E. Coli
E. Coli E. Coli
Review of Literature ampicillin, sulphadimidine, trimethoprime sulphadimidine, combination of Kanamycin and gentamycin) on 201 enteropathogenic E. coli isolates. Streptomycin and tetracycline were the least effective but kanamycin and gentamycin were the most effective. The resistance pattern varied between the regions. Blanco et al. (1997) reported that ant microbial therapy is an important tool in reducing the enormous losses in portly industry caused by colibacillosis. Antimicrobial resistance testing of 468 avian E. coli strains isolated in Spain showed very high levels of resistance to trimethoprime-sulfamethoxazole (67%) and the flouroquinolones (13 to 24%). Abd-El-Mawla (1998) applied sensitivity test on 46 E. coli isolates versus to 11 different chemotherapeutic agents. It was noticed that all E.coli isolates were highly sensitive to neomycin, chloramphenicol, genataramycin and amikacin in a descending order of potently 93.6%, 91.3%, 89.1% and 82.6%, respectively. The tested isolates showed high resistance to penicillin G (100%), erythromycin (100%), trimethprime/sulphamethoxazole (80.4%) and flumequine (76.08%). A moderate sensitivity was encountered with tetracycline (73.90%), ampicillin (50%) and streptomycin (39.1%). El-Morsi (1998) found that E. coli showed a high resistance against ampicillin (100%), penicillin (97.67%) and tetracycline (69.77%). Other strains of E. coli showed high sensitivity to norfloxacin (93.02%), enrofloxacin (83.72%) and cefotaxim (72.09%). 20
Review of Literature El-Ghamdi et al. (1999) compared antibiotic resistant E. coli isolates to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, getamicin, spectinomycin, tetracycline and trimethoprime spectinomycin, tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole ranged from 57% to 99.1% Although, amoxicillincluvalanate, ceftazidime And nitro furans ranged from zero to 2.6% resistance to spectonmycin reached 96% multi-drug resistance was alarmingly high. Lambie et al. (2000) isolated E. coli from diseased broilers. The isolates showed an increasing trend of resistance to amoxicillin, paramecia, gentamycin, nitrofurance, norfloxacin and sulphamethoxazole/ trimethoprim overall, norfloxacin appeared as the best antimicrobial drug for treatment. El-Sayed et al. (2001) stated that a high level of multi-resistant strains to the antibiotic. They found that 93.3% of the strains were ampicillin resistant and 73.3% of the strains were to amoxicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazol. 2.3. Pathogenic Enterbacteria in Human 2.3.1. E. coli Chapman et al. (2002) reported that phage therapy viruses that specifically target pathogenic. Bacteria has been developed over the last 80 years, primarily in the former soviet union, where it was used 21
- Page 1 and 2: A STUDY ON THE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS I
- Page 3 and 4: List of contents Page 1-Introductio
- Page 5 and 6: Tables Page Table(1)Biochemical rea
- Page 7 and 8: Acknowledgements First of all thank
- Page 9 and 10: 2 Introduction certain serogroups,
- Page 11 and 12: Sodium chloride 5.0 g/l Agar pH 7.3
- Page 13 and 14: Sodium citrate, tribasic 2.0 g/l So
- Page 15 and 16: 3.1.4.Solutions and indicators in b
- Page 17 and 18: Polyvalent 4: O6 , O27 , O78 , O148
- Page 19 and 20: serological identification accordin
- Page 21 and 22: 6- Urease test The test determine t
- Page 23 and 24: 3. The plate was swabbed in differe
- Page 25 and 26: 2.REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1. Inciden
- Page 27 and 28: Review of Literature suggested that
- Page 29 and 30: Review of Literature K5 (37.5%), 15
- Page 31 and 32: Review of Literature within Ireland
- Page 33 and 34: Review of Literature salmonella spe
- Page 35 and 36: Review of Literature Sasipreeyajan
- Page 37 and 38: Review of Literature Moreno et al.
- Page 39 and 40: Review of Literature Mohamad (1996)
- Page 41: Review of Literature pencillin (68.
- Page 45 and 46: Review of Literature serious ever l
- Page 47 and 48: Review of Literature the time from
- Page 49 and 50: Review of Literature isolates from
- Page 51 and 52: 4.Results A total of 295 chicken sa
- Page 53 and 54: Table (4): Incidence of chicken Ent
- Page 55 and 56: Abolila 11 10/11(90.9%) 10/10(100%)
- Page 57 and 58: fermentation (Lactose, Maltose, Man
- Page 59 and 60: isolates were salmonella, pseudomon
- Page 61 and 62: Fig.(3)Triple sugar iron agar(TSI),
- Page 63 and 64: Fig.(4).Citrate negative E.coli iso
- Page 65 and 66: Fig.(6)An isolate was sensitive to
- Page 67 and 68: Farm Mansoura1 Omda1 Asher3 Asher4
- Page 69 and 70: Gentamycin, Colistin, Erythromycin,
- Page 71 and 72: Trimethoprim), Colistin, Erythromyc
- Page 73 and 74: (Sulpamethox-azole/ Trimethoprim),
- Page 75 and 76: Table(10)Sensitivity pattern for is
- Page 77 and 78: R = Resistant S = Sensitive CTX30 =
- Page 79 and 80: Table(12 )Sensitivity Pattern of is
- Page 81 and 82: Doxycyclin, Erythromycin, were effe
- Page 83 and 84: Fig.(8) Sensitivity percentages of
- Page 85 and 86: Discussion Concerning bacteriologic
- Page 87 and 88: al., (1997) reported that 10% of E.
- Page 89 and 90: 1/2(50%) Salmonella broiler isolate
- Page 91 and 92: 12/14(85.71%) E.coli isolates from
Review of Literature<br />
ampicillin, sulphadimidine, trimethoprime sulphadimidine, combination<br />
of Kanamycin and gentamycin) on 201 enteropathogenic E.<br />
coli isolates. Streptomycin and tetracycline were the least effective but<br />
kanamycin and gentamycin were the most effective. The resistance<br />
pattern varied between the regions.<br />
Blanco et al. (1997) reported that ant microbial therapy is an<br />
important tool in reducing the enormous losses in portly industry<br />
caused by colibacillosis. Antimicrobial resistance testing of 468 avian<br />
E. coli strains isolated in Spain showed very high levels of resistance<br />
to trimethoprime-sulfamethoxazole (67%) and the flouroquinolones<br />
(13 to 24%).<br />
Abd-El-Mawla (1998) applied sensitivity test on 46 E. coli<br />
isolates versus to 11 different chemotherapeutic agents. It was noticed<br />
that all E.coli isolates were highly sensitive to neomycin, chloramphenicol,<br />
genataramycin and amikacin in a descending order of<br />
potently 93.6%, 91.3%, 89.1% and 82.6%, respectively. The tested<br />
isolates showed high resistance to penicillin G (100%), erythromycin<br />
(100%), trimethprime/sulphamethoxazole (80.4%) and flumequine<br />
(76.08%). A moderate sensitivity was encountered with tetracycline<br />
(73.90%), ampicillin (50%) and streptomycin (39.1%).<br />
El-Morsi (1998) found that E. coli showed a high resistance<br />
against ampicillin (100%), penicillin (97.67%) and tetracycline<br />
(69.77%). Other strains of E. coli showed high sensitivity to norfloxacin<br />
(93.02%), enrofloxacin (83.72%) and cefotaxim (72.09%).<br />
20
Change language