22: 6- Urease test The test determine t
- Page 23 and 24: 3. The plate was swabbed in differe
- Page 25 and 26: 2.REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1. Inciden
- Page 27 and 28: Review of Literature suggested that
- Page 29 and 30: Review of Literature K5 (37.5%), 15
- Page 31 and 32: Review of Literature within Ireland
- Page 33 and 34: Review of Literature salmonella spe
- Page 35 and 36: Review of Literature Sasipreeyajan
- Page 37 and 38: Review of Literature Moreno et al.
- Page 39 and 40: Review of Literature Mohamad (1996)
- Page 41 and 42: Review of Literature pencillin (68.
- Page 43 and 44: Review of Literature El-Ghamdi et a
- Page 45 and 46: Review of Literature serious ever l
- Page 47 and 48: Review of Literature the time from
- Page 49 and 50: Review of Literature isolates from
- Page 51 and 52: 4.Results A total of 295 chicken sa
- Page 53 and 54: Table (4): Incidence of chicken Ent
- Page 55 and 56: Abolila 11 10/11(90.9%) 10/10(100%)
- Page 57 and 58: fermentation (Lactose, Maltose, Man
- Page 59 and 60: isolates were salmonella, pseudomon
- Page 61 and 62: Fig.(3)Triple sugar iron agar(TSI),
- Page 63 and 64: Fig.(4).Citrate negative E.coli iso
- Page 65: Fig.(6)An isolate was sensitive to
- Page 69 and 70: Gentamycin, Colistin, Erythromycin,
- Page 71 and 72: Trimethoprim), Colistin, Erythromyc
- Page 73 and 74: (Sulpamethox-azole/ Trimethoprim),
- Page 75 and 76: Table(10)Sensitivity pattern for is
- Page 77 and 78: R = Resistant S = Sensitive CTX30 =
- Page 79 and 80: Table(12 )Sensitivity Pattern of is
- Page 81 and 82: Doxycyclin, Erythromycin, were effe
- Page 83 and 84: Fig.(8) Sensitivity percentages of
- Page 85 and 86: Discussion Concerning bacteriologic
- Page 87 and 88: al., (1997) reported that 10% of E.
- Page 89 and 90: 1/2(50%) Salmonella broiler isolate
- Page 91 and 92: 12/14(85.71%) E.coli isolates from
- Page 93 and 94: streptomycin, meanwhile higher perc
- Page 95 and 96: Two out of eleven(18.18%) E.coli is
- Page 97 and 98: and Nguyen (1995) who reported mode
- Page 99 and 100: Summary Bacterial diseases have lon
- Page 101 and 102: epresented 105/138(76.08%) and 33/1
- Page 103 and 104: 100%, 100%, 63.63%, 63.63%, 63.63%,
- Page 105: 3-Results of antibiogram on biotype
- Page 108 and 109: a pediatric cohort in aperiurbab ar
- Page 110 and 111: Bozorgmehri O., Fard M.H. and Gilan
- Page 112 and 113: importance in some poultry farms. 7
- Page 114 and 115: Fisher M.E., Trampel D. W. and Grif
Fig.(7) An isolate was sensitive to ciprofloxacin,<br />
amikacin and gentamycin.<br />
Table (7) Antibogram of isolates from one day old chicks against ten<br />
chemotherapeutic agents.<br />
60
Change language